One size doesn’t fit all: forms of social technology differentially predict distress

IF 1.9 Q2 COMMUNICATION Communication Research Reports Pub Date : 2022-02-21 DOI:10.1080/08824096.2022.2037542
Laurel R Benjamin, Shu-wen Wang
{"title":"One size doesn’t fit all: forms of social technology differentially predict distress","authors":"Laurel R Benjamin, Shu-wen Wang","doi":"10.1080/08824096.2022.2037542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The current study explored diverse forms of social technology and their corresponding links to distress and well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. A multinational sample of 302 adults in the United States, Mexico, and Japan self-reported on their use of various forms of social technology, psychological distress, and happiness. Results revealed cultural differences in the amount of social technology use (Mexicans highest, Japanese lowest). While total social technology use positively predicted both distress and happiness, specific forms of social technology differentially predicted distress and happiness. Videoconferencing was associated with lower distress and greater happiness, whereas social media was associated with greater distress and lower happiness. Findings also showed that the use of dating apps was a marginally significant negative predictor of both distress and happiness. These findings suggest that forms of social technology that better mirror in-person interaction may confer greater mental health benefits compared to those that are less naturalistic.","PeriodicalId":47084,"journal":{"name":"Communication Research Reports","volume":"39 1","pages":"80 - 92"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication Research Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2022.2037542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The current study explored diverse forms of social technology and their corresponding links to distress and well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. A multinational sample of 302 adults in the United States, Mexico, and Japan self-reported on their use of various forms of social technology, psychological distress, and happiness. Results revealed cultural differences in the amount of social technology use (Mexicans highest, Japanese lowest). While total social technology use positively predicted both distress and happiness, specific forms of social technology differentially predicted distress and happiness. Videoconferencing was associated with lower distress and greater happiness, whereas social media was associated with greater distress and lower happiness. Findings also showed that the use of dating apps was a marginally significant negative predictor of both distress and happiness. These findings suggest that forms of social technology that better mirror in-person interaction may confer greater mental health benefits compared to those that are less naturalistic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种方法并不适用于所有人:不同形式的社交技术对痛苦的预测不同
摘要当前的研究探讨了新冠肺炎大流行期间各种形式的社会技术及其与痛苦和幸福的对应联系。一项针对美国、墨西哥和日本302名成年人的跨国样本,自我报告了他们对各种形式的社交技术的使用、心理困扰和幸福感。结果显示,在社会技术使用量方面存在文化差异(墨西哥人最高,日本人最低)。虽然总体社会技术的使用对痛苦和幸福都有正向预测,但特定形式的社会技术对痛苦和快乐的预测不同。视频会议与较低的痛苦和较高的幸福感相关,而社交媒体与较高的痛苦和较低的幸福感有关。研究结果还表明,约会应用程序的使用对痛苦和幸福都有轻微的负面预测作用。这些发现表明,与那些不那么自然主义的社交技术相比,更好地反映人际互动的社交技术形式可能会带来更大的心理健康益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Extending the communication during sexual activity model: what role does sexual communication self-efficacy play? Conflict styles within individualistic, low power distance, and low context nations: a four nation comparison Science terms elicit ideological differences in message processing Development and validation of the commitment to social activism scale using the Thurstone scaling procedure Patient perceptions of healthcare provider (un)helpful approaches to explaining health information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1