Enhancing Parental Coping with a Child’s Heart Condition: A Co-production Pilot Study

A. Jackson, E. Frydenberg, Xui Min Koey, A. Fernández, Rosemary O Higgins, Tracy Stanley, R. Liang, Michael R. Le Grande, B. Murphy
{"title":"Enhancing Parental Coping with a Child’s Heart Condition: A Co-production Pilot Study","authors":"A. Jackson, E. Frydenberg, Xui Min Koey, A. Fernández, Rosemary O Higgins, Tracy Stanley, R. Liang, Michael R. Le Grande, B. Murphy","doi":"10.1080/24694193.2019.1671915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Families of children with congenital heart disease (CHD) can have difficulties coping with the stress of their child’s condition and would benefit from assistance to cope better. To address the needs of these parents, the Australian Center for Heart Health/HeartKids Australia/Melbourne Graduate School of Education co-produced Family Coping Project was initiated. This project involved two systematic literature reviews, interviews with parents of children with CHD, and the development and piloting of a manualised parental coping program. The primary aims of the pilot study were to determine whether the program would: attract high needs families; enhance the coping self-efficacy of parents; and be acceptable to parents in terms of content and mode of delivery. The secondary aims were to investigate whether the program would impact on parental coping, parental stress and general stress. Parents completed pre-, post-program and 6-month follow up assessment measures, with parent stress scores being compared to stress scores reported for other chronic condition parent carer groups. Twenty-one parents participated and provided baseline data. They were found to be significantly more stressed than other parent carer groups. Eleven parents completed post-program data and 13 completed 6-month follow-up data. There was a significant increase in parents’ coping self-efficacy from pre- to post-program, and from pre- to 6-months. Parents’ use of productive coping styles increased significantly from pre- to post-program. The program was rated as highly acceptable in terms of content and delivery mode. The pilot provides strong evidence for upscaling the program in conjunction with individualized psychological support for parents to extend knowledge acquisition and attitude change into enhanced coping skills and demonstrated the benefits of a co-production process.","PeriodicalId":45903,"journal":{"name":"Comprehensive Child and Adolescent Nursing-Building Evidence for Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/24694193.2019.1671915","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comprehensive Child and Adolescent Nursing-Building Evidence for Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24694193.2019.1671915","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT Families of children with congenital heart disease (CHD) can have difficulties coping with the stress of their child’s condition and would benefit from assistance to cope better. To address the needs of these parents, the Australian Center for Heart Health/HeartKids Australia/Melbourne Graduate School of Education co-produced Family Coping Project was initiated. This project involved two systematic literature reviews, interviews with parents of children with CHD, and the development and piloting of a manualised parental coping program. The primary aims of the pilot study were to determine whether the program would: attract high needs families; enhance the coping self-efficacy of parents; and be acceptable to parents in terms of content and mode of delivery. The secondary aims were to investigate whether the program would impact on parental coping, parental stress and general stress. Parents completed pre-, post-program and 6-month follow up assessment measures, with parent stress scores being compared to stress scores reported for other chronic condition parent carer groups. Twenty-one parents participated and provided baseline data. They were found to be significantly more stressed than other parent carer groups. Eleven parents completed post-program data and 13 completed 6-month follow-up data. There was a significant increase in parents’ coping self-efficacy from pre- to post-program, and from pre- to 6-months. Parents’ use of productive coping styles increased significantly from pre- to post-program. The program was rated as highly acceptable in terms of content and delivery mode. The pilot provides strong evidence for upscaling the program in conjunction with individualized psychological support for parents to extend knowledge acquisition and attitude change into enhanced coping skills and demonstrated the benefits of a co-production process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加强父母对儿童心脏病的应对:一项联合制作的试点研究
患有先天性心脏病(CHD)的儿童的家庭可能难以应对孩子的状况带来的压力,并将从帮助中受益,以更好地应对。为了满足这些家长的需求,澳大利亚心脏健康中心/澳大利亚心脏儿童协会/墨尔本教育研究生院共同发起了家庭应对项目。该项目涉及两项系统的文献综述,对CHD儿童父母的采访,以及手动父母应对计划的开发和试点。试点研究的主要目的是确定该计划是否会:吸引高需求家庭;增强父母的应对自我效能感;并在内容和交付方式方面为家长所接受。次要目的是调查该计划是否会影响父母的应对、父母压力和一般压力。家长完成了项目前、项目后和6个月的随访评估措施,将家长压力评分与其他慢性病家长护理组报告的压力评分进行比较。21名家长参与并提供了基线数据。他们被发现比其他父母照顾者群体压力更大。11名家长完成了项目后数据,13名家长完成6个月的随访数据。从项目前到项目后,以及从项目前至6个月,父母的应对自我效能感显著提高。从项目前到项目后,家长对有效应对方式的使用显著增加。该节目在内容和交付模式方面被评为高度可接受。该试点项目为扩大该项目的规模提供了强有力的证据,同时为家长提供了个性化的心理支持,将知识获取和态度转变扩展到增强应对技能,并展示了合作制作过程的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
The Covid-19 Pandemic’s Forgotten Children A Compass for Nursing Specialty Professional Development Development of a Foundation Protocol for Feeding Complex Care Neonates and Enablers and Barriers to Its Implementation Can a Measles Epidemic Be Avoided in 2022? Why Should the Welfare of Therapy Animals Involved in Animal Assisted Interventions Matter to Child Healthcare Researchers and Professionals?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1