Comparing sporting nations: theory and method

IF 2.1 Q2 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics Pub Date : 2022-07-03 DOI:10.1080/19406940.2022.2037686
Grzegorz Botwina
{"title":"Comparing sporting nations: theory and method","authors":"Grzegorz Botwina","doi":"10.1080/19406940.2022.2037686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Comparison is one of the basic skills of people, which allow them to make sense of the surrounding world. However, as the society grows, creating more complex structures, it becomes much more demanding to make the comparisons in a meaningful and insightful way. The authors of Comparing Sporting Nations: Theory and Method decomposed the philosophical underpinnings of various methods of comparing nations through the lens of sport and gave a comprehensive image of what is there to be used, how to use it and what results can or cannot be obtained with particular tools in hand. The book was co-authored by Mathew Dowling, a senior lecturer at the Cambridge Centre for Sport and Exercise Sciences at Anglia Ruskin University, UK, and Spencer Harris, an associate professor of Sport Management at the University of Colorado, US. Dowling’s research focuses on the organisational theory in sport sector, governance and sport policy. The previous studies by Harris are related to sport governance and policy. Both authors have previously addressed the issue of comparative studies within sport. It is a textbook that brings together the theory and methods of comparative analysis in sport. The authors use case studies to illustrate pros and cons of this methods or as they call it comparative analysis. The authors explain the rationale behind and issues with comparative studies and further with comparative studies in sport. They describe in an easy and comprehensive way, what do we gain but what we can loose while making comparisons in sport. As the authors put it:","PeriodicalId":47174,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics","volume":"14 1","pages":"581 - 583"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2022.2037686","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Comparison is one of the basic skills of people, which allow them to make sense of the surrounding world. However, as the society grows, creating more complex structures, it becomes much more demanding to make the comparisons in a meaningful and insightful way. The authors of Comparing Sporting Nations: Theory and Method decomposed the philosophical underpinnings of various methods of comparing nations through the lens of sport and gave a comprehensive image of what is there to be used, how to use it and what results can or cannot be obtained with particular tools in hand. The book was co-authored by Mathew Dowling, a senior lecturer at the Cambridge Centre for Sport and Exercise Sciences at Anglia Ruskin University, UK, and Spencer Harris, an associate professor of Sport Management at the University of Colorado, US. Dowling’s research focuses on the organisational theory in sport sector, governance and sport policy. The previous studies by Harris are related to sport governance and policy. Both authors have previously addressed the issue of comparative studies within sport. It is a textbook that brings together the theory and methods of comparative analysis in sport. The authors use case studies to illustrate pros and cons of this methods or as they call it comparative analysis. The authors explain the rationale behind and issues with comparative studies and further with comparative studies in sport. They describe in an easy and comprehensive way, what do we gain but what we can loose while making comparisons in sport. As the authors put it:
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体育民族比较:理论与方法
比较是人们的基本技能之一,这使他们能够理解周围的世界。然而,随着社会的发展,创造了更复杂的结构,以一种有意义和有洞察力的方式进行比较变得更加困难。《比较体育国家:理论与方法》一书的作者通过体育的视角分解了各种比较国家方法的哲学基础,并全面介绍了可以使用什么、如何使用它以及使用手中的特定工具可以或不能获得什么结果。这本书由英国圣公会罗斯金大学剑桥体育与锻炼科学中心高级讲师马修·道林和美国科罗拉多大学体育管理副教授斯潘塞·哈里斯合著。道林的研究重点是体育部门、治理和体育政策的组织理论。哈里斯之前的研究与体育治理和政策有关。两位作者之前都讨论过体育领域的比较研究问题。这是一本汇集了体育比较分析理论和方法的教科书。作者使用案例研究来说明这种方法的利弊,或者他们称之为比较分析。作者解释了比较研究背后的理论基础和问题,并进一步解释了体育比较研究。他们以一种简单而全面的方式描述了在体育运动中进行比较时,我们得到了什么,但可以失去什么。正如作者所言:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics
International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
Unlocking the power of sports: an exploration of the nexus between shared place, community competence, and sense of community Constraints and facilitators of elite athletes’ dual careers: a systematic literature review The arsenal of democracy? An examination of political regime types’ success in the global sporting arms race following the collapse of the iron curtain ‘Fog on the tyne’? The ‘common-sense’ focus on ‘sportswashing’ and the 2021 takeover of Newcastle United Power in mixed martial arts (MMA): a case study of the ultimate fighting championship (UFC)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1