A gardening and woodwork group in mental health: a step towards recovery

Q3 Health Professions Irish Journal of Occupational Therapy Pub Date : 2021-11-12 DOI:10.1108/ijot-08-2021-0018
Róisín Sinnott, Maria Rowlís
{"title":"A gardening and woodwork group in mental health: a step towards recovery","authors":"Róisín Sinnott, Maria Rowlís","doi":"10.1108/ijot-08-2021-0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to evaluate the impact of an eight-week gardening and woodwork group programme on individuals’ recovery goals in an adult community mental health setting.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nSeven individuals participated in the research. The programme was designed and facilitated by two occupational therapists (the authors) and one horticulture and trade skills facilitator. The goal attainment scale was used as a quantitative outcome measure as it allowed individuals to collaboratively set occupation-focused recovery-oriented goals. Due to the small sample size, descriptive statistics were used to analyse this data. Qualitative feedback was gathered through participant feedback forms when the programme ended.\n\n\nFindings\nQuantitative findings indicate positive results for individuals’ progression towards their recovery goals, with six out of seven participants either achieving or exceeding their goals. One person who attended only one out of eight groups had “worse than expected” goal achievement.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nWhile there is evidence for the use of gardening and woodwork group therapy in mental health settings, most studies have relied on symptom-focused questionnaires or qualitative results rather than quantifiable recovery-oriented measures (Cipriani et al., 2017; Kamioka et al., 2014; Parkinson et al., 2011). It is hoped that this paper begins to bridge that gap and also outlines how recovery principles, gardening and woodwork can be incorporated into occupational therapy group programmes. This is of particular merit during the COVID-19 pandemic, which has led to a greater need for group intervention in outdoor settings, where social distancing can be comfortably facilitated.\n","PeriodicalId":36571,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijot-08-2021-0018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to evaluate the impact of an eight-week gardening and woodwork group programme on individuals’ recovery goals in an adult community mental health setting. Design/methodology/approach Seven individuals participated in the research. The programme was designed and facilitated by two occupational therapists (the authors) and one horticulture and trade skills facilitator. The goal attainment scale was used as a quantitative outcome measure as it allowed individuals to collaboratively set occupation-focused recovery-oriented goals. Due to the small sample size, descriptive statistics were used to analyse this data. Qualitative feedback was gathered through participant feedback forms when the programme ended. Findings Quantitative findings indicate positive results for individuals’ progression towards their recovery goals, with six out of seven participants either achieving or exceeding their goals. One person who attended only one out of eight groups had “worse than expected” goal achievement. Originality/value While there is evidence for the use of gardening and woodwork group therapy in mental health settings, most studies have relied on symptom-focused questionnaires or qualitative results rather than quantifiable recovery-oriented measures (Cipriani et al., 2017; Kamioka et al., 2014; Parkinson et al., 2011). It is hoped that this paper begins to bridge that gap and also outlines how recovery principles, gardening and woodwork can be incorporated into occupational therapy group programmes. This is of particular merit during the COVID-19 pandemic, which has led to a greater need for group intervention in outdoor settings, where social distancing can be comfortably facilitated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心理健康方面的园艺和木工小组:迈向康复的一步
目的评价一个为期八周的园艺和木工小组项目对成人社区心理健康环境中个体康复目标的影响。设计/方法/方法七个人参加了这项研究。该方案由两名职业治疗师(作者)和一名园艺和贸易技能促进者设计和促进。目标实现量表被用作定量结果测量,因为它允许个体协作设定以职业为中心的康复导向目标。由于样本量小,我们使用描述性统计来分析这些数据。在方案结束时,通过参与者反馈表格收集了定性反馈。定量研究结果表明,个人在实现康复目标方面取得了积极的进展,7名参与者中有6人达到或超过了他们的目标。有一个人只参加了八组中的一组,他的目标实现情况“比预期的要差”。原创性/价值虽然有证据表明在心理健康环境中使用园艺和木工团体疗法,但大多数研究依赖于以症状为中心的问卷调查或定性结果,而不是可量化的以恢复为导向的措施(Cipriani等人,2017;Kamioka等人,2014;Parkinson et al., 2011)。希望这篇论文能开始弥补这一差距,并概述了如何将恢复原则、园艺和木制品纳入职业治疗小组计划。这在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间尤其具有优势,这导致更需要在户外环境中进行群体干预,因为在户外环境中可以轻松地促进社交距离。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Irish Journal of Occupational Therapy
Irish Journal of Occupational Therapy Health Professions-Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Editorial: Driving innovation: harnessing the power of patient input in research Current clinical practice of Irish physiotherapists and occupational therapists in the assessment and treatment of spasticity in adults Scoping review of free evidence summary sources available online, relevant to occupational therapists working with children/youth, and families Exploring the non-vocational outcomes of the individual placement and support (IPS) employment model Attention Autism™ training for occupational therapists: a pilot study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1