Incorporating Movements for Racial Justice into Planning and Management of U.S. National Parks

IF 0.7 Q4 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM Journal of Park and Recreation Administration Pub Date : 2022-01-12 DOI:10.18666/jpra-2021-11005
Jeff Rose, Aleksandra N. Pitt, Rose I. Verbos, Lark Weller
{"title":"Incorporating Movements for Racial Justice into Planning and Management of U.S. National Parks","authors":"Jeff Rose, Aleksandra N. Pitt, Rose I. Verbos, Lark Weller","doi":"10.18666/jpra-2021-11005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The National Park Service (NPS) is the federal land management agency responsible for 423 units across the United States. Many of these parks are considered iconic cultural and environmental landscapes. However, scholarship from a number of disciplinary approaches has positioned the national parks and their management as problematic, particularly from Indigenous and racial justice concerns. National parks, like many cultural landscapes in the U.S., are infused with racial relations, with unpleasant histories and contemporary experiences that have both subtle instances of marginalization and explicit episodes of material violence. Recent developments in racial justice movements raise fundamental questions for the social and political maintenance, stewardship, and sustainability of the NPS. In a critical approach that centers whiteness as a lens of institutional critique, we consider the ways that the NPS could more critically engage with racial justice approaches in its planning and management. After acknowledging that histories of U.S. national parks as spaces designed for White, upper class people led to the displacement and marginalization of Indigenous and people of color, we look to contemporary avenues for increased racial justice. Through both local, small-scale initiatives and agency-wide, national policies, we consider how racial justice movements are both expectant and galvanized in this moment, providing a setting for the NPS to redress and make amends for previous harms and missed opportunities. Specifically, we identify recent federal and institutional policy and legislation as promising mandates for progress. We identify specific place-based tactics used by individual NPS units, such as renaming parks and geographic features, or interpretation that is both more accurate and more inclusive of marginalized populations. Our research examines planning and management as potential strategic practices that can more fully highlight and progress racial justice. We offer a range of specific questions that might guide more inclusive planning and management work in the NPS. Finally, we encourage the NPS, as an institution, as well as individual park units, to support contemporary racial justice movements, while simultaneously adhering to the agency’s historical dual mandate.","PeriodicalId":46684,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Park and Recreation Administration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Park and Recreation Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18666/jpra-2021-11005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The National Park Service (NPS) is the federal land management agency responsible for 423 units across the United States. Many of these parks are considered iconic cultural and environmental landscapes. However, scholarship from a number of disciplinary approaches has positioned the national parks and their management as problematic, particularly from Indigenous and racial justice concerns. National parks, like many cultural landscapes in the U.S., are infused with racial relations, with unpleasant histories and contemporary experiences that have both subtle instances of marginalization and explicit episodes of material violence. Recent developments in racial justice movements raise fundamental questions for the social and political maintenance, stewardship, and sustainability of the NPS. In a critical approach that centers whiteness as a lens of institutional critique, we consider the ways that the NPS could more critically engage with racial justice approaches in its planning and management. After acknowledging that histories of U.S. national parks as spaces designed for White, upper class people led to the displacement and marginalization of Indigenous and people of color, we look to contemporary avenues for increased racial justice. Through both local, small-scale initiatives and agency-wide, national policies, we consider how racial justice movements are both expectant and galvanized in this moment, providing a setting for the NPS to redress and make amends for previous harms and missed opportunities. Specifically, we identify recent federal and institutional policy and legislation as promising mandates for progress. We identify specific place-based tactics used by individual NPS units, such as renaming parks and geographic features, or interpretation that is both more accurate and more inclusive of marginalized populations. Our research examines planning and management as potential strategic practices that can more fully highlight and progress racial justice. We offer a range of specific questions that might guide more inclusive planning and management work in the NPS. Finally, we encourage the NPS, as an institution, as well as individual park units, to support contemporary racial justice movements, while simultaneously adhering to the agency’s historical dual mandate.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将种族正义运动纳入美国国家公园的规划和管理
国家公园管理局(NPS)是联邦土地管理机构,负责美国各地的423个单位。其中许多公园被认为是标志性的文化和环境景观。然而,来自一些学科方法的学术研究将国家公园及其管理定位为有问题的,特别是从土著和种族正义方面考虑。国家公园,像美国的许多文化景观一样,充满了种族关系,不愉快的历史和当代经历,既有微妙的边缘化实例,也有明显的物质暴力事件。种族正义运动的最新发展对国家养老金计划的社会和政治维护、管理和可持续性提出了根本性的问题。在一种以白人为中心的批判性方法中,作为制度批判的镜头,我们考虑了NPS在其计划和管理中更批判性地参与种族正义方法的方式。在认识到美国国家公园作为为白人、上层阶级设计的空间的历史导致了土著居民和有色人种的流离失所和边缘化之后,我们将目光转向当代增加种族正义的途径。通过地方的小规模倡议和整个机构的国家政策,我们考虑种族正义运动在这一时刻是如何期待和激发的,为NPS纠正和弥补以前的伤害和错失的机会提供了一个环境。具体而言,我们认为最近的联邦和机构政策和立法是有希望取得进展的任务。我们确定了个别NPS单位使用的具体基于地点的策略,例如重新命名公园和地理特征,或者更准确、更包容边缘化人群的解释。我们的研究考察了计划和管理作为潜在的战略实践,可以更充分地突出和促进种族正义。我们提出了一系列具体问题,这些问题可能会指导国家养老金计划中更具包容性的规划和管理工作。最后,我们鼓励国家公园管理局作为一个机构,以及个别公园单位,支持当代种族正义运动,同时坚持该机构的历史双重使命。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Park and Recreation Administration
Journal of Park and Recreation Administration HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
23.10%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
The Management of Parks and Public Spaces in the Context of Unsheltered Homelessness: Perspectives from Three Key Stakeholder Groups Classifying Rural Parks: A Case Study in Iowa A Study of Parents’ Perceived Constraints on Participating in Outdoor Leisure Activities with Their Children in Japan Community-University Partnerships: The Benefits of Collaboration in Measuring Public Support for a Community Recreation Center s Recreation Part of the Story? Stakeholders’ Narratives about Youth Retention in a Rural State
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1