Evolutionary Approaches to Innovation, the Firm, and the Dynamics of Industries

IF 2.9 Q2 MANAGEMENT Strategy Science Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.1287/stsc.2021.0141
G. Cattani, F. Malerba
{"title":"Evolutionary Approaches to Innovation, the Firm, and the Dynamics of Industries","authors":"G. Cattani, F. Malerba","doi":"10.1287/stsc.2021.0141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We examine the progress of the evolutionary research on innovation, the firm, and the dynamics of industries in the last four decades. The paper acknowledges that the themes related to knowledge and technological regimes, the evolutionary processes leading to innovation, and the long-term dynamics of technologies have generated, and still remain, relevant research trajectories. The same can be said for the research trajectories on organizational and dynamic capabilities, evolutionary strategies, vertical integration, diversification, niche construction, and authority and power in organizations. Important progress has also been made in understanding the evolutionary trajectories of industries, the link between industry architecture and industry dynamics, the types of knowledge of entrants, the role of focal and vertical spinouts, the relevance of institutions and sectoral innovation systems in industry dynamics, and the catch-up process by firms from latecomer countries. We argue that future developments in the evolutionary camp should continue to be characterized by eclecticism and multidisciplinarity, as well as by the integration of different methodologies from cases to stylized facts, quantitative analyses, appreciative theorizing, and formal modelling. We conclude with an analysis of the main methodologies used by evolutionary scholars and a discussion of the road ahead.","PeriodicalId":45295,"journal":{"name":"Strategy Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategy Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2021.0141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

We examine the progress of the evolutionary research on innovation, the firm, and the dynamics of industries in the last four decades. The paper acknowledges that the themes related to knowledge and technological regimes, the evolutionary processes leading to innovation, and the long-term dynamics of technologies have generated, and still remain, relevant research trajectories. The same can be said for the research trajectories on organizational and dynamic capabilities, evolutionary strategies, vertical integration, diversification, niche construction, and authority and power in organizations. Important progress has also been made in understanding the evolutionary trajectories of industries, the link between industry architecture and industry dynamics, the types of knowledge of entrants, the role of focal and vertical spinouts, the relevance of institutions and sectoral innovation systems in industry dynamics, and the catch-up process by firms from latecomer countries. We argue that future developments in the evolutionary camp should continue to be characterized by eclecticism and multidisciplinarity, as well as by the integration of different methodologies from cases to stylized facts, quantitative analyses, appreciative theorizing, and formal modelling. We conclude with an analysis of the main methodologies used by evolutionary scholars and a discussion of the road ahead.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创新、企业和产业动态的演化方法
本文考察了近四十年来关于创新、企业和产业动态的演化研究的进展。本文承认,与知识和技术制度、导致创新的进化过程以及技术的长期动态相关的主题已经产生了相关的研究轨迹,并且仍然存在。组织与动态能力、进化战略、垂直整合、多元化、生态位构建、组织权威与权力的研究轨迹也是如此。在了解工业的演变轨迹、工业结构与工业动态之间的联系、进入者的知识类型、重点和垂直衍生品的作用、制度和部门创新系统在工业动态中的相关性以及来自后发国家的公司的追赶过程方面也取得了重要进展。我们认为,进化阵营的未来发展应继续以折衷主义和多学科为特征,并通过从案例到程式化事实、定量分析、鉴赏理论和形式化建模的不同方法的整合。最后,我们分析了进化学者使用的主要方法,并讨论了未来的道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Strategy Science
Strategy Science MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.10%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
Airline Responses to the COVID-19 Collapse: Applying Learning to an Unprecedented Crisis Innovation Disclosures and the Design of Technology Acquisition Contracts: Evidence from the American Inventors Protection Act How Demand Shocks “Jumpstart” Technological Ecosystems and Commercialization: Evidence from the Global Electric Vehicle Industry How Firms Cultivate Collaboration During Postmerger Integration of Technology Acquisitions Who Captures the Value from Organizational Ratings?: Evidence from Public Schools
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1