Roger Bacon’s De signis, a missing part of Opus Maius III, and the “knowledge of languages”

Q3 Arts and Humanities Revista Espanola de Filosofia Medieval Pub Date : 2022-02-25 DOI:10.21071/refime.v28i1.14029
Irène Rosier Catach
{"title":"Roger Bacon’s De signis, a missing part of Opus Maius III, and the “knowledge of languages”","authors":"Irène Rosier Catach","doi":"10.21071/refime.v28i1.14029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Roger Bacon’s De signis is a major contribution to the history of semantics. However, we know from the author's summary given in the Opus tertium that it has come down to us in an incomplete form. It belongs to the third part of Bacon’s Opus maius, devoted to the “knowledge of languages”. The three sections of the summary in the Opus tertium enable us to understand its organization. The first section presents various arguments in favor of knowledge of languages. The major part of the second section of the summary is related to the “power of words”, which was originally present in the section on mathematics and magic (Opus maius IV). The third section is not present is the edition of Opus maius III: it was devoted to the study of signs and signification, which corresponds to the De signis, and circulated independently, and to its application to theology, a section that has not been found. Just as the late Compendium studii theologiae, the De signis offers an original treatment of semantic and linguistic questions which are fully embedded in the sophisticated debates that took place in the faculties of arts in Paris and Oxford during the second half of the 13th century. Bacon’s linguistic analysis can be equally relevant for the study of the Bible and theology.","PeriodicalId":52211,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola de Filosofia Medieval","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola de Filosofia Medieval","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21071/refime.v28i1.14029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Roger Bacon’s De signis is a major contribution to the history of semantics. However, we know from the author's summary given in the Opus tertium that it has come down to us in an incomplete form. It belongs to the third part of Bacon’s Opus maius, devoted to the “knowledge of languages”. The three sections of the summary in the Opus tertium enable us to understand its organization. The first section presents various arguments in favor of knowledge of languages. The major part of the second section of the summary is related to the “power of words”, which was originally present in the section on mathematics and magic (Opus maius IV). The third section is not present is the edition of Opus maius III: it was devoted to the study of signs and signification, which corresponds to the De signis, and circulated independently, and to its application to theology, a section that has not been found. Just as the late Compendium studii theologiae, the De signis offers an original treatment of semantic and linguistic questions which are fully embedded in the sophisticated debates that took place in the faculties of arts in Paris and Oxford during the second half of the 13th century. Bacon’s linguistic analysis can be equally relevant for the study of the Bible and theology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
罗杰·培根的《signis》,《主业三》中缺失的部分,以及“语言知识”
罗杰·培根的《符号学》是对语义学史的重要贡献。然而,我们从作者在《第三篇作品》中的总结中知道,它是以一种不完整的形式流传下来的。它属于培根《第三部分作品》的第三部分,致力于“语言知识”。第三篇文章摘要的三个部分使我们能够理解其组织结构。第一节介绍了支持语言知识的各种论点。摘要第二节的主要部分与“文字的力量”有关,它最初出现在数学和魔法部分(Opus maius IV)。第三部分没有出现是Opus maius III的版本:它致力于符号和意义的研究,这与De signis相对应,并独立流传,以及它在神学中的应用,这一部分尚未找到。正如晚期的《神学研究简编》一样,《符号学》对语义和语言问题进行了独创性的处理,这些问题完全嵌入了13世纪下半叶巴黎和牛津艺术学院发生的复杂辩论中。培根的语言学分析同样适用于圣经和神学的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Espanola de Filosofia Medieval
Revista Espanola de Filosofia Medieval Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
期刊最新文献
Averroès (Ibn Rushd). L’intellect. Compendium du livre De l’âme. Introduction, traduction, notes et commentaires par J.-B. Brenet. Texte arabe établi et présenté par D. Wirmer. Paris: Vrin, 2022 Gwenaëlle Aubry, Luc Brisson, Philippe Hoffmann, and Laurent Lavaud. Eds. Relire les Éléments de théologie de Proclus. Réceptions, interprétations antiques et modernes. Collection Hermann Philosophie. Paris: Hermann Philosophie, 2021 Anonymus. Extractiones de Talmud per ordinem thematicum. Edited by Ulisse Cecini, Óscar de la Cruz Palma, Alexander Fidora, and Isaac Lampurlanés Farré. Corpus Christianorum Continuatio Mediaevalis 291A. Turnhout: Brepols, 2021 Pilar Herráiz Oliva. Dos tratados averroístas sobre la eternidad del mundo: Siger de Brabante y Boecio de Dacia. Colección Pensamiento Medieval y Renacentista 8. Pamplona: EUNSA, 2022 Christophe Grellard. La possibilità dell’errore. Pensare la tolleranza nel Medioevo. Flumen Sapientiae. Studi sul pensiero medievale 12. Roma: Aracne editrice, 2020
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1