Unmaking Apprenticeship in Early Modern London: Goldsmiths’ Apprentices and the Lord Mayor’s Court, 1597–1720

IF 0.2 3区 历史学 Q4 AREA STUDIES London Journal Pub Date : 2023-02-02 DOI:10.1080/03058034.2022.2152976
W. Chaffin, P. Wallis
{"title":"Unmaking Apprenticeship in Early Modern London: Goldsmiths’ Apprentices and the Lord Mayor’s Court, 1597–1720","authors":"W. Chaffin, P. Wallis","doi":"10.1080/03058034.2022.2152976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Apprenticeship in London was the concern of both livery company and city institutions. In this article, we connect evidence about the petitions submitted by apprentices to the Lord Mayor’s Court for early discharge from their indentures with the entries recording their apprenticeship and freedom surviving in the records of Goldsmiths’ Company. Each contains a distinct set of complementary information about apprenticeship in London. By positioning appeals to the Lord Mayor’s Court against the company’s records of youths’ trajectories through apprenticeship, we can expand our understanding of the contractual framework of training and associated enforcement mechanisms in early modern London. As we show, the Court was used to negotiate with masters, as well as to terminate contracts. Quitting an apprenticeship through the court did mildly ‘scar’ the chances of youths (not masters), but the Court process appears to have largely protected reputations. Finally, we provide the first estimate of gaps in livery company registration of apprentices, particularly female apprentices.","PeriodicalId":43904,"journal":{"name":"London Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"London Journal","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03058034.2022.2152976","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Apprenticeship in London was the concern of both livery company and city institutions. In this article, we connect evidence about the petitions submitted by apprentices to the Lord Mayor’s Court for early discharge from their indentures with the entries recording their apprenticeship and freedom surviving in the records of Goldsmiths’ Company. Each contains a distinct set of complementary information about apprenticeship in London. By positioning appeals to the Lord Mayor’s Court against the company’s records of youths’ trajectories through apprenticeship, we can expand our understanding of the contractual framework of training and associated enforcement mechanisms in early modern London. As we show, the Court was used to negotiate with masters, as well as to terminate contracts. Quitting an apprenticeship through the court did mildly ‘scar’ the chances of youths (not masters), but the Court process appears to have largely protected reputations. Finally, we provide the first estimate of gaps in livery company registration of apprentices, particularly female apprentices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
近代早期伦敦的学徒制:金匠学徒和市长法庭,1597-1720
伦敦的学徒制是制服公司和城市机构都关心的问题。在这篇文章中,我们将学徒向市长法院提交的要求提前解除合同的请愿书的证据与金匠公司记录中记录他们学徒生涯和自由的条目联系起来。每个都包含一组关于伦敦学徒制的独特补充信息。通过向市长法院提起上诉,反对该公司对年轻人学徒生涯的记录,我们可以扩大对现代早期伦敦培训合同框架和相关执行机制的理解。正如我们所展示的,法院被用来与船长谈判,以及终止合同。通过法庭放弃学徒制确实给年轻人(而不是大师)的机会带来了轻微的“创伤”,但法庭程序似乎在很大程度上保护了声誉。最后,我们提供了学徒,特别是女性学徒在制服公司注册方面的差距的初步估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
London Journal
London Journal Multiple-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The scope of The London Journal is broad, embracing all aspects of metropolitan society past and present, including comparative studies. The Journal is multi-disciplinary and is intended to interest all concerned with the understanding and enrichment of London and Londoners: historians, geographers, economists, sociologists, social workers, political scientists, planners, educationalist, archaeologists, conservationists, architects, and all those taking an interest in the fine and performing arts, the natural environment and in commentaries on metropolitan life in fiction as in fact
期刊最新文献
Designs on Democracy: Architecture and the Public in Interwar London Designs on Democracy: Architecture and the Public in Interwar London . By N eal S hasore . Pp. xxvii + 432 + 142 illustrations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022. £71.00. ISBN 978-0-19-284972-4. Hardback. Vagabonds: Life on the Streets of Nineteenth-Century London Vagabonds: Life on the Streets of Nineteenth-Century London . By O skar J ensen . Pp. 352. London: Duckworth Books, 2022. £20.00. ISBN 978071564392. Hardback. A Network of Contacts: Metropolitan Influences in the Delivery of Poor Relief in the London Hinterland (1778–1785) London Marine Insurance, 1438–1824: Risk, Trade, and the Early Modern State Nicholas Barbon: Developing London, 1667–1698
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1