Safeguarding Curricular Self-Experiences in Undergraduate Music Therapy Education and Training

IF 0.9 Q4 REHABILITATION Music Therapy Perspectives Pub Date : 2020-12-31 DOI:10.1093/mtp/miaa027
James Hiller, Courtney Belt, Susan C. Gardstrom, Joy Willenbrink-Conte
{"title":"Safeguarding Curricular Self-Experiences in Undergraduate Music Therapy Education and Training","authors":"James Hiller, Courtney Belt, Susan C. Gardstrom, Joy Willenbrink-Conte","doi":"10.1093/mtp/miaa027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The purpose of this paper is to put forth a model to support the psychological safety of undergraduate students as they engage in a form of experiential learning called self-experiences (SEs). SEs pair active engagement in learning episodes with learner self-inquiry. The need to safeguard curricular SEs is grounded in the American Music Therapy Association’s Professional Competencies and Code of Ethics and the Certification Board for Music Therapists’ Board Certification Domains. We first explicate several types and benefits of SEs and identify potential risks and contraindications that may compromise learners’ psychological safety and even cause harm. Next, we describe the steps we took in developing the model and gaining administrative approval. We outline major tenets and describe specific safeguarding practices at various levels of implementation. We offer a hypothetical vignette to contextualize the information, address certain challenges in implementing this model, and offer recommendations for future research related to undergraduate experiential learning. Educators, clinical trainers, and supervisors who employ SEs are encouraged to implement safeguards toward upholding professional ethics and supporting learners’ personal and professional development.","PeriodicalId":44813,"journal":{"name":"Music Therapy Perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Music Therapy Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/mtp/miaa027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to put forth a model to support the psychological safety of undergraduate students as they engage in a form of experiential learning called self-experiences (SEs). SEs pair active engagement in learning episodes with learner self-inquiry. The need to safeguard curricular SEs is grounded in the American Music Therapy Association’s Professional Competencies and Code of Ethics and the Certification Board for Music Therapists’ Board Certification Domains. We first explicate several types and benefits of SEs and identify potential risks and contraindications that may compromise learners’ psychological safety and even cause harm. Next, we describe the steps we took in developing the model and gaining administrative approval. We outline major tenets and describe specific safeguarding practices at various levels of implementation. We offer a hypothetical vignette to contextualize the information, address certain challenges in implementing this model, and offer recommendations for future research related to undergraduate experiential learning. Educators, clinical trainers, and supervisors who employ SEs are encouraged to implement safeguards toward upholding professional ethics and supporting learners’ personal and professional development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
维护本科音乐治疗教育与培训中的课程自我体验
本文的目的是提出一个模型来支持本科生在进行一种称为自我体验(SE)的体验式学习时的心理安全。SE将积极参与学习事件与学习者的自我探究联系起来。保护课程SE的必要性是基于美国音乐治疗协会的专业能力和道德准则以及音乐治疗师委员会认证领域认证委员会。我们首先阐述了SE的几种类型和益处,并确定了可能危及学习者心理安全甚至造成伤害的潜在风险和禁忌症。接下来,我们将描述我们在开发模型和获得行政批准方面所采取的步骤。我们概述了主要原则,并描述了各个实施层面的具体保障做法。我们提供了一个假设的小插曲,将信息置于背景中,解决实施该模型的某些挑战,并为未来与本科生体验式学习相关的研究提供建议。鼓励雇用SE的教育工作者、临床培训师和主管实施保障措施,维护职业道德,支持学习者的个人和职业发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Music Therapy Perspectives
Music Therapy Perspectives REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Supporting Music Therapy Majors with Mental Health Conditions Ethical Considerations in Co-Authoring Research with Music Therapy Stakeholders Making Mistakes Together: Therapy Participant, Parent, and Therapist Perspectives on Music Therapy in Two Different Settings Exploring Different Types of Music Cues for Arm Movements in Adults with Parkinson’s Correction to: Language Discordance in Music Therapy: A Phenomenological Study of Delivering Music Therapy Services with Interpreters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1