Impact of sex on severity assessment and cardiac remodeling in primary mitral regurgitation due to valve prolapse

A. Altes , F. Levy , V. Hanet , D. De Azevedo , P. Krug , L. Iacuzio , M. Toledano , V. Silvestri , D. Vancraeynest , A. Pasquet , A. Vincentelli , A. Eker , S. Marechaux , B. Gerber
{"title":"Impact of sex on severity assessment and cardiac remodeling in primary mitral regurgitation due to valve prolapse","authors":"A. Altes ,&nbsp;F. Levy ,&nbsp;V. Hanet ,&nbsp;D. De Azevedo ,&nbsp;P. Krug ,&nbsp;L. Iacuzio ,&nbsp;M. Toledano ,&nbsp;V. Silvestri ,&nbsp;D. Vancraeynest ,&nbsp;A. Pasquet ,&nbsp;A. Vincentelli ,&nbsp;A. Eker ,&nbsp;S. Marechaux ,&nbsp;B. Gerber","doi":"10.1016/j.acvdsp.2023.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The current recommended cut-off values for primary mitral regurgitation (MR) quantification (Effective Regurgitant Orifice Area [EROA], regurgitant volume [RegVol]) and left ventricular (LV) remodeling in MR (end-systolic diameter [ESD]) are not sex-specific.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>We retrospectively evaluated 470 patients (27% women, median age 63 years) with chronic significant primary MR due to prolapse who underwent echocardiography<span> (Echo) and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in 3 tertiary centers between 2005 and 2022.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>Women were older than men, had higher NYHA class, larger left atrial volume, higher pulmonary pressure, and more symptoms-triggered MV intervention (all </span><em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.035). However, both MR EROA, Echo-RegVol and CMR-RegVol were lower in women than in men (all <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <span>0.003), while CMR regurgitant fraction (RegFrac) values were similar (</span><em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.890). Abnormally increased CMR- (&gt; upper limit bound of UK Biobank reference values) indexed LV end-diastolic (indLVEDV), end-systolic volume (indLVESV) were observed in 55%, 29% of patients, respectively, without sex difference (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.9). The optimal cut-off values of MR EROA, Echo-RegVol and CMR-RegVol associated with enlarged indLVEDV were lower in women (40 mm<sup>2</sup>, 60<!--> <!-->mL, 50<!--> <!-->mL) than in men (45 mm<sup>2</sup>,77<!--> <!-->mL, 62<!--> <!-->mL). LVESD ≥ 40<!--> <!-->mm showed in women and men high specificity [Sp] (91%, 79%) but poor sensitivity [Se] (40% 50%) to predict enlarged indLVESV, while the optimal threshold was slightly lower in women (35<!--> <!-->mm, Se<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->65%, Sp<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->71%) than in men (37<!--> <!-->mm, Se<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->65%, Sp<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->68%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Despite clear hallmarks of more advanced valve disease, women with primary MR have lower mitral RegVol and lower ventricular volumes than men. Then, cut-off values of mitral RegVol, EROA and LV dimensions for predicting abnormal LV dilatation are lower in women than in men. Hence, guideline-based criteria for grading MR and timing of intervention could be sex-specific (<span>Fig. 1</span>).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8140,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases Supplements","volume":"15 3","pages":"Page 243"},"PeriodicalIF":18.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases Supplements","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878648023001416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The current recommended cut-off values for primary mitral regurgitation (MR) quantification (Effective Regurgitant Orifice Area [EROA], regurgitant volume [RegVol]) and left ventricular (LV) remodeling in MR (end-systolic diameter [ESD]) are not sex-specific.

Method

We retrospectively evaluated 470 patients (27% women, median age 63 years) with chronic significant primary MR due to prolapse who underwent echocardiography (Echo) and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in 3 tertiary centers between 2005 and 2022.

