The Effect of Standing Versus Sitting on Creativity in Adolescents—A Crossover Randomized Trial: The PHIT2LEARN Study

IF 1.9 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Mind Brain and Education Pub Date : 2023-08-29 DOI:10.1111/mbe.12381
Petra J. Luteijn, I. V. D. van der Wurff, Piet van Tuijl, Amika S. Singh, H. Savelberg, R. D. de Groot
{"title":"The Effect of Standing Versus Sitting on Creativity in Adolescents—A Crossover Randomized Trial: The PHIT2LEARN Study","authors":"Petra J. Luteijn, I. V. D. van der Wurff, Piet van Tuijl, Amika S. Singh, H. Savelberg, R. D. de Groot","doi":"10.1111/mbe.12381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Creativity is important for school performance. As several brain mechanisms involved in creativity are stimulated by low‐intensity physical activity, standing might influence creativity. Few studies on the relationship between standing and creativity have been executed, and none among vocational education and training (VET) students. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate whether standing influences creativity in VET students. In a randomized crossover study, 192 VET students were randomly allocated to standing or sitting (i.e., control) for 30 min. After 15 min, they performed two creativity tests: Guilford's Alternative Uses Test (divergent thinking) and Remote Associates Test (convergent thinking). Subsequently, conditions were switched, and the procedure was repeated. Multilevel analyses showed no significant effect of standing on divergent or convergent thinking test performance. Our results show that 30 min of standing does not affect creativity in VET students.","PeriodicalId":51595,"journal":{"name":"Mind Brain and Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mind Brain and Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12381","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Creativity is important for school performance. As several brain mechanisms involved in creativity are stimulated by low‐intensity physical activity, standing might influence creativity. Few studies on the relationship between standing and creativity have been executed, and none among vocational education and training (VET) students. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate whether standing influences creativity in VET students. In a randomized crossover study, 192 VET students were randomly allocated to standing or sitting (i.e., control) for 30 min. After 15 min, they performed two creativity tests: Guilford's Alternative Uses Test (divergent thinking) and Remote Associates Test (convergent thinking). Subsequently, conditions were switched, and the procedure was repeated. Multilevel analyses showed no significant effect of standing on divergent or convergent thinking test performance. Our results show that 30 min of standing does not affect creativity in VET students.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
站着和坐着对青少年创造力的影响——一项交叉随机试验:PHIT2LEAR研究
创造力对学校表现很重要。由于参与创造力的几种大脑机制受到低强度体育活动的刺激,站立可能会影响创造力。很少有人对站立和创造力之间的关系进行研究,也没有在职业教育和培训(VET)学生中进行研究。因此,本研究的目的是调查站立是否影响VET学生的创造力。在一项随机交叉研究中,192名VET学生被随机分配为站着或坐着(即对照组),为期30天 15分钟后 min,他们进行了两项创造力测试:Guilford的另类用途测试(发散思维)和Remote Associates测试(收敛思维)。随后,切换条件,并重复该程序。多层次分析显示,站立对发散性或收敛性思维测试成绩没有显著影响。我们的结果显示 最小站立时间不影响VET学生的创造力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Mind, Brain, and Education (MBE), recognized as the 2007 Best New Journal in the Social Sciences & Humanities by the Association of American Publishers" Professional & Scholarly Publishing Division, provides a forum for the accessible presentation of basic and applied research on learning and development, including analyses from biology, cognitive science, and education. The journal grew out of the International Mind, Brain, and Education Society"s mission to create a new field of mind, brain and education, with educators and researchers expertly collaborating in integrating the variety of fields connecting mind, brain, and education in research, theory, and/or practice.
期刊最新文献
Need for Cognition, Neuromyths, and Knowledge about the Brain in Aspiring Teachers Sibling Effects on School Achievement: Evidence From Two Large French Cohorts Evidence, Policy, Education, and Neuroscience—The State of Play in the UK Underutilized Techniques and Underrepresented Samples in Educational Neuroscience Research: An Introduction to the Special Issue Fixation Disparity: A Possible Index of Visuospatial Cognition during Authentic Learning Tasks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1