“I’ve changed my mind; I don’t want to go home”

IF 0.5 4区 艺术学 0 ARCHITECTURE Home Cultures Pub Date : 2017-01-02 DOI:10.1080/17406315.2017.1319596
H. Steiner, Kristin Veel
{"title":"“I’ve changed my mind; I don’t want to go home”","authors":"H. Steiner, Kristin Veel","doi":"10.1080/17406315.2017.1319596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article considers the motif of porosity and its opposite, impenetrability, in relation to the home or places where we feel at home. It discusses ambiguities in how the physical boundaries of the home—but also of the perceived human subject—are portrayed in the technology-pervaded world of the dystopian science fiction narrative Total Recall. Tracing the story from the 1966 novel by Philip K. Dick, through the 1990 film to the recent remake (2012), allows for a consideration of the changes in our understanding of how the boundaries between the home and its other are culturally conceived and what happens when the integrity of these boundaries are put into question. Despite their differences, we argue that all three narratives use the built structures of walls and the imagery of the container as a way of portraying the basic conflict of an outer world that tries to take possession of the protagonist’s inner life. Tracing narrative shifts, we suggest, can become a vehicle for understanding the ongoing negotiation of boundaries of the “self,” the human body, the home and even the city, and the implications these cultural negotiations have across the period from 1966 to 2012.","PeriodicalId":44765,"journal":{"name":"Home Cultures","volume":"14 1","pages":"73 - 94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17406315.2017.1319596","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Home Cultures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17406315.2017.1319596","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract This article considers the motif of porosity and its opposite, impenetrability, in relation to the home or places where we feel at home. It discusses ambiguities in how the physical boundaries of the home—but also of the perceived human subject—are portrayed in the technology-pervaded world of the dystopian science fiction narrative Total Recall. Tracing the story from the 1966 novel by Philip K. Dick, through the 1990 film to the recent remake (2012), allows for a consideration of the changes in our understanding of how the boundaries between the home and its other are culturally conceived and what happens when the integrity of these boundaries are put into question. Despite their differences, we argue that all three narratives use the built structures of walls and the imagery of the container as a way of portraying the basic conflict of an outer world that tries to take possession of the protagonist’s inner life. Tracing narrative shifts, we suggest, can become a vehicle for understanding the ongoing negotiation of boundaries of the “self,” the human body, the home and even the city, and the implications these cultural negotiations have across the period from 1966 to 2012.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“我改变主意了;我不想回家。”
本文考虑了多孔性的母题及其反义词,不可穿透性,与家或我们感到家的地方有关。它讨论了在反乌托邦的科幻小说《全面回忆》(Total Recall)中,技术无处不在的世界如何描绘家的物理边界——以及感知到的人类主体——的模糊性。从1966年菲利普·k·迪克(Philip K. Dick)的小说,到1990年的电影,再到最近的翻拍(2012年),追溯这个故事,可以考虑我们对家庭与其他者之间的界限如何在文化上被理解的理解的变化,以及当这些界限的完整性受到质疑时会发生什么。尽管存在差异,但我们认为,这三种叙事都使用了墙壁的建筑结构和容器的意象,作为描绘外部世界试图占有主人公内心生活的基本冲突的一种方式。我们认为,追踪叙事的转变,可以成为理解“自我”、人体、家庭甚至城市的边界正在进行的谈判的工具,以及这些文化谈判在1966年至2012年期间所产生的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Home Cultures
Home Cultures ARCHITECTURE-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
INSIDE RETIREMENT HOUSING: DESIGNING, DEVELOPING and SUSTAINING LATER LIFESTYLES Living With Things 15 Years on Thinglessness: Without Living Things Affective Clutter: Three Viewpoints on Lived Objects that Create Discomfort at Home Lose, Remain, Regain: Biographic Objects and Forced Migration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1