Intimate Partner Violence in Denmark: a Study of Offending Patterns Based on Official Statistics

Kristian Moesgaard Loewenstein, Vincent Harinam, B. Ariel
{"title":"Intimate Partner Violence in Denmark: a Study of Offending Patterns Based on Official Statistics","authors":"Kristian Moesgaard Loewenstein, Vincent Harinam, B. Ariel","doi":"10.1163/15718174-bja10036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Danish studies of intimate partner violence (ipv) using police data are scarce, in part because access to records had been limited. The present study reduces critical gaps in the scholarly literature by examining ipv offending patterns in Denmark, using nearly 10,000 ipv incidents reported to the North Zealand Police, Denmark (2015–2019). We explore a common framework for analysing ipv, by observing (a) frequency, (b) severity, (c) intermittency, (d) escalation, and (e) concentrations of ipv. Harm is estimated using the Danish Crime Harm Index, which is based on the sentencing guidelines as an objective rod for estimating severity. Findings support the gender-based explanation for ipv, with males causing considerably more and higher harm than female offenders. Furthermore, the likelihood of re-offending only predicable not for 1/3 of the ipv offender population and rarely for high-harm incidents as they usually have no prior or no subsequent contact with the police. While there is a tendency towards escalation of harm between contacts to the police for all offenders, no such consistent pattern is discernible for ipv offenders who cause serious harm to their victims. Implications for policy and future research are discussed.","PeriodicalId":43762,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Crime Criminal Law and Criminal Justice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Crime Criminal Law and Criminal Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718174-bja10036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Danish studies of intimate partner violence (ipv) using police data are scarce, in part because access to records had been limited. The present study reduces critical gaps in the scholarly literature by examining ipv offending patterns in Denmark, using nearly 10,000 ipv incidents reported to the North Zealand Police, Denmark (2015–2019). We explore a common framework for analysing ipv, by observing (a) frequency, (b) severity, (c) intermittency, (d) escalation, and (e) concentrations of ipv. Harm is estimated using the Danish Crime Harm Index, which is based on the sentencing guidelines as an objective rod for estimating severity. Findings support the gender-based explanation for ipv, with males causing considerably more and higher harm than female offenders. Furthermore, the likelihood of re-offending only predicable not for 1/3 of the ipv offender population and rarely for high-harm incidents as they usually have no prior or no subsequent contact with the police. While there is a tendency towards escalation of harm between contacts to the police for all offenders, no such consistent pattern is discernible for ipv offenders who cause serious harm to their victims. Implications for policy and future research are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
丹麦亲密伴侣暴力:基于官方统计的犯罪模式研究
丹麦利用警方数据对亲密伴侣暴力进行的研究很少,部分原因是查阅记录的机会有限。本研究利用2015-2019年向丹麦新西兰警方报告的近1万起ipv事件,研究了丹麦ipv犯罪模式,从而缩小了学术文献中的关键空白。我们通过观察ipv的(a)频率,(b)严重程度,(c)间歇性,(d)升级和(e)浓度,探索了一个分析ipv的共同框架。危害是使用丹麦犯罪危害指数来估计的,该指数以量刑指南为基础,作为估计严重性的客观标准。研究结果支持基于性别的ipv解释,男性比女性犯罪者造成的伤害更多、更高。此外,只有三分之一的ipv罪犯再犯的可能性是可预测的,而且很少发生高伤害事件,因为他们通常没有事先或事后与警察联系。虽然对所有罪犯来说,与警察接触之间的伤害都有升级的趋势,但对对受害者造成严重伤害的ipv罪犯来说,没有这种一致的模式。对政策和未来研究的影响进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
The Right to a Court in Cases of Administrative Liability of a Penal Character in the Field of the Protection of Financial Markets and Competition in German, French and English Law Collaborators of Justice: Consensual Procedural Forms Serving Probative Purposes Analysed Through Practitioners’ Experiences in Croatia The ‘Total-Legalization’ of Cannabis in Germany: Legal Challenges and the EU Free Market Conundrum Comparative Criminology and Comparative Criminal Justice in Contemporary Crime and Social Control Research – a Brief Overview Examining the Role of Age at Entrance in Foreign Detention for Dutch Prisoners’ Reoffending Behavior After Release
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1