Analysing demands for the clear widths of lattice bars in horse husbandry

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Landtechnik Pub Date : 2020-01-31 DOI:10.15150/LT.2020.3229
Fiona Osman, Zeitler-Feicht Margit, Georg W. Fink, Stefanie Arnhard, Konstanze Krüger
{"title":"Analysing demands for the clear widths of lattice bars in horse husbandry","authors":"Fiona Osman, Zeitler-Feicht Margit, Georg W. Fink, Stefanie Arnhard, Konstanze Krüger","doi":"10.15150/LT.2020.3229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At bars, used in various places in horse husbandry, horses can hurt themselves when retracting their heads or hooves after pushing them through the interspaces. In order to reduce the risk of injury, the clear widths and material thicknesses of bars should be chosen so that horse heads and hooves either cannot pass between the spaces or can be retracted safely. However, research to date has not provided any reliable information on bar width (vertical and horizontal) that is safe for horses. Grid bar width used in practice and recommended in the literature is based on empirical values and technical material properties. In this study, heads and hooves of 480 horses (233 mares, 204 geldings and 43 stallions) of 23 breeds were measured for making statements about the suitability of standard bar width, when considering the anatomy of the horse. It turned out that for vertical bars, an interspace of no more than five centimetres can be considered to be safe for all horses of a height of 110 centimetres and an age of two years and more. With horizontal lattice bars, a clear width of exactly 17 centimetres proved to be safe. This applies to all horses of a height of 148 centimetres and an age of two years or more. The clear widths of panels must be considered critical for horse welfare. When horses, for example, try to eat outside the panels and put their head through the bars, they may get stuck.","PeriodicalId":35524,"journal":{"name":"Landtechnik","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landtechnik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15150/LT.2020.3229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

At bars, used in various places in horse husbandry, horses can hurt themselves when retracting their heads or hooves after pushing them through the interspaces. In order to reduce the risk of injury, the clear widths and material thicknesses of bars should be chosen so that horse heads and hooves either cannot pass between the spaces or can be retracted safely. However, research to date has not provided any reliable information on bar width (vertical and horizontal) that is safe for horses. Grid bar width used in practice and recommended in the literature is based on empirical values and technical material properties. In this study, heads and hooves of 480 horses (233 mares, 204 geldings and 43 stallions) of 23 breeds were measured for making statements about the suitability of standard bar width, when considering the anatomy of the horse. It turned out that for vertical bars, an interspace of no more than five centimetres can be considered to be safe for all horses of a height of 110 centimetres and an age of two years and more. With horizontal lattice bars, a clear width of exactly 17 centimetres proved to be safe. This applies to all horses of a height of 148 centimetres and an age of two years or more. The clear widths of panels must be considered critical for horse welfare. When horses, for example, try to eat outside the panels and put their head through the bars, they may get stuck.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
浅析畜牧业对栅条净宽度的要求
在许多地方用于马业的栅栏里,马在把它们推过栅栏间隙后缩回头或蹄子时可能会伤到自己。为了减少受伤的风险,栏杆的明确宽度和材料厚度的选择应该使马头和马蹄不能在空间之间通过或可以安全地缩回。然而,迄今为止的研究还没有提供任何可靠的信息,关于栏杆宽度(垂直和水平)对马是安全的。实践中使用的和文献中推荐的栅格条宽度是基于经验值和技术材料特性。本研究测量了23个品种的480匹马(233匹母马、204匹幼马和43匹公马)的头部和蹄子,在考虑马的解剖结构的情况下,对标准杆宽的适用性进行了陈述。结果表明,对于垂直栏杆来说,对于身高110厘米、年龄在两岁及以上的所有马来说,不超过5厘米的间距被认为是安全的。对于水平格栅,17厘米的净宽度被证明是安全的。这适用于所有身高为148厘米,年龄为两岁或两岁以上的马。护板的净宽度对马的福利至关重要。例如,当马试图在栅栏外吃东西并将头伸进栅栏时,它们可能会被卡住。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Landtechnik
Landtechnik Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Untersuchung zur Desintegration von Gärmedien in einer parallel betriebenen Pilotbiogasanlage Umsetzung einer prädiktiven Fahrstrategie durch radarbasierte Steigungserkennung in Traktoren Development and evaluation of a device to incorporate biodegradable textiles into sports turfs Gärrestaufbereitung als Beitrag zur Nährstoffentfrachtung von Überschussregionen – Kosten und Treibhausgasemissionen Food-scanner applications in the fruit and vegetable sector
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1