Ambiguous Musical Practice: Rethinking Social Analysis of Music Educational Practice

Kim Boeskov
{"title":"Ambiguous Musical Practice: Rethinking Social Analysis of Music Educational Practice","authors":"Kim Boeskov","doi":"10.2979/philmusieducrevi.30.2.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Music education holds an ambiguous relationship to social justice and social change; it is both complicit in perpetuating relations of inequality and a potential force for positive change. There is a need to turn the ambiguity of music’s social function—the simultaneous production of transformative and reproductive social processes—into the foundational premise of social analysis of music educational practice. Based on a discussion of ideas derived from social theory, feminist philosophy, and critical musicology concerning the performative constitution of agency and sociality, the notion of ambiguous musical practice is put forward as an analytical lens suited for exploring music’s social significance. The notion points to three interlocking dimensions of musical practice: bidirectionality (how music making may at once lead to destabilization and consolidation of social norms); multiplicity of social meanings (how music making produces multiple social meanings and therefore also may produce [contradictory] social effects on different levels of sociality); and in-betweenness (how music making may place participants in a state ‘in-between,’ understood as a social space where multiple identities, relations, and meanings can be both performed and imposed in ways that render them indeterminate). Inthis way, the notion of ambiguous musical practice may inform critical social analyses of music educational practice.","PeriodicalId":43479,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy of Music Education Review","volume":"30 1","pages":"163 - 182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy of Music Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/philmusieducrevi.30.2.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract:Music education holds an ambiguous relationship to social justice and social change; it is both complicit in perpetuating relations of inequality and a potential force for positive change. There is a need to turn the ambiguity of music’s social function—the simultaneous production of transformative and reproductive social processes—into the foundational premise of social analysis of music educational practice. Based on a discussion of ideas derived from social theory, feminist philosophy, and critical musicology concerning the performative constitution of agency and sociality, the notion of ambiguous musical practice is put forward as an analytical lens suited for exploring music’s social significance. The notion points to three interlocking dimensions of musical practice: bidirectionality (how music making may at once lead to destabilization and consolidation of social norms); multiplicity of social meanings (how music making produces multiple social meanings and therefore also may produce [contradictory] social effects on different levels of sociality); and in-betweenness (how music making may place participants in a state ‘in-between,’ understood as a social space where multiple identities, relations, and meanings can be both performed and imposed in ways that render them indeterminate). Inthis way, the notion of ambiguous musical practice may inform critical social analyses of music educational practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
暧昧的音乐实践:音乐教育实践的社会分析再思考
摘要:音乐教育与社会正义、社会变革的关系是模糊的;它既是维持不平等关系的同谋,也是推动积极变革的潜在力量。有必要将音乐的社会功能的模糊性——同时产生变革性和再生性的社会过程——转变为音乐教育实践的社会分析的基本前提。本文通过对来自社会理论、女性主义哲学和批判音乐学的关于能动性和社会性的表演构成的观点的讨论,提出了模糊音乐实践的概念,作为探索音乐的社会意义的分析镜头。这一概念指出了音乐实践的三个相互关联的维度:双向性(音乐创作如何同时导致社会规范的不稳定和巩固);社会意义的多样性(音乐创作如何产生多重社会意义,因此也可能在不同的社会性层面上产生[矛盾的]社会影响);以及中间性(音乐创作如何将参与者置于一种“中间”状态,被理解为一种社会空间,在这种空间中,多种身份、关系和意义都可以以使其不确定的方式表现和强加)。通过这种方式,模糊音乐实践的概念可以为音乐教育实践的批判性社会分析提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Opening Up to the Unexpected: Reclaiming Emotion and Power in the Public Space of Music Education 中国音乐教育与国际音乐教育 [Chinese Music Education and International Music Education] by Jianhua Guan (review) Music for All or Partisan Advocacy? Exploring Socialized Epistemologies Musik–Vielfalt–Integration–Inklusion: Musikdidaktik für die eine Schule [Music–Diversity–Inclusion–Integration: A New Philosophy of Music Education for an Inclusive School] by Irmgard Merkt (review) Editorial Reflections on Philosophizing in Music Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1