Results

Women were older than men, had higher NYHA class, larger left atrial volume, higher pulmonary pressure, and more symptoms-triggered MV intervention (all P < 0.035). However, both MR EROA, Echo-RegVol and CMR-RegVol were lower in women than in men (all P < 0.003), while CMR regurgitant fraction (RegFrac) values were similar (P = 0.890). Abnormally increased CMR- (> upper limit bound of UK Biobank reference values) indexed LV end-diastolic (indLVEDV), end-systolic volume (indLVESV) were observed in 55%, 29% of patients, respectively, without sex difference (P = 1, P = 0.9). The optimal cut-off values of MR EROA, Echo-RegVol and CMR-RegVol associated with enlarged indLVEDV were lower in women (40 mm2, 60 mL, 50 mL) than in men (45 mm2,77 mL, 62 mL). LVESD ≥ 40 mm showed in women and men high specificity [Sp] (91%, 79%) but poor sensitivity [Se] (40% 50%) to predict enlarged indLVESV, while the optimal threshold was slightly lower in women (35 mm, Se = 65%, Sp = 71%) than in men (37 mm, Se = 65%, Sp = 68%).

Conclusion

Despite clear hallmarks of more advanced valve disease, women with primary MR have lower mitral RegVol and lower ventricular volumes than men. Then, cut-off values of mitral RegVol, EROA and LV dimensions for predicting abnormal LV dilatation are lower in women than in men. Hence, guideline-based criteria for grading MR and timing of intervention could be sex-specific (Fig. 1).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
性别对二尖瓣脱垂致原发性二尖瓣返流严重程度评估和心脏重构的影响
目前推荐的初级二尖瓣反流(MR)定量(有效反流口面积[EROA],反流容积[RegVol])和MR左心室重构(收缩末期直径[ESD])的临界值没有性别特异性。方法回顾性评估2005年至2022年间在3个三级中心接受超声心动图(Echo)和心脏磁共振成像(CMR)检查的470例因脱垂而患有慢性显著原发性MR的患者(27%为女性,中位年龄63岁)。结果女性比男性年龄大,NYHA分级高,左房容积大,肺动脉压高,症状引发的MV干预较多(P <0.035)。然而,女性的MR EROA、Echo-RegVol和CMR-RegVol均低于男性(P <0.003),而CMR反流分数(RegFrac)值相似(P = 0.890)。CMR异常升高- (>在55%、29%的患者中分别观察到以UK Biobank参考值上限为指标的左室舒张末期容积(indLVEDV)、收缩末期容积(indLVESV),无性别差异(P = 1, P = 0.9)。与indLVEDV增大相关的MR EROA、Echo-RegVol和CMR-RegVol的最佳临界值在女性中(40 mm2、60 mL、50 mL)低于男性(45 mm2、77 mL、62 mL)。LVESD≥40 mm在女性和男性中预测indLVESV增大的特异性[Sp]高(91%,79%),敏感性[Se]低(40%,50%),而女性的最佳阈值(35 mm, Se = 65%, Sp = 71%)略低于男性(37 mm, Se = 65%, Sp = 68%)。结论:尽管有更晚期瓣膜疾病的明确标志,但原发性MR女性的二尖瓣RegVol和心室容积低于男性。然后,二尖瓣RegVol、EROA和左室尺寸预测异常左室扩张的临界值在女性中低于男性。因此,基于指南的MR分级标准和干预时间可能是性别特异性的(图1)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases Supplements
Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases Supplements CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
508
期刊介绍: Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases Supplements is the official journal of the French Society of Cardiology. The journal publishes original peer-reviewed clinical and research articles, epidemiological studies, new methodological clinical approaches, review articles, editorials, and Images in cardiovascular medicine. The topics covered include coronary artery and valve diseases, interventional and pediatric cardiology, cardiovascular surgery, cardiomyopathy and heart failure, arrhythmias and stimulation, cardiovascular imaging, vascular medicine and hypertension, epidemiology and risk factors, and large multicenter studies. Additionally, Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases also publishes abstracts of papers presented at the annual sessions of the Journées Européennes de la Société Française de Cardiologie and the guidelines edited by the French Society of Cardiology.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Contents How to Report postoperative pediatric cardiac surgery? Review and analysis of the literature Surgical or transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement, how to choose ? No coronary artery in the aorta: Severe congenital malformation under-diagnosed
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1