Dualna natura programów komputerowych

I. Bondecka-Krzykowska
{"title":"Dualna natura programów komputerowych","authors":"I. Bondecka-Krzykowska","doi":"10.15633/ss.2483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper is devoted to the discussion on ontological status of the computer programs. The most popular conceptions are presented and critically discussed: programs as concrete abstractions, as quasi-particular objects (similar to mu sical pieces), as mathematical objects (of different kinds), and finally – pro gram as digital pattern. Advantages and disadvantages of those approaches are pointed out and some possible solutions are proposed.","PeriodicalId":30875,"journal":{"name":"Semina Scientiarum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Semina Scientiarum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15633/ss.2483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper is devoted to the discussion on ontological status of the computer programs. The most popular conceptions are presented and critically discussed: programs as concrete abstractions, as quasi-particular objects (similar to mu sical pieces), as mathematical objects (of different kinds), and finally – pro gram as digital pattern. Advantages and disadvantages of those approaches are pointed out and some possible solutions are proposed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
计算机程序的双重性
本文对计算机程序的本体论地位进行了探讨。最流行的概念被提出并批判性地讨论:作为具体抽象的程序,作为准特定对象(类似于音乐片段),作为数学对象(不同种类),最后-程序作为数字模式。指出了这些方法的优缺点,并提出了一些可能的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Paradygmat obiektowy w oprogramowaniu astronomicznym Człowiek jako wytwór siebie samego. Lem, transhumanizm i dwie koncepcje autentyczności Oświeceniowa wizja nauki w ujęciu Józefa Sołtykowicza, jako przykład refleksji filozoficznej z kręgu Towarzystwa Naukowego Krakowskiego Krytyka Platona przyjmowania uczestniczenia (ei;dh) rzeczy w postaciach () jako przyczynek do dyskusji na temat źródeł antynomii w podstawach matematyki Wyjątkowy status człowieka w przyrodzie? Nauki ewolucyjne a chrześcijańska antropologia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1