Surgical video use and preparation for operative procedures among urology residents and fellows: Results from a national survey

IF 0.2 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Journal of Clinical Urology Pub Date : 2023-05-26 DOI:10.1177/20514158231175301
M. Movassaghi, Erick A Garza, G. Badalato, D. Chung
{"title":"Surgical video use and preparation for operative procedures among urology residents and fellows: Results from a national survey","authors":"M. Movassaghi, Erick A Garza, G. Badalato, D. Chung","doi":"10.1177/20514158231175301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The availability of surgical videos has changed the nature of learning outside the operating room. Within urology, there are limited reports on the use of surgical videos during training. This study sought to characterise both the preferred platforms and the utilization patterns of videos among a contemporary cohort of urology trainees. An anonymous survey was distributed by the Society of Academic Urologists to trainees in September 2021. Data prospectively collected included respondent demographics, video platforms utilized, perceived educational value, satisfaction, and overall time spent using videos for case preparation. In total, 169 urology residents and fellows completed the survey (23.6%). Nearly all (96.4%) respondents reported utilizing videos to prepare for cases, with 95.1% reporting videos as helpful for this purpose. YouTube (81.4%) and American Urological Association (AUA) University (16.3%) were the most common sources for video content. Video ‘narration’ was the most valued feature. When stratified by trainee level, 91.5% of senior residents/fellows reported using YouTube, compared with 56.6% of junior residents ( p < 0.005). Overall, approximately 4 out of 5 trainees ultimately recommend YouTube as a video resource, compared with 57% recommending AUA University ( p < 0.05). Most urology trainees report surgical videos as a crucial component of their training, preferring to access videos directly from the YouTube website. As the quality of videos from YouTube varies, finding ways to share quality educational content should remain a priority for the medical education community moving forward. Not applicable","PeriodicalId":15471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20514158231175301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The availability of surgical videos has changed the nature of learning outside the operating room. Within urology, there are limited reports on the use of surgical videos during training. This study sought to characterise both the preferred platforms and the utilization patterns of videos among a contemporary cohort of urology trainees. An anonymous survey was distributed by the Society of Academic Urologists to trainees in September 2021. Data prospectively collected included respondent demographics, video platforms utilized, perceived educational value, satisfaction, and overall time spent using videos for case preparation. In total, 169 urology residents and fellows completed the survey (23.6%). Nearly all (96.4%) respondents reported utilizing videos to prepare for cases, with 95.1% reporting videos as helpful for this purpose. YouTube (81.4%) and American Urological Association (AUA) University (16.3%) were the most common sources for video content. Video ‘narration’ was the most valued feature. When stratified by trainee level, 91.5% of senior residents/fellows reported using YouTube, compared with 56.6% of junior residents ( p < 0.005). Overall, approximately 4 out of 5 trainees ultimately recommend YouTube as a video resource, compared with 57% recommending AUA University ( p < 0.05). Most urology trainees report surgical videos as a crucial component of their training, preferring to access videos directly from the YouTube website. As the quality of videos from YouTube varies, finding ways to share quality educational content should remain a priority for the medical education community moving forward. Not applicable
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
泌尿外科住院医师和研究员手术录像的使用和手术准备:来自全国调查的结果
手术视频的可用性改变了手术室外学习的性质。在泌尿外科,关于在训练中使用手术视频的报道有限。本研究旨在描述当代泌尿学受训人员的首选平台和视频使用模式。学术泌尿科医师协会于2021年9月向实习生分发了一份匿名调查。前瞻性收集的数据包括受访者人口统计数据、使用的视频平台、感知的教育价值、满意度和使用视频进行案例准备的总时间。共有169名泌尿外科住院医师和研究员完成了调查(23.6%)。几乎所有(96.4%)的受访者都表示使用视频来准备案件,95.1%的受访者表示视频对此有帮助。YouTube(81.4%)和美国泌尿学会(AUA)大学(16.3%)是最常见的视频内容来源。视频“叙述”是最受重视的功能。当按实习生级别分层时,91.5%的高级住院医师/研究员报告使用YouTube,而56.6%的初级住院医师报告使用YouTube (p < 0.005)。总体而言,大约4 / 5的学员最终推荐YouTube作为视频资源,相比之下,57%的人推荐AUA University (p < 0.05)。大多数泌尿外科学员报告手术视频是他们培训的重要组成部分,他们更喜欢直接从YouTube网站上访问视频。由于YouTube视频的质量参差不齐,寻找分享高质量教育内容的方法应该仍然是医学教育界向前发展的优先事项。不适用
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Urology
Journal of Clinical Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic value of the abnormal digital rectal examination in the modern MRI-based prostate cancer diagnostic pathway. Comparison of the diagnostic utility of CHOKAI, STONE and STONE PLUS scores in predicting ureteral stones larger than 5 mm Quality of life and healthcare resource use in patients with bladder pain syndrome: A survey of UK patients Analysis of the learning curve for Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for a single surgeon Effectiveness of intravesical glycosaminoglycans in the treatment of recurrent urinary tract infections: Systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1