Obsolescing Bargain and Economic Equilibrium in International Energy Investment Contracts

Q2 Social Sciences European Business Law Review Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.54648/eulr2022038
Hamid Reza Younesi
{"title":"Obsolescing Bargain and Economic Equilibrium in International Energy Investment Contracts","authors":"Hamid Reza Younesi","doi":"10.54648/eulr2022038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the concepts of obsolescing bargain and economic equilibrium in international energy investment contracts. Equilibrium means the balance of interests that the parties’ contract embodies. Part of the idea of equilibrium is to entrench a way to keep their interests in harmony. Equilibrium is the point that host governments and foreign investors reach at the time when they strike the bargain. The equilibrium is stable if it is resilient to events which challenge it and have the potential of disrupting the balance. The point to the obsolescing bargain model is that the equilibrium is inherently unstable and therefore, there is a need for a proper framework surrounding the investment contract in order to reinforce the stability of the equilibrium. This is the key point the obsolescing bargain model makes in relation to the instability of the contractual equilibrium. If we look at it such relationship as a one-off set of rights and duties, then it is unstable. But, instead if we look at the equilibrium as a relationship that is dynamic and evolves, then it can be stable. This article underscores the significance of maintaining equilibrium in the relation of foreign investor and host state to avoid obsolescing bargain and international investment disputes.\nEconomic equilibrium, foreign investor, host state, international energy investment contracts, obsolescing bargain, risk of expropriation, international investment disputes, contractual flexibility, allocation of risk, contractual stability","PeriodicalId":53431,"journal":{"name":"European Business Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Business Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/eulr2022038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the concepts of obsolescing bargain and economic equilibrium in international energy investment contracts. Equilibrium means the balance of interests that the parties’ contract embodies. Part of the idea of equilibrium is to entrench a way to keep their interests in harmony. Equilibrium is the point that host governments and foreign investors reach at the time when they strike the bargain. The equilibrium is stable if it is resilient to events which challenge it and have the potential of disrupting the balance. The point to the obsolescing bargain model is that the equilibrium is inherently unstable and therefore, there is a need for a proper framework surrounding the investment contract in order to reinforce the stability of the equilibrium. This is the key point the obsolescing bargain model makes in relation to the instability of the contractual equilibrium. If we look at it such relationship as a one-off set of rights and duties, then it is unstable. But, instead if we look at the equilibrium as a relationship that is dynamic and evolves, then it can be stable. This article underscores the significance of maintaining equilibrium in the relation of foreign investor and host state to avoid obsolescing bargain and international investment disputes. Economic equilibrium, foreign investor, host state, international energy investment contracts, obsolescing bargain, risk of expropriation, international investment disputes, contractual flexibility, allocation of risk, contractual stability
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国际能源投资合同中的过时交易与经济均衡
本文研究了国际能源投资合同中的过时交易和经济均衡的概念。均衡是指当事人契约所体现的利益平衡。平衡概念的一部分是确立一种保持双方利益和谐的方法。均衡是东道国政府和外国投资者达成协议时所能达到的程度。如果平衡对挑战它并有可能破坏平衡的事件具有弹性,那么它就是稳定的。过时的讨价还价模型的要点是,均衡本质上是不稳定的,因此,需要围绕投资合同建立一个适当的框架,以加强均衡的稳定性。这是关于契约均衡不稳定性的过时交易模型的关键点。如果我们把这种关系看作是一套一次性的权利和义务,那么它是不稳定的。但是,相反,如果我们把平衡看作是一种动态的、不断发展的关系,那么它就可以是稳定的。本文强调了保持外商与东道国关系的均衡,以避免过时的交易和国际投资争端的重要性。经济均衡,外国投资者,东道国,国际能源投资合同,过时交易,征收风险,国际投资纠纷,合同灵活性,风险分配,合同稳定性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Business Law Review
European Business Law Review Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: The mission of the European Business Law Review is to provide a forum for analysis and discussion of business law, including European Union law and the laws of the Member States and other European countries, as well as legal frameworks and issues in international and comparative contexts. The Review moves freely over the boundaries that divide the law, and covers business law, broadly defined, in public or private law, domestic, European or international law. Our topics of interest include commercial, financial, corporate, private and regulatory laws with a broadly business dimension. The Review offers current, authoritative scholarship on a wide range of issues and developments, featuring contributors providing an international as well as a European perspective. The Review is an invaluable source of current scholarship, information, practical analysis, and expert guidance for all practising lawyers, advisers, and scholars dealing with European business law on a regular basis. The Review has over 25 years established the highest scholarly standards. It distinguishes itself as open-minded, embracing interests that appeal to the scholarly, practitioner and policy-making spheres. It practices strict routines of peer review. The Review imposes no word limit on submissions, subject to the appropriateness of the word length to the subject under discussion.
期刊最新文献
Article: Legislation Comment: Considerations on the Digital Markets Act, the Way to a Fair and Open Digital Environment Article: Open-Price Contracts Under the CISG: The Law in Action Article: EU Law and the Member States’ Competence to Regulate the Operation of Collaborative Economy Platforms – Where Do We Stand after the Digital Services Act Article: The Systemic Importance of Asset Managers: A Case Study for the Future of SIFI Regulation Article: Codes of Conduct in German Employment Relationships – A Measure to Adequately Implementing Compliance and Data Protection?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1