A. Altes , F. Levy , V. Hanet , D. De Azevedo , P. Krug , L. Iacuzio , M. Toledano , V. Silvestri , D. Vancraeynest , A. Pasquet , A. Vincentelli , A. Eker , S. Marechaux , B. Gerber
{"title":"Impact of sex on severity assessment and cardiac remodeling in primary mitral regurgitation due to valve prolapse","authors":"A. Altes , F. Levy , V. Hanet , D. De Azevedo , P. Krug , L. Iacuzio , M. Toledano , V. Silvestri , D. Vancraeynest , A. Pasquet , A. Vincentelli , A. Eker , S. Marechaux , B. Gerber","doi":"10.1016/j.acvdsp.2023.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The current recommended cut-off values for primary mitral regurgitation (MR) quantification (Effective Regurgitant Orifice Area [EROA], regurgitant volume [RegVol]) and left ventricular (LV) remodeling in MR (end-systolic diameter [ESD]) are not sex-specific.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>We retrospectively evaluated 470 patients (27% women, median age 63 years) with chronic significant primary MR due to prolapse who underwent echocardiography<span> (Echo) and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in 3 tertiary centers between 2005 and 2022.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>Women were older than men, had higher NYHA class, larger left atrial volume, higher pulmonary pressure, and more symptoms-triggered MV intervention (all </span><em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.035). However, both MR EROA, Echo-RegVol and CMR-RegVol were lower in women than in men (all <em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <span>0.003), while CMR regurgitant fraction (RegFrac) values were similar (</span><em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.890). Abnormally increased CMR- (> upper limit bound of UK Biobank reference values) indexed LV end-diastolic (indLVEDV), end-systolic volume (indLVESV) were observed in 55%, 29% of patients, respectively, without sex difference (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.9). The optimal cut-off values of MR EROA, Echo-RegVol and CMR-RegVol associated with enlarged indLVEDV were lower in women (40 mm<sup>2</sup>, 60<!--> <!-->mL, 50<!--> <!-->mL) than in men (45 mm<sup>2</sup>,77<!--> <!-->mL, 62<!--> <!-->mL). LVESD ≥ 40<!--> <!-->mm showed in women and men high specificity [Sp] (91%, 79%) but poor sensitivity [Se] (40% 50%) to predict enlarged indLVESV, while the optimal threshold was slightly lower in women (35<!--> <!-->mm, Se<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->65%, Sp<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->71%) than in men (37<!--> <!-->mm, Se<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->65%, Sp<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->68%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Despite clear hallmarks of more advanced valve disease, women with primary MR have lower mitral RegVol and lower ventricular volumes than men. Then, cut-off values of mitral RegVol, EROA and LV dimensions for predicting abnormal LV dilatation are lower in women than in men. Hence, guideline-based criteria for grading MR and timing of intervention could be sex-specific (<span>Fig. 1</span>).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8140,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases Supplements","volume":"15 3","pages":"Page 243"},"PeriodicalIF":18.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases Supplements","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878648023001416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
The current recommended cut-off values for primary mitral regurgitation (MR) quantification (Effective Regurgitant Orifice Area [EROA], regurgitant volume [RegVol]) and left ventricular (LV) remodeling in MR (end-systolic diameter [ESD]) are not sex-specific.
Method
We retrospectively evaluated 470 patients (27% women, median age 63 years) with chronic significant primary MR due to prolapse who underwent echocardiography (Echo) and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in 3 tertiary centers between 2005 and 2022.
Results
Women were older than men, had higher NYHA class, larger left atrial volume, higher pulmonary pressure, and more symptoms-triggered MV intervention (all P < 0.035). However, both MR EROA, Echo-RegVol and CMR-RegVol were lower in women than in men (all P < 0.003), while CMR regurgitant fraction (RegFrac) values were similar (P = 0.890). Abnormally increased CMR- (> upper limit bound of UK Biobank reference values) indexed LV end-diastolic (indLVEDV), end-systolic volume (indLVESV) were observed in 55%, 29% of patients, respectively, without sex difference (P = 1, P = 0.9). The optimal cut-off values of MR EROA, Echo-RegVol and CMR-RegVol associated with enlarged indLVEDV were lower in women (40 mm2, 60 mL, 50 mL) than in men (45 mm2,77 mL, 62 mL). LVESD ≥ 40 mm showed in women and men high specificity [Sp] (91%, 79%) but poor sensitivity [Se] (40% 50%) to predict enlarged indLVESV, while the optimal threshold was slightly lower in women (35 mm, Se = 65%, Sp = 71%) than in men (37 mm, Se = 65%, Sp = 68%).
Conclusion
Despite clear hallmarks of more advanced valve disease, women with primary MR have lower mitral RegVol and lower ventricular volumes than men. Then, cut-off values of mitral RegVol, EROA and LV dimensions for predicting abnormal LV dilatation are lower in women than in men. Hence, guideline-based criteria for grading MR and timing of intervention could be sex-specific (Fig. 1).
期刊介绍:
Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases Supplements is the official journal of the French Society of Cardiology. The journal publishes original peer-reviewed clinical and research articles, epidemiological studies, new methodological clinical approaches, review articles, editorials, and Images in cardiovascular medicine. The topics covered include coronary artery and valve diseases, interventional and pediatric cardiology, cardiovascular surgery, cardiomyopathy and heart failure, arrhythmias and stimulation, cardiovascular imaging, vascular medicine and hypertension, epidemiology and risk factors, and large multicenter studies. Additionally, Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases also publishes abstracts of papers presented at the annual sessions of the Journées Européennes de la Société Française de Cardiologie and the guidelines edited by the French Society of Cardiology.