Beyond intimate partner relationships: utilising domestic homicide reviews to prevent adult family domestic homicide

IF 1.7 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Journal of Gender-Based Violence Pub Date : 2021-10-18 DOI:10.1332/239868021x16316184865237
K. Bracewell, Cassandra Jones, Alina Haines-Delmont, Elaine Craig, J. Duxbury, K. Chantler
{"title":"Beyond intimate partner relationships: utilising domestic homicide reviews to prevent adult family domestic homicide","authors":"K. Bracewell, Cassandra Jones, Alina Haines-Delmont, Elaine Craig, J. Duxbury, K. Chantler","doi":"10.1332/239868021x16316184865237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Increasing evidence documents domestic violence and abuse (DVA) and domestic homicide of adults killed by a relative in non-intimate partner relationships. Most literature focuses on intimate partner violence and homicide, yet non-intimate partner homicides form a substantial but neglected minority of domestic homicides. This article addresses this gap by presenting an analysis from 66 domestic homicide reviews (DHRs) in England and Wales where the victim and perpetrator were related, such as parent and adult child. Intimate partner homicides are excluded. These 66 DHRs were a sub-sample drawn from a larger study examining 317 DHRs in England and Wales.The article contributes towards greater understanding of the prevalence, context and characteristics of adult family homicide (AFH). Analysis revealed five interlinked precursors to AFH: mental health and substance/alcohol misuse, criminal history, childhood trauma, economic factors and care dynamics. Findings indicate that, given their contact with both victims and perpetrators, criminal justice agencies, adult social care and health agencies, particularly mental health services, are ideally placed to identify important risk and contextual factors. Understanding of DVA needs to extend to include adult family violence. Risk assessments need to be cognisant of the complex dynamics of AFH and must consider social-structural and relational-contextual factors.Key messagesUnderstanding of domestic violence and abuse needs to include adult family violence.Risks and dynamics of adult family homicide are complex and must consider social-structural and relational-contextual factors.Criminal justice agencies, social care, substance misuse and mental health services provide opportunities for prevention.\n","PeriodicalId":42166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gender-Based Violence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gender-Based Violence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/239868021x16316184865237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Increasing evidence documents domestic violence and abuse (DVA) and domestic homicide of adults killed by a relative in non-intimate partner relationships. Most literature focuses on intimate partner violence and homicide, yet non-intimate partner homicides form a substantial but neglected minority of domestic homicides. This article addresses this gap by presenting an analysis from 66 domestic homicide reviews (DHRs) in England and Wales where the victim and perpetrator were related, such as parent and adult child. Intimate partner homicides are excluded. These 66 DHRs were a sub-sample drawn from a larger study examining 317 DHRs in England and Wales.The article contributes towards greater understanding of the prevalence, context and characteristics of adult family homicide (AFH). Analysis revealed five interlinked precursors to AFH: mental health and substance/alcohol misuse, criminal history, childhood trauma, economic factors and care dynamics. Findings indicate that, given their contact with both victims and perpetrators, criminal justice agencies, adult social care and health agencies, particularly mental health services, are ideally placed to identify important risk and contextual factors. Understanding of DVA needs to extend to include adult family violence. Risk assessments need to be cognisant of the complex dynamics of AFH and must consider social-structural and relational-contextual factors.Key messagesUnderstanding of domestic violence and abuse needs to include adult family violence.Risks and dynamics of adult family homicide are complex and must consider social-structural and relational-contextual factors.Criminal justice agencies, social care, substance misuse and mental health services provide opportunities for prevention.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越亲密伴侣关系:利用家庭凶杀审查预防成人家庭凶杀
越来越多的证据记录了在非亲密伴侣关系中被亲属杀害的成年人的家庭暴力和虐待(DVA)以及家庭谋杀。大多数文献都关注亲密伴侣暴力和凶杀案,但非亲密伴侣凶杀案在家庭凶杀案中占了相当大但被忽视的少数。本文通过对英格兰和威尔士66起家庭凶杀案审查(DHR)的分析来解决这一差距,在这些审查中,受害者和犯罪者有亲属关系,如父母和成年子女。亲密伴侣杀人案除外。这66个DHR是从一项更大的研究中抽取的子样本,该研究对英格兰和威尔士的317个DHR进行了调查。这篇文章有助于更好地了解成人家庭凶杀(AFH)的流行率、背景和特征。分析揭示了AFH的五个相互关联的前兆:心理健康和药物/酒精滥用、犯罪史、儿童创伤、经济因素和护理动态。调查结果表明,鉴于刑事司法机构、成人社会护理和卫生机构,特别是心理健康服务机构与受害者和犯罪者都有联系,因此,它们最适合确定重要的风险和背景因素。对DVA的理解需要扩大到包括成人家庭暴力。风险评估需要认识到AFH的复杂动态,必须考虑社会结构和关系背景因素。关键信息了解家庭暴力和虐待需要包括成人家庭暴力。成人家庭凶杀的风险和动态是复杂的,必须考虑社会结构和关系背景因素。刑事司法机构、社会护理、药物滥用和心理健康服务提供了预防的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
49
期刊最新文献
‘I’m terrified of becoming a headline’: an exhibition responding to GBV in Ireland ‘I’m terrified of becoming a headline’: an exhibition responding to GBV in Ireland Does a history with sexual assault impact bystander intervention engagement? An analysis of the risk factors for intimate partner sexual violence against women and girls in Mexico Resilience and agency in children living with domestic abuse: an alternative interpretation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1