Effects of Frozen Materials Other Than Grapes on Red Wine Aroma Compounds. Impacts of Harvest Technologies

IF 2.2 3区 农林科学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY American Journal of Enology and Viticulture Pub Date : 2022-03-30 DOI:10.5344/ajev.2022.22006
Yibin Lan, Jiaming Wang, Emily Aubie, Marnie Crombleholme, A. Reynolds
{"title":"Effects of Frozen Materials Other Than Grapes on Red Wine Aroma Compounds. Impacts of Harvest Technologies","authors":"Yibin Lan, Jiaming Wang, Emily Aubie, Marnie Crombleholme, A. Reynolds","doi":"10.5344/ajev.2022.22006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An undesirable sensory attribute (“floral taint”) has been detected in red wines in North America, caused by leaves and petioles (materials other than grapes [MOG]) introduced during mechanical harvest after killing frosts. From 2017 to 2019, several harvest strategies were evaluated on Ontario Cabernet franc: hand harvest (HH), conventional machine harvesting (MECH), Braud-New Holland Opti (OPTI), Gregoire GL8, MECH + optical sorting (MECH+OS), and MECH with preharvest leaf removal (MECH+BLR). Concentrations of 41 odor-active compounds were quantified by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Harvest treatment effects varied by season. In 2017, HH resulted in lowest ethyl isobutyrate (MECH+BLR), ethyl nonoate, cis-linalool oxide (plus MECH and OPTI), trans-linalool oxide (plus MECH+OS), β-citral, and cis- and trans-rose oxide (plus MECH and OPTI). Ethyl hexanoate was lowest in MECH, and MECH+BLR, isoamyl hexanoate was lowest in all treatments except HH, and α-ionone was lowest in MECH and MECH+BLR. In 2018, HH resulted in the lowest β-damascenone, ethyl salicylate (plus OPTI and Gregoire), citronellol (plus Gregoire), cis- and trans-rose oxide (plus Gregoire), and eugenol (plus Gregoire). Isobutyl acetate, isoamyl hexanoate, and nerol were additionally reduced by Gregoire, and isopropylmethoxypyrazine was reduced by all treatments except HH. In 2019, harvest strategy affected 27 of 41 compounds, including 11 esters and 12 terpenes. Treatments leading to lowest concentrations were HH (nine compounds), MECH (eight compounds), MECH+BLR (10 compounds), OPTI (21 compounds), Gregoire (10 compounds), and MECH+OS (22 compounds). Wines from fruit that had undergone a killing frost contained different concentrations of 14 and eight compounds (2018), and 17 and 13 compounds (2019) for Cabernet franc and Cabernet Sauvignon, respectively. Results suggest that specific harvest technologies can reduce MOG and associated increases in aroma compounds, although seasonal differences may occur.","PeriodicalId":7461,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Enology and Viticulture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Enology and Viticulture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.2022.22006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

An undesirable sensory attribute (“floral taint”) has been detected in red wines in North America, caused by leaves and petioles (materials other than grapes [MOG]) introduced during mechanical harvest after killing frosts. From 2017 to 2019, several harvest strategies were evaluated on Ontario Cabernet franc: hand harvest (HH), conventional machine harvesting (MECH), Braud-New Holland Opti (OPTI), Gregoire GL8, MECH + optical sorting (MECH+OS), and MECH with preharvest leaf removal (MECH+BLR). Concentrations of 41 odor-active compounds were quantified by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Harvest treatment effects varied by season. In 2017, HH resulted in lowest ethyl isobutyrate (MECH+BLR), ethyl nonoate, cis-linalool oxide (plus MECH and OPTI), trans-linalool oxide (plus