Voting on Abortion Again and Again and Again: Campaign Efforts and Effects

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY EIRE-IRELAND Pub Date : 2022-01-06 DOI:10.1353/eir.2021.0014
T. Reidy
{"title":"Voting on Abortion Again and Again and Again: Campaign Efforts and Effects","authors":"T. Reidy","doi":"10.1353/eir.2021.0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On 25 May 2018 the Eighth Amendment of Bunreacht na hÉireann, the Irish Constitution, was repealed in a referendum vote, and abortion provision in Ireland was significantly liberalized as a result. Repeal had been expected. The Yes side led opinion polls during the campaign, and polls over many years indicated that attitudes to abortion had been transformed from the conservative views that dominated in the 1980s. But the size of the Yes victory and the large turnout among voters were a surprise to many. Abortion policy has assailed Irish politics for nearly four decades, and the 2018 referendum was the sixth time a question had been put to the people on aspects of abortion policy since the first referendum in 1983. By 2018 the central issues had been extensively debated over a long period, but with notable evidence of a change in tone and complexity. Early debates leading to the 1983 vote were marked by absolutist arguments and traditional belief systems on the part of the dominant anti-abortion side, and the first referendum campaign has been singled out for its “rancor and divisiveness.” However, by the time of the fifth abortion referendum in 2002, Fiachra Kennedy could characterize the debate as comprised of a “series of moral conundrums.” A succession of “hard cases,” legal judgments, and sustained campaigns inside and outside of parliament led the","PeriodicalId":43507,"journal":{"name":"EIRE-IRELAND","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EIRE-IRELAND","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/eir.2021.0014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

On 25 May 2018 the Eighth Amendment of Bunreacht na hÉireann, the Irish Constitution, was repealed in a referendum vote, and abortion provision in Ireland was significantly liberalized as a result. Repeal had been expected. The Yes side led opinion polls during the campaign, and polls over many years indicated that attitudes to abortion had been transformed from the conservative views that dominated in the 1980s. But the size of the Yes victory and the large turnout among voters were a surprise to many. Abortion policy has assailed Irish politics for nearly four decades, and the 2018 referendum was the sixth time a question had been put to the people on aspects of abortion policy since the first referendum in 1983. By 2018 the central issues had been extensively debated over a long period, but with notable evidence of a change in tone and complexity. Early debates leading to the 1983 vote were marked by absolutist arguments and traditional belief systems on the part of the dominant anti-abortion side, and the first referendum campaign has been singled out for its “rancor and divisiveness.” However, by the time of the fifth abortion referendum in 2002, Fiachra Kennedy could characterize the debate as comprised of a “series of moral conundrums.” A succession of “hard cases,” legal judgments, and sustained campaigns inside and outside of parliament led the
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一次又一次关于堕胎的投票:竞选努力和效果
2018年5月25日,《爱尔兰宪法》第八修正案在公民投票中被废除,爱尔兰的堕胎规定因此大幅自由化。废除是意料之中的事。在竞选期间,“赞成”一方在民意调查中领先,多年来的民意调查表明,人们对堕胎的态度已经从20世纪80年代占主导地位的保守观点转变过来。但“赞成”的胜利规模和选民的大量投票率让许多人感到惊讶。近四十年来,堕胎政策一直困扰着爱尔兰政治,2018年的公投是自1983年第一次公投以来,第六次就堕胎政策的各个方面向人民提出问题。到2018年,这些核心问题已经进行了长时间的广泛辩论,但有明显证据表明语气和复杂性发生了变化。1983年投票前的早期辩论以绝对主义论点和传统信仰体系为标志,占主导地位的反堕胎一方,第一次公投运动因其“仇恨和分裂”而被点名。然而,到2002年第五次堕胎公投时,Fiachra Kennedy可以将这场辩论描述为“一系列道德难题”。一系列“棘手案件”、法律判决和议会内外持续的运动导致了
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
EIRE-IRELAND
EIRE-IRELAND HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: An interdisciplinary scholarly journal of international repute, Éire Ireland is the leading forum in the flourishing field of Irish Studies. Since 1966, Éire-Ireland has published a wide range of imaginative work and scholarly articles from all areas of the arts, humanities, and social sciences relating to Ireland and Irish America.
期刊最新文献
"One Little Slice, from a Child's Point of View": Locating Childhood Experience during the Civil War in County Kerry in Archived Oral History A New Ranch War?: Cattle Driving and Civil War Agrarian Disorder, 1922–23 Editors' Introduction: The Civil War of 1922–23 Neutral Northerners during the Irish Civil War: A Biographical Study Civil Administration and Economic Endowments in the Munster Republic's "Real Capital," July–August 1922
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1