Examining the Indonesian government’s social media use for disaster risk communication

IF 1.5 2区 文学 Q2 COMMUNICATION Asian Journal of Communication Pub Date : 2021-12-03 DOI:10.1080/01292986.2021.2007274
G. A. Yudarwati, I. A. Putranto, K. Delmo
{"title":"Examining the Indonesian government’s social media use for disaster risk communication","authors":"G. A. Yudarwati, I. A. Putranto, K. Delmo","doi":"10.1080/01292986.2021.2007274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Social media have become widely used platforms for risk communication. Nevertheless, as this paper identifies there are potential challenges associated with the use social media, i.e. trust and credibility, misinformation, and digital inequality. This study uses three case studies to analyze the Indonesian government’s messaging strategies on social media for disaster risk communication, while navigating these challenges. Thematic content analysis of Indonesian emergency units’ social media posts during disaster events and of in-depth interviews with the personnel of the government agencies reveal the problematic aspects of the unidirectional top-down pattern of social media disaster risk communication. The messages mainly convey information about situations related to the disasters and government activities in local communities during disasters. Government agencies did not see social media as an appropriate channel for local communities most likely to be impacted or that such communities are shaped by culturally embedded beliefs and who might have limited accesses to the technology. This study suggests that patterns of social media use for disaster risk communication can differ across cultures. The collectivist culture of Indonesian communities has led to the two-step flow of communication model that proposes embracing culture and social capital to build trust, credibility, and overcome digital inequalities.","PeriodicalId":46924,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Communication","volume":"32 1","pages":"1 - 20"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2021.2007274","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Social media have become widely used platforms for risk communication. Nevertheless, as this paper identifies there are potential challenges associated with the use social media, i.e. trust and credibility, misinformation, and digital inequality. This study uses three case studies to analyze the Indonesian government’s messaging strategies on social media for disaster risk communication, while navigating these challenges. Thematic content analysis of Indonesian emergency units’ social media posts during disaster events and of in-depth interviews with the personnel of the government agencies reveal the problematic aspects of the unidirectional top-down pattern of social media disaster risk communication. The messages mainly convey information about situations related to the disasters and government activities in local communities during disasters. Government agencies did not see social media as an appropriate channel for local communities most likely to be impacted or that such communities are shaped by culturally embedded beliefs and who might have limited accesses to the technology. This study suggests that patterns of social media use for disaster risk communication can differ across cultures. The collectivist culture of Indonesian communities has led to the two-step flow of communication model that proposes embracing culture and social capital to build trust, credibility, and overcome digital inequalities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
考察印尼政府使用社交媒体进行灾害风险沟通的情况
摘要社交媒体已成为广泛使用的风险沟通平台。然而,正如本文所指出的,社交媒体的使用存在潜在的挑战,即信任和可信度、错误信息和数字不平等。本研究使用三个案例研究来分析印尼政府在应对这些挑战的同时,在社交媒体上进行灾害风险沟通的信息策略。对印尼应急部队在灾难事件期间在社交媒体上发布的帖子以及对政府机构人员的深入采访进行的主题内容分析揭示了社交媒体灾难风险沟通单向自上而下模式的问题所在。这些信息主要传达与灾害有关的情况以及灾害期间当地社区的政府活动。政府机构不认为社交媒体是最有可能受到影响的当地社区的合适渠道,也不认为这些社区是由根深蒂固的文化信仰塑造的,他们可能对技术的访问有限。这项研究表明,不同文化之间使用社交媒体进行灾害风险沟通的模式可能不同。印尼社区的集体主义文化导致了传播模式的两步流动,该模式建议拥抱文化和社会资本,以建立信任、信誉并克服数字不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Launched in 1990, Asian Journal of Communication (AJC) is a refereed international publication that provides a venue for high-quality communication scholarship with an Asian focus and perspectives from the region. We aim to highlight research on the systems and processes of communication in the Asia-Pacific region and among Asian communities around the world to a wide international audience. It publishes articles that report empirical studies, develop communication theory, and enhance research methodology. AJC is accepted by and listed in the Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) published by Clarivate Analytics. The journal is housed editorially at the Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore, jointly with the Asian Media Information and Communication Centre (AMIC).
期刊最新文献
The impacts of new propaganda media use on youth's political socialization Islamic communication research: this is just the start Islamic communication in Asia has a distinctive colour, style, and practice The dynamics of social media influencer-driven CSR advertising: The role of sponsorship disclosure and perceived similarity Social media intergroup expression and White Americans’ attitudes toward ethnic Chinese during COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1