MECH+OS), β-citral, and cis- and trans-rose oxide (plus MECH and OPTI). Ethyl hexanoate was lowest in MECH, and MECH+BLR, isoamyl hexanoate was lowest in all treatments except HH, and α-ionone was lowest in MECH and MECH+BLR. In 2018, HH resulted in the lowest β-damascenone, ethyl salicylate (plus OPTI and Gregoire), citronellol (plus Gregoire), cis- and trans-rose oxide (plus Gregoire), and eugenol (plus Gregoire). Isobutyl acetate, isoamyl hexanoate, and nerol were additionally reduced by Gregoire, and isopropylmethoxypyrazine was reduced by all treatments except HH. In 2019, harvest strategy affected 27 of 41 compounds, including 11 esters and 12 terpenes. Treatments leading to lowest concentrations were HH (nine compounds), MECH (eight compounds), MECH+BLR (10 compounds), OPTI (21 compounds), Gregoire (10 compounds), and MECH+OS (22 compounds). Wines from fruit that had undergone a killing frost contained different concentrations of 14 and eight compounds (2018), and 17 and 13 compounds (2019) for Cabernet franc and Cabernet Sauvignon, respectively. Results suggest that specific harvest technologies can reduce MOG and associated increases in aroma compounds, although seasonal differences may occur.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
葡萄以外的冷冻物质对红酒香气成分的影响。收获技术的影响
在北美的红葡萄酒中发现了一种不受欢迎的感官属性(“花香”),这是由在除霜后的机械收获过程中引入的叶子和叶柄(葡萄以外的材料[MOG])引起的。从2017年到2019年,对安大略省品丽珠的几种采收策略进行了评估:手工采收(HH)、传统机器采收(MECH)、博朗-新荷兰Opti (Opti)、Gregoire GL8、MECH+光学分拣(MECH+OS)和MECH+采收前叶片去除(MECH+BLR)。采用气相色谱-质谱联用技术对41种气味活性化合物的浓度进行了定量分析。收获处理的效果因季节而异。2017年,HH导致最低的异丁酸乙酯(MECH+BLR)、壬酸乙酯、顺式芳樟醇氧化物(加MECH和OPTI)、反式芳樟醇氧化物(加MECH+OS)、β-柠檬醛、顺式和反式玫瑰氧化物(加MECH和OPTI)。除HH外,所有处理中MECH、MECH+BLR中己酸乙酯含量最低,MECH+BLR中己酸异戊酯含量最低,α-离子酮含量最低。2018年,HH导致β-大马士革酮、水杨酸乙酯(加上OPTI和Gregoire)、香茅醇(加上Gregoire)、顺式和反式玫瑰氧化物(加上Gregoire)和丁香酚(加上Gregoire)的含量最低。Gregoire还能还原乙酸异丁酯、己酸异戊酯和橙醇,除HH外,其他处理均能还原异丙基甲氧基吡嗪。2019年,收获策略影响了41种化合物中的27种,包括11种酯类和12种萜类。浓度最低的处理为HH(9种)、MECH(8种)、MECH+BLR(10种)、OPTI(21种)、Gregoire(10种)和MECH+OS(22种)。经过杀霜处理的水果制成的葡萄酒中,品丽珠和赤霞珠分别含有14种和8种化合物(2018年)和17种和13种化合物(2019年)的不同浓度。结果表明,特定的收获技术可以减少MOG和相关的香气化合物的增加,尽管可能会出现季节性差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 农林科学-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
27
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Enology and Viticulture (AJEV), published quarterly, is an official journal of the American Society for Enology and Viticulture (ASEV) and is the premier journal in the English language dedicated to scientific research on winemaking and grapegrowing. AJEV publishes full-length research papers, literature reviews, research notes, and technical briefs on various aspects of enology and viticulture, including wine chemistry, sensory science, process engineering, wine quality assessments, microbiology, methods development, plant pathogenesis, diseases and pests of grape, rootstock and clonal evaluation, effect of field practices, and grape genetics and breeding. All papers are peer reviewed, and authorship of papers is not limited to members of ASEV. The science editor, along with the viticulture, enology, and associate editors, are drawn from academic and research institutions worldwide and guide the content of the Journal.
期刊最新文献
Red Wine Fermentation Alters Grape Seed Morphology and Internal Porosity Phenological Stage and Tissue Type of Grapevines Impact Concentrations and Variability of Mineral Nutrients Machine-Learning Methods for the Identification of Key Predictors of Site-Specific Vineyard Yield and Vine Size Gibberellic Acid for Table Grape Inflorescence Elongation: Is It Worth It? Consumer Hedonic Testing and Chemical Analysis of Iowa Wines Made from Five Cold-Hardy Interspecific Grape Varieties (Vitisspp.)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1