A design science research approach to closing the gap between the research and practice of project scheduling

IF 1.8 4区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI:10.1002/SRES.2743
J. Scales
{"title":"A design science research approach to closing the gap between the research and practice of project scheduling","authors":"J. Scales","doi":"10.1002/SRES.2743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper illustrates one researcher’s experience of applying Design Science Research (DSR) to the nexus between systems thinking and project scheduling. Project management has become increasingly popular in the decades since its advent but has changed little in that time. This is especially true is of its signature technique, project scheduling. Scheduling research however is vibrant and modern and even includes dynamic concepts such as learning curves in schedule construction. However, justifications for acquiring this level of systems literacy have not yet convinced the practice community. A similar gap is identified in management science and a literature review yields two potential solutions; dissolving the subjective-objective divide by adopting Critical Realism and using Design Science Research as a framework for producing artefacts. This paper outlines how these concepts were applied to project scheduling, resulting in a new method for schedule construction that allows an expanded range of concepts to be included.","PeriodicalId":47538,"journal":{"name":"SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/SRES.2743","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/SRES.2743","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This paper illustrates one researcher’s experience of applying Design Science Research (DSR) to the nexus between systems thinking and project scheduling. Project management has become increasingly popular in the decades since its advent but has changed little in that time. This is especially true is of its signature technique, project scheduling. Scheduling research however is vibrant and modern and even includes dynamic concepts such as learning curves in schedule construction. However, justifications for acquiring this level of systems literacy have not yet convinced the practice community. A similar gap is identified in management science and a literature review yields two potential solutions; dissolving the subjective-objective divide by adopting Critical Realism and using Design Science Research as a framework for producing artefacts. This paper outlines how these concepts were applied to project scheduling, resulting in a new method for schedule construction that allows an expanded range of concepts to be included.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种缩小项目进度研究与实践差距的设计科学研究方法
本文阐述了一位研究人员将设计科学研究(DSR)应用于系统思维与项目调度之间关系的经验。项目管理自出现以来的几十年里变得越来越流行,但在那个时候几乎没有改变。这一点在它的标志性技术——项目调度上尤为明显。然而,调度研究是充满活力的和现代的,甚至包括动态的概念,如学习曲线的进度建设。然而,获得这种水平的系统素养的理由还没有说服实践社区。在管理科学中也发现了类似的差距,文献综述提出了两种可能的解决方案;采用批判现实主义,将设计科学研究作为生产人工制品的框架,消解主观与客观的鸿沟。本文概述了如何将这些概念应用于项目日程安排,从而产生了一种新的时间表构建方法,该方法允许包括扩展范围的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
14.80%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: Systems Research and Behavioral Science publishes original articles on new theories, experimental research, and applications relating to all levels of living and non-living systems. Its scope is comprehensive, dealing with systems approaches to: the redesign of organisational and societal structures; the management of administrative and business processes; problems of change management; the implementation of procedures to increase the quality of work and life; the resolution of clashes of norms and values; social cognitive processes; modelling; the introduction of new scientific results, etc. The editors especially want manuscripts of a theoretical or empirical nature which have broad interdisciplinary implications not found in a journal devoted to a single discipline.
期刊最新文献
Rural electrification in India: A wicked problem Enhancing group recommender systems: A fusion of social tagging and collaborative filtering for cohesive recommendations Archetypal representations of dilemmas concerning invasive alien species management—A case of invasive Lantana camara in the protected areas of Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve, India Understanding vehicle demand dynamics in Indian road transport: A qualitative framework An application of systems thinking to group-based organisations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1