Are Conservatives Less Likely Than Liberals to Accept Welfare? The Psychology of Welfare Politics

IF 2.1 Q3 BUSINESS Journal of the Association for Consumer Research Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1086/719586
Shreyans Goenka, Manoj. T. Thomas
{"title":"Are Conservatives Less Likely Than Liberals to Accept Welfare? The Psychology of Welfare Politics","authors":"Shreyans Goenka, Manoj. T. Thomas","doi":"10.1086/719586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research has shown that conservatives tend to oppose the distribution of welfare to other people. However, are conservatives less likely than liberals to accept welfare for themselves? We find that the difference in liberals’ and conservatives’ welfare enrollment depends on whether the welfare program has a work requirement policy. A natural field experiment shows that when the supplemental nutritional program (SNAP) had a work requirement, liberals and conservatives were equally likely to enroll in this program. In the absence of a work requirement, conservatives were less likely than liberals to enroll in it. Follow-up experiments replicate this result and demonstrate the underlying mechanism: conservatives’ adherence to binding moral values (loyalty, authority, and purity; Graham, Haidt, and Nosek 2009) makes them hesitant to accept welfare without a work requirement. Policy makers can deploy marketing messages to mitigate this effect and boost conservatives’ enrollment in such welfare programs.","PeriodicalId":36388,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Association for Consumer Research","volume":"7 1","pages":"305 - 315"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Association for Consumer Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/719586","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Research has shown that conservatives tend to oppose the distribution of welfare to other people. However, are conservatives less likely than liberals to accept welfare for themselves? We find that the difference in liberals’ and conservatives’ welfare enrollment depends on whether the welfare program has a work requirement policy. A natural field experiment shows that when the supplemental nutritional program (SNAP) had a work requirement, liberals and conservatives were equally likely to enroll in this program. In the absence of a work requirement, conservatives were less likely than liberals to enroll in it. Follow-up experiments replicate this result and demonstrate the underlying mechanism: conservatives’ adherence to binding moral values (loyalty, authority, and purity; Graham, Haidt, and Nosek 2009) makes them hesitant to accept welfare without a work requirement. Policy makers can deploy marketing messages to mitigate this effect and boost conservatives’ enrollment in such welfare programs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
保守派比自由派更不可能接受福利吗?福利政治心理学
研究表明,保守派倾向于反对将福利分配给其他人。然而,保守派是否比自由派更不可能接受福利?我们发现,自由派和保守派福利入学人数的差异取决于福利项目是否有工作要求政策。一项自然实地实验表明,当补充营养计划(SNAP)有工作要求时,自由派和保守派同样有可能参加该计划。在没有工作要求的情况下,保守派比自由派更不可能参与其中。后续实验复制了这一结果,并证明了潜在的机制:保守派对约束性道德价值观(忠诚、权威和纯洁;Graham、Haidt和Nosek,2009年)的坚持使他们对接受没有工作需求的福利犹豫不决。政策制定者可以利用营销信息来缓解这种影响,并提高保守派在此类福利项目中的参与率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Association for Consumer Research
Journal of the Association for Consumer Research Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
54
期刊最新文献
Priming Young Minds – The Appeal of Gambling Advertising to Children and Young People. Mathematics is Good for the Mind and Body: Children Make Better Food Choices After Solving Math Problems Understanding the Past and Preparing for Tomorrow: Children and Adolescent Consumer Behavior Insights from Research in Our Field EDUCATING FOR ADOLESCENT WELL-BEING: IS IT TIME FOR MARKETPLACE LITERACY? The Effects of Social Media Consumption on Adolescent Psychological Well-Being
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1