The effects of a specialized staff training on trauma-sensitivity in professionals working with patients with a psychotic disorder: A pilot study

M. Visser, N. Boonstra, P. de Bont, B. M. van der Vleugel, D. V. D. van den Berg
{"title":"The effects of a specialized staff training on trauma-sensitivity in professionals working with patients with a psychotic disorder: A pilot study","authors":"M. Visser, N. Boonstra, P. de Bont, B. M. van der Vleugel, D. V. D. van den Berg","doi":"10.1080/17522439.2021.1994635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background Studies show that the trauma-sensitivity of professionals working with patients with psychosis is insufficient. As a result, trauma-related problems remain undetected and untreated, which may impede recovery in this group. This study explored the effects of a specialised staff training on six trauma-sensitivity factors (i.e. knowledge, credibility, expected burden, harm expectancy, diagnostic competency and organizational support), self-reported trauma-sensitive behaviour and objective indicators of trauma-sensitive behaviour in medical files. Method Professionals (N = 56) rated the six trauma-sensitivity factors and their own trauma-sensitive behaviour at pre-training, post-training and at 6- and 12-months follow-up. Changes in indicators of trauma-sensitive behaviours were assessed by a review of medical files (N = 97). Results The specialized training increased knowledge, crediblity and experienced diagnostic compentence. The training decreased burden and harm expectancies, and enhanced self-reported trauma-sensitive behaviour. However, this positive change could not be objectified by indicators of trauma-sensitive behaviour in medical files. Discussion These findings support the notion that specialised training has a positive effect on increasing trauma-sensitivity and decreasing burden and harm expectancies, but not necessarily on observable trauma-sensitive behaviour. In addition to training staff, structural implementation and organisational support are argued to be essential to attain actual behaviour change.","PeriodicalId":46344,"journal":{"name":"Psychosis-Psychological Social and Integrative Approaches","volume":"14 1","pages":"308 - 321"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychosis-Psychological Social and Integrative Approaches","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17522439.2021.1994635","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Studies show that the trauma-sensitivity of professionals working with patients with psychosis is insufficient. As a result, trauma-related problems remain undetected and untreated, which may impede recovery in this group. This study explored the effects of a specialised staff training on six trauma-sensitivity factors (i.e. knowledge, credibility, expected burden, harm expectancy, diagnostic competency and organizational support), self-reported trauma-sensitive behaviour and objective indicators of trauma-sensitive behaviour in medical files. Method Professionals (N = 56) rated the six trauma-sensitivity factors and their own trauma-sensitive behaviour at pre-training, post-training and at 6- and 12-months follow-up. Changes in indicators of trauma-sensitive behaviours were assessed by a review of medical files (N = 97). Results The specialized training increased knowledge, crediblity and experienced diagnostic compentence. The training decreased burden and harm expectancies, and enhanced self-reported trauma-sensitive behaviour. However, this positive change could not be objectified by indicators of trauma-sensitive behaviour in medical files. Discussion These findings support the notion that specialised training has a positive effect on increasing trauma-sensitivity and decreasing burden and harm expectancies, but not necessarily on observable trauma-sensitive behaviour. In addition to training staff, structural implementation and organisational support are argued to be essential to attain actual behaviour change.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
专业人员对精神障碍患者创伤敏感性培训的效果:一项试点研究
背景研究表明,与精神病患者一起工作的专业人员的创伤敏感性不足。因此,与创伤有关的问题仍未被发现和治疗,这可能会阻碍这一群体的康复。本研究探讨了专业人员培训对医疗档案中六个创伤敏感因素(即知识、可信度、预期负担、预期伤害、诊断能力和组织支持)、自我报告的创伤敏感行为和创伤敏感行为客观指标的影响。方法对56名专业人员在训练前、训练后、6个月和12个月随访时对6项创伤敏感因素和自身创伤敏感行为进行评分。通过对医疗档案的回顾评估创伤敏感行为指标的变化(N = 97)。结果专业培训提高了知识水平、可信度和经验诊断能力。训练降低了负担和伤害预期,增强了自我报告的创伤敏感行为。然而,这种积极的变化不能通过医疗档案中创伤敏感行为的指标客观化。这些发现支持了这样一种观点,即专业培训对增加创伤敏感性和减少负担和伤害预期有积极作用,但不一定对可观察到的创伤敏感性行为有积极作用。除了培训工作人员外,结构性实施和组织支持被认为是实现实际行为改变的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
A mixed-methods validation of the 15-item English version of the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery (QPR) in an adult mental health inpatient rehabilitation setting Exploring service users’ and practitioners’ priorities regarding outcomes of cognitive behavioural therapy for distressing voices: a thematic analysis The association between social identity and paranoia through the mediators of trust and hostile attribution bias in a UK general population study Exploring personal accounts of the facilitators and barriers to seeking help for first-episode psychosis (FEP): a meta-ethnography A book review of Crash: a memoir of overmedication and recovery A book review of Crash: a memoir of overmedication and recovery , by Ann Bracken, Simpsonville, MD, Charing Cross Press, 2023, 227 pp., $18.00 (paperback), ISBN: 978057839433-6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1