GOVERNMENT-OWNED ENTERPRISES (GOEs) IN INDONESIA’S COMPETITION LAW AND PRACTICE

A. Siswanto, Marihot Janpieter Hutajulu
{"title":"GOVERNMENT-OWNED ENTERPRISES (GOEs) IN INDONESIA’S COMPETITION LAW AND PRACTICE","authors":"A. Siswanto, Marihot Janpieter Hutajulu","doi":"10.20961/YUSTISIA.V0IXX.21740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the competition law discourse, one of the controversial issues is the position of Government-Owned Enterprises (GOEs). There are basically two main views regarding the status of GOEs in the competition law. First, GOEs should be granted privileges, even excluded from the scope of business competition law. Secondly, since GOEs are basically businesses and competitors to private enterprises, GOEs must also be subject to competition law. This paper discusses the status of GOEs in Indonesia’s competition law, both in the context of normative framework and in the implementation of competition law provisions. For this purpose, this paper examine the rules of competition law governing the GOEs and analyze some cases of alleged violations of competition law examined by the KPPU as the Indonesian competition authority. This study found that basically Indonesia’s competition law follows the so-called “competitive neutrality” principle in which the law treat both GOEs and private enterprises in equal manner. However, at the practical domain, the cases studied indicates that monopolistic or dominant position held by GOEs may be abused to favor subsidiaries which are in direct, head to head competition, with private enterprises. ","PeriodicalId":33244,"journal":{"name":"Yustisia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yustisia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20961/YUSTISIA.V0IXX.21740","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the competition law discourse, one of the controversial issues is the position of Government-Owned Enterprises (GOEs). There are basically two main views regarding the status of GOEs in the competition law. First, GOEs should be granted privileges, even excluded from the scope of business competition law. Secondly, since GOEs are basically businesses and competitors to private enterprises, GOEs must also be subject to competition law. This paper discusses the status of GOEs in Indonesia’s competition law, both in the context of normative framework and in the implementation of competition law provisions. For this purpose, this paper examine the rules of competition law governing the GOEs and analyze some cases of alleged violations of competition law examined by the KPPU as the Indonesian competition authority. This study found that basically Indonesia’s competition law follows the so-called “competitive neutrality” principle in which the law treat both GOEs and private enterprises in equal manner. However, at the practical domain, the cases studied indicates that monopolistic or dominant position held by GOEs may be abused to favor subsidiaries which are in direct, head to head competition, with private enterprises. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印尼竞争法律与实践中的国有企业
在竞争法话语中,政府所有制企业的地位是一个有争议的问题。关于国有企业在竞争法中的地位,基本上有两种主要观点。首先,应给予GOE特权,甚至将其排除在商业竞争法的范围之外。其次,由于国有企业基本上是企业和私营企业的竞争对手,因此也必须遵守竞争法。本文从规范框架和竞争法条款的实施两个方面讨论了GOE在印度尼西亚竞争法中的地位。为此,本文审查了管理GOE的竞争法规则,并分析了KPPU作为印度尼西亚竞争主管机构审查的一些涉嫌违反竞争法的案件。这项研究发现,印度尼西亚的竞争法基本上遵循所谓的“竞争中立”原则,即法律平等对待国有企业和私营企业。然而,在实践领域,所研究的案例表明,国有企业拥有的垄断或主导地位可能会被滥用,从而有利于与私营企业进行直接、正面竞争的子公司。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Postponed Regional Head Elections in Emergency Situations: a Constitutional Democracy Perspective in Indonesia Eliminating the Gap of Labor and Social Protection for the Workers of Platform-Based Transportation A Circular Economy-Based Plastic Waste Management Policy in Indonesia (Compared to China and EU) Enhancing Consumer Protection in the Indonesian Financial Service Sector through the Utilization of Standardized Contracts Inadequate Cryptocurrency and Money Laundering Regulations in Indonesia (Comparative Law of US and Germany)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1