Effects of Electrolytes and Soil-to-suspension Ratios on pH in Acidic-coarse Textured Soil

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Indian Journal Of Agricultural Research Pub Date : 2023-07-04 DOI:10.18805/ijare.af-785
S. Butnan, P. Sriraj, B. Toomsan
{"title":"Effects of Electrolytes and Soil-to-suspension Ratios on pH in Acidic-coarse Textured Soil","authors":"S. Butnan, P. Sriraj, B. Toomsan","doi":"10.18805/ijare.af-785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Soil pH is determined using a variety of methods. The key differences among them are the electrolytes and soil-to-suspension ratios. However, an optimal procedure tailored to a particular soil is required. This study, therefore, aimed to evaluate the effects of electrolytes and soil-to-suspension ratios on soil pH and to optimise pH measurement methods for acidic-coarsely textured soil. Methods: Varied standard electrolytes (water, 0.01 M CaCl2 and 1 M KCl) and soil-to-suspension ratios (1:1, 1:2.5 and 1:5 w/v) were used to measure the pH of thirty samples of acidic-coarsest textured soil. Result: Soil pH values were observed in the following order: water greater than 0.01 M CaCl2 greater than 1 M KCI. Higher soil pHs were a result of higher suspension volumes. The most optimal pH measurement method for an acidic-coarsely textured soil was obtained from the 1:2.5 soil-to-suspension ratio of 1 M KCl, which held the highest R2 (0.850), as well as the lowest root mean square error (RMSE) (0.010), indicating the most precise method. An alternative method suitable for a cost-saving laboratory was the 1:1 soil-to-suspension ratio of 0.01 M CaCl2, which owned R2 of 0.766 and RMSE of 0.013, as its pH measurement was similar to those under the most optimal method.","PeriodicalId":13398,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal Of Agricultural Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal Of Agricultural Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18805/ijare.af-785","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Soil pH is determined using a variety of methods. The key differences among them are the electrolytes and soil-to-suspension ratios. However, an optimal procedure tailored to a particular soil is required. This study, therefore, aimed to evaluate the effects of electrolytes and soil-to-suspension ratios on soil pH and to optimise pH measurement methods for acidic-coarsely textured soil. Methods: Varied standard electrolytes (water, 0.01 M CaCl2 and 1 M KCl) and soil-to-suspension ratios (1:1, 1:2.5 and 1:5 w/v) were used to measure the pH of thirty samples of acidic-coarsest textured soil. Result: Soil pH values were observed in the following order: water greater than 0.01 M CaCl2 greater than 1 M KCI. Higher soil pHs were a result of higher suspension volumes. The most optimal pH measurement method for an acidic-coarsely textured soil was obtained from the 1:2.5 soil-to-suspension ratio of 1 M KCl, which held the highest R2 (0.850), as well as the lowest root mean square error (RMSE) (0.010), indicating the most precise method. An alternative method suitable for a cost-saving laboratory was the 1:1 soil-to-suspension ratio of 0.01 M CaCl2, which owned R2 of 0.766 and RMSE of 0.013, as its pH measurement was similar to those under the most optimal method.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电解质和土悬比对酸性-粗质土pH的影响
背景:土壤pH值的测定方法多种多样。它们之间的关键区别在于电解质和土壤与悬浮液的比率。然而,需要一种适合特定土壤的最佳程序。因此,本研究旨在评估电解质和土壤悬浮比对土壤pH的影响,并优化酸性粗糙土壤的pH测量方法。方法:采用不同的标准电解质(水、0.01 M CaCl2和1 M KCl)和土悬液比(1:1、1:2.5和1:5 w/v)测量30个酸性最粗质地土壤样品的pH值。结果:土壤pH值依次为:水> 0.01 M CaCl2 > 1 M KCI。较高的土壤ph值是悬浮体积增大的结果。对于酸性粗质土壤,以1 M KCl的土悬比1:2.5为最佳pH测量方法,其R2最高(0.850),均方根误差(RMSE)最低(0.010),是最精确的测量方法。另一种适合节省实验室成本的方法是1:1土悬比0.01 M CaCl2,由于其pH值与最优方法相似,其R2为0.766,RMSE为0.013。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Indian Journal Of Agricultural Research
Indian Journal Of Agricultural Research Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Soil Science
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
143
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Eco-enzymes and Husk Charcoal on the Growth of Vanilla Seeds Effect of Different Spacing Level and Growth Stages of Chekkurmanis (Sauropus androgynus L.) on Plant Growth An Analytical Study on Growth Performance of Major Food Grain and Oilseed Crops in Context of Food Security: Rajasthan, India Effect of Different Tillage Operations on Soil Water Storage, Water Use Efficiency and Productivity of Durum Wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) in Semi-arid Region Randomly Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) Molecular Markers as a Valuable Tool to Confirm the Genetic Diversity in Soybean Germplasms (Glycine max)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1