What Models Tell us about Long-term Contracts in Times of the Energy Transition

IF 1.8 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.5547/2160-5890.8.1.IABA
I. Abada, Gauthier de Maere d'Aertrycke, A. Ehrenmann, Y. Smeers
{"title":"What Models Tell us about Long-term Contracts in Times of the Energy Transition","authors":"I. Abada, Gauthier de Maere d'Aertrycke, A. Ehrenmann, Y. Smeers","doi":"10.5547/2160-5890.8.1.IABA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The efficiency of short-term markets is a recurrent and major concern in EU documents on the restructuring of the gas and electricity sectors. The Winter Package of the European Commission reinforces that message: efficient short-term energy markets and associated short-term energy price signals are implicitly presented as sufficient conditions for steering investment in the energy transition. This is a folk, theorem for which one finds no proof whether in theory or observation. The reason is that there is a long and risky path between creating value in short-term markets and appraising this value in investment calculations. Without a proper environment for trading risk the future benefits from the efficient short-run market will not be properly conveyed to the investor. Risk is today overwhelming both in the global economy in general and in the gas and power sectors in particular and it is commonly acknowledged that it has a devastating effect on investment. Short run efficiency is certainly of the essence for the success of the restructuring and the transition of the energy sector but it will not suffice if unmanageable risks cloud the path from the short term to the long term.","PeriodicalId":45808,"journal":{"name":"Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5547/2160-5890.8.1.IABA","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

The efficiency of short-term markets is a recurrent and major concern in EU documents on the restructuring of the gas and electricity sectors. The Winter Package of the European Commission reinforces that message: efficient short-term energy markets and associated short-term energy price signals are implicitly presented as sufficient conditions for steering investment in the energy transition. This is a folk, theorem for which one finds no proof whether in theory or observation. The reason is that there is a long and risky path between creating value in short-term markets and appraising this value in investment calculations. Without a proper environment for trading risk the future benefits from the efficient short-run market will not be properly conveyed to the investor. Risk is today overwhelming both in the global economy in general and in the gas and power sectors in particular and it is commonly acknowledged that it has a devastating effect on investment. Short run efficiency is certainly of the essence for the success of the restructuring and the transition of the energy sector but it will not suffice if unmanageable risks cloud the path from the short term to the long term.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在能源转型时期,模型告诉我们什么是长期合同
短期市场的效率是欧盟关于天然气和电力部门重组的文件中经常出现的主要问题。欧盟委员会的冬季一揽子计划强化了这一信息:有效的短期能源市场和相关的短期能源价格信号被暗示为引导能源转型投资的充分条件。这是一个民间的定理,无论是在理论上还是在观察中都找不到证明。原因在于,在短期市场创造价值和在投资计算中评估这一价值之间存在一条漫长而有风险的道路。如果没有适当的风险交易环境,有效的短期市场的未来收益将无法恰当地传递给投资者。如今,无论是在全球经济总体上,还是在天然气和电力行业,风险都势不可挡。人们普遍认为,风险对投资具有破坏性影响。短期效率当然是能源部门重组和转型成功的关键,但如果无法控制的风险笼罩了从短期到长期的道路,那么短期效率是不够的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Energy Network Innovation for Green Transition: Economic Issues and Regulatory Options Model-Based Evaluation of Decentralised Electricity Markets at Different Phases of the German Energy Transition Socio-technical Inertia: Understanding the Barriers to Distributed Generation in Pakistan Residential Welfare-Loss from Electricity Supply Interruptions in South Africa: Cost-Benefit Analysis of Distributed Energy Resource Subsidy Programs Cost Efficiency Evaluation of Thermal Power Plants in Bangladesh Using a Two-Stage DEA Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1