Datafication, Power and Control in Development: A Historical Perspective on the Perils and Longevity of Data

IF 1.7 4区 社会学 Q3 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Progress in Development Studies Pub Date : 2022-02-25 DOI:10.1177/14649934221076580
K. Cieslik, Dániel Margócsy
{"title":"Datafication, Power and Control in Development: A Historical Perspective on the Perils and Longevity of Data","authors":"K. Cieslik, Dániel Margócsy","doi":"10.1177/14649934221076580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The collection, processing, storage and circulation of data are fundamental element of contemporary societies. While the positivistic literature on ‘data revolution’ finds it essential for improving development delivery, critical data studies stress the threats of datafication. In this article, we demonstrate that datafication has been happening continuously through history, driven by political and economic pressures. We use historical examples to show how resource and personal data were extracted, accumulated and commodified by colonial empires, national governments and trade organizations, and argue that similar extractive processes are a present-day threat in the Global South. We argue that the decoupling of earlier and current datafication processes obscures the underlying, complex power dynamics of datafication. Our historical perspective shows how, once aggregated, data may become imperishable and can be appropriated for problematic purposes in the long run by both public and private entities. Using historical case studies, we challenge the current regulatory approaches that view data as a commodity and frame it instead as a mobile, non-perishable, yet ideally inalienable right of people.","PeriodicalId":47042,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Development Studies","volume":"22 1","pages":"352 - 373"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Development Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14649934221076580","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The collection, processing, storage and circulation of data are fundamental element of contemporary societies. While the positivistic literature on ‘data revolution’ finds it essential for improving development delivery, critical data studies stress the threats of datafication. In this article, we demonstrate that datafication has been happening continuously through history, driven by political and economic pressures. We use historical examples to show how resource and personal data were extracted, accumulated and commodified by colonial empires, national governments and trade organizations, and argue that similar extractive processes are a present-day threat in the Global South. We argue that the decoupling of earlier and current datafication processes obscures the underlying, complex power dynamics of datafication. Our historical perspective shows how, once aggregated, data may become imperishable and can be appropriated for problematic purposes in the long run by both public and private entities. Using historical case studies, we challenge the current regulatory approaches that view data as a commodity and frame it instead as a mobile, non-perishable, yet ideally inalienable right of people.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
发展中的数据化、权力和控制:从历史角度看数据的危险和寿命
数据的收集、处理、存储和流通是当代社会的基本要素。虽然关于“数据革命”的实证文献发现它对改进开发交付至关重要,但关键数据研究强调了数据化的威胁。在这篇文章中,我们证明了在政治和经济压力的驱动下,数据化在历史上一直在持续发生。我们用历史例子来展示殖民帝国、国家政府和贸易组织是如何提取、积累和商品化资源和个人数据的,并认为类似的提取过程是当今全球南方的威胁。我们认为,早期和当前数据化过程的脱钩掩盖了数据化的潜在、复杂的权力动态。我们的历史观点表明,一旦汇总,数据可能会变得不可破坏,从长远来看,公共和私人实体都可能将其用于有问题的目的。通过历史案例研究,我们挑战了当前的监管方法,即将数据视为一种商品,并将其视为一项移动的、不易腐烂的、但理想情况下不可剥夺的人民权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Progress in Development Studies
Progress in Development Studies DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Progress in Development Studies is an exciting new forum for the discussion of development issues, ranging from: · Poverty alleviation and international aid · The international debt crisis · Economic development and industrialization · Environmental degradation and sustainable development · Political governance and civil society · Gender relations · The rights of the child
期刊最新文献
Cuban Youth: Changing Attitudes Towards Sexual and Reproductive Health How Is Mainstreaming Disaster Risk Reduction Progressing in Terms of Development Cooperation? A Portfolio Analysis of DRR Aid The Bitter and the Sweet: Managerial Perceptions of the Well-Being of Ethiopian Female Apparel and Horticultural Workers What Do Practitioners Want from Research? Exploring Ugandan and American Development Practitioners’ Interest in Research Gender and the Multilateral Development Banks: From WID to GAD to Retroliberal WID
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1