It takes two: potential therapies and insights involving microglia and macrophages in glioblastoma

John Choi, N. Mai, Christopher M. Jackson, Z. Belcaid, M. Lim
{"title":"It takes two: potential therapies and insights involving microglia and macrophages in glioblastoma","authors":"John Choi, N. Mai, Christopher M. Jackson, Z. Belcaid, M. Lim","doi":"10.20517/2347-8659.2018.47","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Microglia and macrophages, two myeloid cell lineages with different origins, make up the majority of immune cells present in glioblastoma (GBM). However, much of the literature does not distinguish between microglia and macrophages, despite a growing body of evidence that demonstrates key structural and functional differences between the cell types. Furthermore, the current M1/M2 paradigm used to sub-classify microglia and macrophages has proven to be incomplete at best, with the growing amount of in vivo and genomic data incompatible with this dichotomy. Finally, a number of studies have already established that in the setting of the GBM tumor microenvironment, both microglia and macrophages are complicit in tumor progression. This review highlights the differences between microglia and macrophages, particularly in the context of GBM, and discusses at length several potential therapeutic strategies made possible by understanding specific pro-tumor and anti-tumor pathways in these myeloid populations. Ultimately, investigating the differences between microglia and macrophages offers insight into the progression of GBM, its marked resistance to current immunotherapy regimens, and future directions for new treatment modalities.","PeriodicalId":19129,"journal":{"name":"Neuroimmunology and Neuroinflammation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroimmunology and Neuroinflammation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20517/2347-8659.2018.47","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Microglia and macrophages, two myeloid cell lineages with different origins, make up the majority of immune cells present in glioblastoma (GBM). However, much of the literature does not distinguish between microglia and macrophages, despite a growing body of evidence that demonstrates key structural and functional differences between the cell types. Furthermore, the current M1/M2 paradigm used to sub-classify microglia and macrophages has proven to be incomplete at best, with the growing amount of in vivo and genomic data incompatible with this dichotomy. Finally, a number of studies have already established that in the setting of the GBM tumor microenvironment, both microglia and macrophages are complicit in tumor progression. This review highlights the differences between microglia and macrophages, particularly in the context of GBM, and discusses at length several potential therapeutic strategies made possible by understanding specific pro-tumor and anti-tumor pathways in these myeloid populations. Ultimately, investigating the differences between microglia and macrophages offers insight into the progression of GBM, its marked resistance to current immunotherapy regimens, and future directions for new treatment modalities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
它需要两个方面:胶质母细胞瘤中涉及小胶质细胞和巨噬细胞的潜在疗法和见解
小胶质细胞和巨噬细胞是两种不同来源的髓系细胞,构成了胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)中存在的大部分免疫细胞。然而,尽管越来越多的证据表明小胶质细胞和巨噬细胞之间存在关键的结构和功能差异,但许多文献并未区分小胶质细胞和巨噬细胞。此外,目前用于对小胶质细胞和巨噬细胞进行亚分类的M1/M2范式已被证明是不完整的,越来越多的体内和基因组数据与这种二分法不相容。最后,大量研究已经证实,在GBM肿瘤微环境下,小胶质细胞和巨噬细胞共同参与肿瘤的进展。这篇综述强调了小胶质细胞和巨噬细胞之间的差异,特别是在GBM的背景下,并详细讨论了几种潜在的治疗策略,通过了解这些髓细胞群体中特定的促肿瘤和抗肿瘤途径。最终,研究小胶质细胞和巨噬细胞之间的差异有助于深入了解GBM的进展,其对当前免疫治疗方案的显著耐药性,以及新治疗方式的未来方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
348
期刊最新文献
Acknowledgment to Reviewers Neurological connections and endogenous biochemistry - potentially useful in electronic-nose diagnostics for coronavirus diseases Use of intravenous immunoglobulin to successfully treat COVID-19 associated encephalitis Viruses and neuroinflammation in multiple sclerosis Pathways linking Alzheimer’s disease risk genes expressed highly in microglia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1