Extractive Logic of the Coloniality of Nature: Feeling-Thinking Through Agroecology as a Decolonial Project

Q1 Social Sciences Capitalism, Nature, Socialism Pub Date : 2022-09-26 DOI:10.1080/10455752.2022.2127416
Jhon Jairo Losada Cubillos, Hernán Felipe Trujillo Quintero, Leyson Jimmy Lugo Perea
{"title":"Extractive Logic of the Coloniality of Nature: Feeling-Thinking Through Agroecology as a Decolonial Project","authors":"Jhon Jairo Losada Cubillos, Hernán Felipe Trujillo Quintero, Leyson Jimmy Lugo Perea","doi":"10.1080/10455752.2022.2127416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The following paper intends to discuss the effects of colonial power on nature, especially on the understanding of agriculture from the dialogue between decolonial approach and agroecology. It addresses the potential of agroecology within decolonial activities mainly in three scenarios: (i) the epistemological, as an alternative to scientific rationality; (ii) the political, as an alternative to the hegemony imposed by racial and patriarchal criteria; and (iii) the ontological, as an alternative to the dualist, individualist and atomizing of modernity. The main thesis is that the notions about “nature” and “environment”, which are associated with agricultural practices and capitalist-type practices, are consequences of power relations that are inscribed in the modernity- coloniality relationship and can be understood as epistemological and ontological assumptions based on an extractive logic. Finally, the importance of political work (or defiance) is discussed from the perspective of relationality and the pluri-verse in which agroecology can be a transformative option of decoloniality.","PeriodicalId":39549,"journal":{"name":"Capitalism, Nature, Socialism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Capitalism, Nature, Socialism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2022.2127416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT The following paper intends to discuss the effects of colonial power on nature, especially on the understanding of agriculture from the dialogue between decolonial approach and agroecology. It addresses the potential of agroecology within decolonial activities mainly in three scenarios: (i) the epistemological, as an alternative to scientific rationality; (ii) the political, as an alternative to the hegemony imposed by racial and patriarchal criteria; and (iii) the ontological, as an alternative to the dualist, individualist and atomizing of modernity. The main thesis is that the notions about “nature” and “environment”, which are associated with agricultural practices and capitalist-type practices, are consequences of power relations that are inscribed in the modernity- coloniality relationship and can be understood as epistemological and ontological assumptions based on an extractive logic. Finally, the importance of political work (or defiance) is discussed from the perspective of relationality and the pluri-verse in which agroecology can be a transformative option of decoloniality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自然殖民性的提取逻辑:通过农业生态学作为一个非殖民化项目的感受与思考
摘要本文旨在从非殖民化方法与农业生态学的对话中,探讨殖民权力对自然的影响,尤其是对农业的理解。它主要在三个方面探讨了非殖民化活动中农业生态学的潜力:(i)认识论,作为科学理性的替代品;(ii)政治,作为种族和父权标准强加的霸权的替代方案;以及(iii)本体论,作为对现代性的二元论、个人主义和雾化的替代。主要论点是,与农业实践和资本主义实践相关的“自然”和“环境”概念是现代性-殖民性关系中所包含的权力关系的结果,可以理解为基于提取逻辑的认识论和本体论假设。最后,从关系性和多元宇宙的角度讨论了政治工作(或反抗)的重要性,在多元宇宙中,农业生态学可以成为非殖民化的变革选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Capitalism, Nature, Socialism
Capitalism, Nature, Socialism Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: CNS is a journal of ecosocialism. We welcome submissions on red-green politics and the anti-globalization movement; environmental history; workplace labor struggles; land/community struggles; political economy of ecology; and other themes in political ecology. CNS especially wants to join (relate) discourses on labor, feminist, and environmental movements, and theories of political ecology and radical democracy. Works on ecology and socialism are particularly welcome.
期刊最新文献
The Political Implications of Unequal Exchange: Towards a Common Agenda for Global Social Movements State of Exception, Necropolitics, and Puerto Rico: Naturalizing Disaster and Naturalizing Difference The Quest for Revolutionary Love: John P. Clark Interviews Javier Sethness about Queer Tolstoy Beyond Trash and Garbage: Shifting Perspectives on Discard Discard studies: wasting, systems, and power , Max Liboiron and Josh Lepawsky, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 2022, 212 pages, $30 (paperback), ISBN: 9780262543651 Rooted-South Feminisms: Disobedient Epistemologies and Transformative Politics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1