Trust in Institutions, Social Solidarity, and the Perception of Social Cohesion in the Republic of Moldova in the Early Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic

IF 0.5 Q3 AREA STUDIES Comparative Southeast European Studies Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.1515/soeu-2021-0034
Petru Negură, L. Gașper, Mihai Potoroacă
{"title":"Trust in Institutions, Social Solidarity, and the Perception of Social Cohesion in the Republic of Moldova in the Early Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"Petru Negură, L. Gașper, Mihai Potoroacă","doi":"10.1515/soeu-2021-0034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Research shows that social cohesion is crucial to the promotion of public health and the response to pandemic disease. This paper discusses a few key aspects of social cohesion in Moldova in the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, namely trust in the government, social solidarity, and the perception of social cohesion. The article uses data from two sources: first from in-depth interviews carried out in May 2020 with 95 people of high status, and then from a nationally representative survey conducted in July 2020. We also compared the case of Moldova with those of other European countries regarding trust in institutions and success in combating the pandemic. The paper suggests that awareness of the COVID-19 pandemic was correlated with socioeconomic status, education, and by respondents’ trust in institutions. The interviewees participating in the qualitative research defined social cohesion as the observance of health rules and suggested that solidarity and social support were uneven during the crisis.","PeriodicalId":29828,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Southeast European Studies","volume":"69 1","pages":"453 - 481"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Southeast European Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/soeu-2021-0034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract Research shows that social cohesion is crucial to the promotion of public health and the response to pandemic disease. This paper discusses a few key aspects of social cohesion in Moldova in the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, namely trust in the government, social solidarity, and the perception of social cohesion. The article uses data from two sources: first from in-depth interviews carried out in May 2020 with 95 people of high status, and then from a nationally representative survey conducted in July 2020. We also compared the case of Moldova with those of other European countries regarding trust in institutions and success in combating the pandemic. The paper suggests that awareness of the COVID-19 pandemic was correlated with socioeconomic status, education, and by respondents’ trust in institutions. The interviewees participating in the qualitative research defined social cohesion as the observance of health rules and suggested that solidarity and social support were uneven during the crisis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎疫情早期摩尔多瓦共和国对机构的信任、社会团结和社会凝聚力的认识
摘要研究表明,社会凝聚力对促进公共卫生和应对流行病至关重要。本文讨论了新冠肺炎疫情早期摩尔多瓦社会凝聚力的几个关键方面,即对政府的信任、社会团结和对社会凝聚力的认识。这篇文章使用了来自两个来源的数据:第一个来源于2020年5月对95名高地位人士进行的深入采访,然后来自2020年7月进行的一项具有全国代表性的调查。我们还将摩尔多瓦与其他欧洲国家在信任机构和成功抗击疫情方面的情况进行了比较。论文表明,对新冠肺炎大流行的认识与社会经济地位、教育以及受访者对机构的信任有关。参与定性研究的受访者将社会凝聚力定义为遵守健康规则,并表示在危机期间,团结和社会支持是不均衡的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
33.30%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
The Politics of Covid-19 Vaccination Hesitancy in Southeastern Europe. The Slovenian Perception of the EU: From Outstanding Pupil to Solid Member Frontmatter The Age of Skin and the Epoch of an Author: A Eulogy to Dubravka Ugrešić Romania: A Case of Differentiated Integration into the European Union
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1