Dignity, Exceptionality, Trust. EU, Me, Us

IF 0.5 Q3 LAW European Public Law Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI:10.54648/euro2020051
Davor Petrić
{"title":"Dignity, Exceptionality, Trust. EU, Me, Us","authors":"Davor Petrić","doi":"10.54648/euro2020051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The German Federal Constitutional Court (GFCC) in late 2015 delivered a decision on the European Arrest Warrant (EAW). With it, the GFCC further elaborated its trademark doctrine on the constitutional-identity review of EU law’s application in Germany, introducing human dignity as another yardstick. In this article, I critically reassess the merits and implications of this doctrinal development, in particular for the relationship between the GFCC and the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and for the EU law-national law dynamic in general.\nHuman dignity; German Federal Constitutional Court; European Arrest Warrant; constitutional-identity review; Court of Justice","PeriodicalId":43955,"journal":{"name":"European Public Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Public Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/euro2020051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The German Federal Constitutional Court (GFCC) in late 2015 delivered a decision on the European Arrest Warrant (EAW). With it, the GFCC further elaborated its trademark doctrine on the constitutional-identity review of EU law’s application in Germany, introducing human dignity as another yardstick. In this article, I critically reassess the merits and implications of this doctrinal development, in particular for the relationship between the GFCC and the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and for the EU law-national law dynamic in general. Human dignity; German Federal Constitutional Court; European Arrest Warrant; constitutional-identity review; Court of Justice
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尊严,卓越,信任。EU, Me, Us
2015年底,德国联邦宪法法院(GFCC)就欧洲逮捕令(EAW)做出了裁决。在此基础上,GFCC进一步阐述了其商标主义对欧盟法律在德国适用的宪法认同审查,引入了人的尊严作为另一个衡量标准。在本文中,我批判性地重新评估了这一理论发展的优点和影响,特别是对于GFCC和欧盟法院(CJEU)之间的关系以及欧盟法律-国家法律动态。人的尊严;德国联邦宪法法院;欧洲逮捕令;constitutional-identity审查;法院
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
‘Respect for Religious Feelings’: As the Italian Case Shows, Fresh Paint Can’t Fix the Crumbling Wall of Blasphemy The ‘Then’ and the ‘Now’ of Forced Relocation of Indigenous Peoples: Repercussions in International Law, Torts and Beyond Subsidiarity v. Autonomy in the EU Book Review: Federalism and Constitutional Law: The Italian Contribution to Comparative Regionalism, Erika Arban, Giuseppe Martinico & Francesco Palermo (eds). London and New York: Routledge. 2021 The Tragic Choices During the Global Health Emergency: Comparative Economic Law Reflections
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1