Efficacy of endovenous laser ablation (endovenous laser ablation) versus conventional stripping in the treatment of great saphenous vein reflux

IF 0.1 Q4 SURGERY Egyptian Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2017-07-01 DOI:10.4103/ejs.ejs_7_17
El-Sayed Abd El-Mabood, R. Salama
{"title":"Efficacy of endovenous laser ablation (endovenous laser ablation) versus conventional stripping in the treatment of great saphenous vein reflux","authors":"El-Sayed Abd El-Mabood, R. Salama","doi":"10.4103/ejs.ejs_7_17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose The purpose of this study was to find out the advantages and efficacy of endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) versus conventional stripping in the treatment of great saphenous vein (GSV) reflux. Background Varicose vein treatment places a considerable strain on the medical system, with long waiting time for operation in the public hospital system. EVLA allows efficient treatment of many patients on an outpatient basis. Patients and methods This prospective study included 44 patients with primary varicose veins. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups according to the intervention performed − group A: conventional surgical stripping of the GSV [22 (50%)], and group B: EVLA ablation [22 (50%)]. All patients underwent clinical evaluation, routine hematological tests, and venous duplex of both lower limbs. The follow-up period was 6 months. Results There were satisfactory results in the EVLA group (group B); in about 20 (90.8%) cases of this group the procedure was performed under tumescent anesthesia with less mean postoperative time, 69.1±3 min, less postoperative pain rate, 4.05±1.23, less 1-week complications limited to Bruising and Ecchymosis in five (23.8%) cases, superficial phlebitis in three (14.28%) cases, developed thrombosis in two (9.52%) cases, or skin burn in one (4.76%) case. Rapid return to normal activity (5.8±1.5) and overall results were better in group B, 19 (90.47%), compared with group B, 14 (66.66%), with a P-value of 0.001. Conclusion EVLA of GSV, being simple to perform and well accepted by patients, is a safe and effective method with low rate of complications, one-day hospitalization, short recovery time, and quick return to professional activities. For these reasons, this method is considered a very promising technique especially in female patients for cosmetic reasons as compared with surgical stripping.","PeriodicalId":43393,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Surgery","volume":"36 1","pages":"222 - 232"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ejs.ejs_7_17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study was to find out the advantages and efficacy of endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) versus conventional stripping in the treatment of great saphenous vein (GSV) reflux. Background Varicose vein treatment places a considerable strain on the medical system, with long waiting time for operation in the public hospital system. EVLA allows efficient treatment of many patients on an outpatient basis. Patients and methods This prospective study included 44 patients with primary varicose veins. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups according to the intervention performed − group A: conventional surgical stripping of the GSV [22 (50%)], and group B: EVLA ablation [22 (50%)]. All patients underwent clinical evaluation, routine hematological tests, and venous duplex of both lower limbs. The follow-up period was 6 months. Results There were satisfactory results in the EVLA group (group B); in about 20 (90.8%) cases of this group the procedure was performed under tumescent anesthesia with less mean postoperative time, 69.1±3 min, less postoperative pain rate, 4.05±1.23, less 1-week complications limited to Bruising and Ecchymosis in five (23.8%) cases, superficial phlebitis in three (14.28%) cases, developed thrombosis in two (9.52%) cases, or skin burn in one (4.76%) case. Rapid return to normal activity (5.8±1.5) and overall results were better in group B, 19 (90.47%), compared with group B, 14 (66.66%), with a P-value of 0.001. Conclusion EVLA of GSV, being simple to perform and well accepted by patients, is a safe and effective method with low rate of complications, one-day hospitalization, short recovery time, and quick return to professional activities. For these reasons, this method is considered a very promising technique especially in female patients for cosmetic reasons as compared with surgical stripping.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腔内激光消融术与传统剥离术治疗大隐静脉反流的疗效比较
目的本研究的目的是找出静脉内激光消融(EVLA)与传统剥离术治疗大隐静脉(GSV)反流的优势和疗效。背景静脉曲张治疗给医疗系统带来了相当大的压力,在公立医院系统中等待手术的时间很长。EVLA允许在门诊基础上对许多患者进行有效治疗。患者和方法本前瞻性研究包括44例原发性静脉曲张患者。根据所进行的干预,患者被随机分为两组——A组:常规手术剥离GSV[22(50%)],B组:EVLA消融[22(50%]。所有患者均接受了临床评估、常规血液学检查和双下肢静脉双功能检查。随访6个月。结果EVLA组(B组)疗效满意;本组约20例(90.8%)在肿胀麻醉下进行手术,平均术后时间为69.1±3 min,术后疼痛率较低,为4.05±1.23,5例(23.8%)出现1周并发症,3例(14.28%)出现浅静脉炎,2例(9.52%)出现血栓,1例(4.76%)出现皮肤烧伤。与B组14(66.66%)相比,B组19(90.47%)快速恢复正常活动(5.8±1.5),总体结果更好,P值为0.001。结论GSV EVLA操作简单,患者接受良好,并发症发生率低,住院一天,恢复时间短,恢复快,是一种安全有效的方法。由于这些原因,与手术剥离相比,这种方法被认为是一种非常有前途的技术,尤其是在女性患者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The use of bipolar pure cut mode technology in dissection of parotid tumors: A novel technique Outcomes of thermal ablation combined with u/s guided foam sclerotherapy in treatment of superficial venous reflux in patients with postphlebitic venous leg ulcer The effect of immediate postoperative increase in blood flow velocity in predicting maturation of arteriovenous fistula for dialysis Comparative study between anterior and posterior approach in emergent femoral hernia Prediction of common bile duct stones in acute cholecystitis patients at time of hospital admission
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1