How are allotment gardens managed? A comparative study of usage and development in contemporary urban space in Germany and Poland

IF 1.8 2区 社会学 Q2 GEOGRAPHY Moravian Geographical Reports Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.2478/mgr-2021-0017
M. Szczepańska, E. Kacprzak, B. Maćkiewicz, Lidia Poniży
{"title":"How are allotment gardens managed? A comparative study of usage and development in contemporary urban space in Germany and Poland","authors":"M. Szczepańska, E. Kacprzak, B. Maćkiewicz, Lidia Poniży","doi":"10.2478/mgr-2021-0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article aims to analyse the development and use of allotment gardens (AGs) and plots in Westphalia and Lippe (Germany) and Wielkopolska (Poland) to assess what functions are feasible in their current stage, thus, contributing to an ongoing discussion on the role of AGs in contemporary urban space. The analysis considered ecosystem services, green infrastructure and urban agriculture. Characteristic features of AGs were identified by means of a survey of plot-holders, in-depth interviews with representatives of allotment associations, and exploratory walks. The management and use of AGs differs in both regions in terms of accessibility, common areas, impact on the landscape and plots development. AGs in Westphalia and Lippe are accessible and developed in a way which meets needs of external users. They fit harmoniously into the surrounding landscape. However, AGs in Wielkopolska are not as accessible, prioritise internal users, and do not always blend in with their surroundings. In Westphalia and Lippe, in addition to recreational and edible plant-growing plots, there are also educational and integration ones, while in Wielkopolska main categories of plots were more numerous and varied; from recreational with a predominance of ornamental plants to fully-cultivated. However, the considerable freedom that Polish plot-holders enjoy gives rise to the gradual marginalisation of edible-plant growing.","PeriodicalId":45910,"journal":{"name":"Moravian Geographical Reports","volume":"29 1","pages":"231 - 250"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Moravian Geographical Reports","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2021-0017","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract This article aims to analyse the development and use of allotment gardens (AGs) and plots in Westphalia and Lippe (Germany) and Wielkopolska (Poland) to assess what functions are feasible in their current stage, thus, contributing to an ongoing discussion on the role of AGs in contemporary urban space. The analysis considered ecosystem services, green infrastructure and urban agriculture. Characteristic features of AGs were identified by means of a survey of plot-holders, in-depth interviews with representatives of allotment associations, and exploratory walks. The management and use of AGs differs in both regions in terms of accessibility, common areas, impact on the landscape and plots development. AGs in Westphalia and Lippe are accessible and developed in a way which meets needs of external users. They fit harmoniously into the surrounding landscape. However, AGs in Wielkopolska are not as accessible, prioritise internal users, and do not always blend in with their surroundings. In Westphalia and Lippe, in addition to recreational and edible plant-growing plots, there are also educational and integration ones, while in Wielkopolska main categories of plots were more numerous and varied; from recreational with a predominance of ornamental plants to fully-cultivated. However, the considerable freedom that Polish plot-holders enjoy gives rise to the gradual marginalisation of edible-plant growing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分配花园是如何管理的?德国和波兰当代城市空间利用与发展的比较研究
摘要本文旨在分析威斯特伐利亚、利佩(德国)和维尔科波尔斯卡(波兰)的分配花园和地块的开发和使用情况,以评估在其现阶段哪些功能是可行的,从而为正在进行的关于分配花园在当代城市空间中的作用的讨论做出贡献。分析考虑了生态系统服务、绿色基础设施和城市农业。通过对地块持有人的调查、对分配协会代表的深入访谈和探索性步行,确定了AGs的特征。AGs的管理和使用在可达性、公共区域、对景观和地块开发的影响方面有所不同。威斯特伐利亚和利普的AGs可访问,并以满足外部用户需求的方式进行开发。它们与周围的景色和谐地融为一体。然而,维尔科波尔斯卡的AGs并不那么容易访问,优先考虑内部用户,并且并不总是与周围环境融为一体。在威斯特伐利亚和利佩,除了娱乐性和可食用的植物种植区,还有教育性和综合性的种植区,而在维尔科波尔斯卡,主要的种植区种类更为丰富多样;从以观赏植物为主的休闲到完全栽培。然而,波兰土地所有者享有相当大的自由,导致可食用植物种植逐渐被边缘化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Moravian Geographical Reports je mezinárodní časopis, publikovaný v anglickém jazyce od roku 1993 Ústavem geoniky Akademie věd ČR. Publikuje příspěvky geografů a odborníků příbuzných disciplin včetně geověd a geoekologie, které mají výraznou regionální orientaci. Základní otázku, před níž stojí v současné době tito odborníci, lze položit následovně: „Jaká je úloha regionů a lokalit v globalizované společnosti, daném geografickém měřítku a jak ji můžeme hodnotit?“
期刊最新文献
Assessing and forecasting the influence of environmental controls on windstorm disturbances in the Central Low Tatras, through regression models The divided town of Český Těšín/Cieszyn as the most integrated part of the Czech-Polish borderland: A life in the cross-border educational togetherness or side by side? Consumer perception of food value: A comparative study of global supermarkets and local farmers' markets in Slovakia The Turów coal mine international dispute as a determinant of the cross-border integration of inhabitants of the Polish-Czech border Geography of migration motives: Matching migration motives with socioeconomic data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1