求助PDF
{"title":"Comparison between unfractionated heparin (UFH) and fondaparinux on platelets and D-dimer level in COVID-19 patients with hypercoagulation","authors":"Meity Ardiana, H. Hermawan, P. M. Harsoyo, I. Sufiyah, M. Fanani","doi":"10.5603/aa.2022.0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: This study aimed to compare the clinical effects between UFH and fondaparinux in COVID-19 patients with hypercoagulation. Material(s) and Method(s): This was a prospective cohort study. Samples were taken consecutively from hospitalized COVID-19 patients with hypercoagulation who received UFH or fondaparinux based on the standardized guidelines. A total of 71 patients met the inclusion criteria. Patients were evaluated for platelet and D-dimer values before and after administration of UFH or fondaparinux. Result(s): Although there was no difference in D-dimer reduction between the two groups (p = 0.44), fondaparinux showed a greater reduction, 26% against 22% for UFH. While on platelets, there was a significant difference (p = 0.04) between fondaparinux and UFH. Fondaparinux showed a reduced thrombocytopenia impact, as seen by an increase in pre-and post-therapy platelets of up to 50%, compared to 16% in UFH. In regard to the incidence of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT), there was no significant difference between post-UFH therapy and post-fondaparinux therapy (p = 0.361). Conclusion(s): Fondaparinux did not reduce platelet levels as much as UFH, but there was no difference between the fondaparinux group compared to the UFH group in the effect of decreasing D-dimer levels and the sign of HIT. Copyright © 2022 Via Medica.","PeriodicalId":41754,"journal":{"name":"Acta Angiologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Angiologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/aa.2022.0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
引用
批量引用
普通肝素(UFH)和磺达肝素对新冠肺炎高凝患者血小板和D-二聚体水平的比较
前言:本研究旨在比较UFH与fondaparinux治疗COVID-19高凝患者的临床效果。材料和方法:这是一项前瞻性队列研究。根据标准化指南连续采集住院的COVID-19高凝患者接受UFH或fondaparinux的样本。共有71例患者符合纳入标准。在给予UFH或fondaparinux前后评估患者的血小板和d -二聚体值。结果:虽然两组之间d -二聚体的减少没有差异(p = 0.44),但fondaparinux显示出更大的减少,26%对22% UFH。而在血小板方面,fondaparinux和UFH之间有显著差异(p = 0.04)。Fondaparinux显示减少血小板减少的影响,治疗前和治疗后血小板增加高达50%,而UFH为16%。在肝素诱导的血小板减少症(HIT)发生率方面,ufh治疗后与fondaparinux治疗后无显著差异(p = 0.361)。结论:Fondaparinux降低血小板水平的效果不如UFH,但在降低d -二聚体水平和HIT体征方面,Fondaparinux组与UFH组比较无差异。版权所有©2022 Via Medica
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。