Is There a Grand Convergence in Child Undernutrition Reduction? Evidence from 183 Countries

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q3 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Journal of Human Development and Capabilities Pub Date : 2022-12-05 DOI:10.1080/19452829.2022.2143485
Shalem Balla, Shivani Gharge, Srinivas Goli, Srilakshmi Vedantam
{"title":"Is There a Grand Convergence in Child Undernutrition Reduction? Evidence from 183 Countries","authors":"Shalem Balla, Shivani Gharge, Srinivas Goli, Srilakshmi Vedantam","doi":"10.1080/19452829.2022.2143485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n This study aimed to assess the progress of underweight, stunted, or wasted children across 183 countries from 1990 to 2015 using convergence models. Data for this study has been obtained from the World Bank Database and UNICEF (2020), which provides figures on underweight, stunting, and wasting prevalence for most countries. Data from national-level surveys were compiled for countries where the information was unavailable from the World Bank Database. For our empirical analysis, we have employed parametric convergence metrics like the absolute β-convergence model. In contrast, nonparametric convergence models such as Kernel density plots, were used as robustness checks for our primary analyses. The absolute-convergence model suggests a convergence in the progress of underweight and wasted children between 1990 and 2015, whereas we find a divergence in progress towards the decline in stunted children between 1990–95 to 2010–15. However, the nonparametric convergence test suggests that except for wasting, the other two indicators of child nutrition show an emergence of multiple convergence clubs instead of a grand global convergence. At the same time, the regional heterogeneity test for the absolute convergence model suggests that our main findings still hold except for stunting in upper-middle-income countries, which supports the convergence hypothesis.","PeriodicalId":46538,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Development and Capabilities","volume":"24 1","pages":"24 - 48"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Development and Capabilities","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2022.2143485","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study aimed to assess the progress of underweight, stunted, or wasted children across 183 countries from 1990 to 2015 using convergence models. Data for this study has been obtained from the World Bank Database and UNICEF (2020), which provides figures on underweight, stunting, and wasting prevalence for most countries. Data from national-level surveys were compiled for countries where the information was unavailable from the World Bank Database. For our empirical analysis, we have employed parametric convergence metrics like the absolute β-convergence model. In contrast, nonparametric convergence models such as Kernel density plots, were used as robustness checks for our primary analyses. The absolute-convergence model suggests a convergence in the progress of underweight and wasted children between 1990 and 2015, whereas we find a divergence in progress towards the decline in stunted children between 1990–95 to 2010–15. However, the nonparametric convergence test suggests that except for wasting, the other two indicators of child nutrition show an emergence of multiple convergence clubs instead of a grand global convergence. At the same time, the regional heterogeneity test for the absolute convergence model suggests that our main findings still hold except for stunting in upper-middle-income countries, which supports the convergence hypothesis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在减少儿童营养不足方面是否有大的趋同?来自183个国家的证据
本研究旨在利用收敛模型评估从1990年到2015年183个国家中体重不足、发育迟缓或消瘦儿童的进展。本研究的数据来自世界银行数据库和联合国儿童基金会(2020年),该数据库提供了大多数国家体重不足、发育迟缓和消瘦发生率的数据。来自国家一级调查的数据是为无法从世界银行数据库获得信息的国家汇编的。对于我们的实证分析,我们采用了参数收敛指标,如绝对β-收敛模型。相比之下,非参数收敛模型(如核密度图)被用作我们主要分析的鲁棒性检查。绝对收敛模型表明,1990年至2015年期间,体重不足和消瘦儿童的进展趋同,而我们发现,1990 - 1995年至2010 - 2015年期间,发育迟缓儿童的下降进展存在分歧。然而,非参数收敛检验表明,除了消瘦,儿童营养的其他两个指标呈现出多个收敛俱乐部的出现,而不是一个大的全球收敛。同时,对绝对收敛模型的区域异质性检验表明,除了中高收入国家的发育迟缓外,我们的主要发现仍然成立,这支持了收敛假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Journal of Human Development and Capabilities: A Multi-Disciplinary Journal for People-Centered Development is the peer-reviewed journal of the Human Development and Capabilities Association. It was launched in January 2000 to promote new perspectives on challenges of human development, capability expansion, poverty eradication, social justice and human rights. The Journal aims to stimulate innovative development thinking that is based on the premise that development is fundamentally about improving the well-being and agency of people, by expanding the choices and opportunities they have. Accordingly, the Journal recognizes that development is about more than just economic growth and development policy is more than just economic policy: it cuts across economic, social, political and environmental issues. The Journal publishes original work in philosophy, economics, and other social sciences that expand concepts, measurement tools and policy alternatives for human development. It provides a forum for an open exchange of ideas among a broad spectrum of academics, policy makers and development practitioners who are interested in confronting the challenges of human development at global, national and local levels.
期刊最新文献
The Capabilities Divide: ICT Adoption and Use among Bedouin in Israel How is the Capability Approach Applied to Assess Well-being Impacts? A Systematic Review The right to higher education: a political theory Implementing Inequality: The Invisible Labour of International Development Message from the Editor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1