Evaluating the Impact of Introducing Modified Early Warning Score to Identify Deteriorating Patients in the Wards at a Tertiary University Hospital - A before-after Study

Anusha Arbettu Kamath, Ashwin Neelavar Udupa, Anitha Nileshwar
{"title":"Evaluating the Impact of Introducing Modified Early Warning Score to Identify Deteriorating Patients in the Wards at a Tertiary University Hospital - A before-after Study","authors":"Anusha Arbettu Kamath, Ashwin Neelavar Udupa, Anitha Nileshwar","doi":"10.14260/jemds.v11i11.235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND \nModified early warning score (MEWS) is a scoring system being used in hospitals for the identification of patients who may deteriorate into medical emergencies or cardiac arrest. However, the mortality benefit of MEWS hasn’t been established. Also, there is limited data about the experience of MEWS being implemented in low-income countries. Hence, we conducted a before-after prospective observational study to evaluate the impact on ICU mortality post-introduction of the MEWS chart. \nMETHODS \nMEWS before-after study is a single-centre prospective observational study in a tertiary university hospital conducted in the ICU at Kasturba Hospital, Manipal University, India. We trained ward nurses on MEWS and introduced the MEWS chart and compared the change in outcomes from two months prior (i.e. February-March 2018) to the subsequent two months (i.e. April-May 2018). The primary outcome measured was the ICU mortality between the samples. Our secondary outcomes were the length of stay (LOS) and hospital mortality. Student t-test was used to estimate the total sample size and we used the chi-square test for statistical analyses. \nRESULTS \nWe enrolled 161 patients into each group and the patient demographics between groups did not show any statistically significant difference. The ICU mortality data did not show any statistically significant difference before the introduction of MEWS after using the chi-square test with a p-value of 0.33. There was no statistically significant difference in ICU LOS, ICU re-admission rates, hospital LOS, hospital mortality, bed occupancy rates, or incidence of CPR between the two periods. \nCONCLUSIONS \nOur study did not show a significant difference in the mortality after introduction of MEWS scoring charts to our wards. The introduction of critical care outreach services may improve the outcomes.","PeriodicalId":47072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences-JEMDS","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences-JEMDS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds.v11i11.235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Modified early warning score (MEWS) is a scoring system being used in hospitals for the identification of patients who may deteriorate into medical emergencies or cardiac arrest. However, the mortality benefit of MEWS hasn’t been established. Also, there is limited data about the experience of MEWS being implemented in low-income countries. Hence, we conducted a before-after prospective observational study to evaluate the impact on ICU mortality post-introduction of the MEWS chart. METHODS MEWS before-after study is a single-centre prospective observational study in a tertiary university hospital conducted in the ICU at Kasturba Hospital, Manipal University, India. We trained ward nurses on MEWS and introduced the MEWS chart and compared the change in outcomes from two months prior (i.e. February-March 2018) to the subsequent two months (i.e. April-May 2018). The primary outcome measured was the ICU mortality between the samples. Our secondary outcomes were the length of stay (LOS) and hospital mortality. Student t-test was used to estimate the total sample size and we used the chi-square test for statistical analyses. RESULTS We enrolled 161 patients into each group and the patient demographics between groups did not show any statistically significant difference. The ICU mortality data did not show any statistically significant difference before the introduction of MEWS after using the chi-square test with a p-value of 0.33. There was no statistically significant difference in ICU LOS, ICU re-admission rates, hospital LOS, hospital mortality, bed occupancy rates, or incidence of CPR between the two periods. CONCLUSIONS Our study did not show a significant difference in the mortality after introduction of MEWS scoring charts to our wards. The introduction of critical care outreach services may improve the outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估引入改进的早期预警评分来识别三级大学医院病房中病情恶化患者的影响——前后研究
修订早期预警评分(MEWS)是一种用于医院识别可能恶化为医疗紧急情况或心脏骤停的患者的评分系统。然而,MEWS的死亡率效益尚未得到证实。此外,关于低收入国家实施MEWS的经验的数据有限。因此,我们进行了一项前后前瞻性观察研究,以评估引入MEWS图表后对ICU死亡率的影响。方法MEWS前后对照研究是在印度马尼帕尔大学Kasturba医院ICU进行的一项单中心前瞻性观察性研究。我们对病房护士进行了MEWS培训,并引入了MEWS图表,并比较了两个月前(即2018年2月至3月)和随后两个月(即2018年4月至5月)的结果变化。测量的主要结局是样本间ICU死亡率。我们的次要结局是住院时间(LOS)和住院死亡率。用学生t检验估计总样本量,用卡方检验进行统计分析。结果每组入组161例,组间患者人口统计学差异无统计学意义。采用卡方检验,引入MEWS前ICU死亡率数据差异无统计学意义,p值为0.33。两组间ICU住院时间、ICU再入院率、医院住院时间、医院死亡率、床位占用率或心肺复苏术发生率均无统计学差异。结论:我们的研究没有显示在我们的病房引入MEWS评分表后死亡率有显著差异。引入重症监护外展服务可能会改善结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
180
期刊最新文献
Emphysematous Pyelonephritis with Extension of Air in the Inferior Vena Cava Cytomorphological Pattern of Neoplastic and Non-Neoplastic Breast Lesions - An Institutional Experience of a Rural Tertiary Care Center Nephrotic Syndrome in Pregnancy - Case Reports Case Report - Trauma Induced Vernet’s Syndrome Leptomeningeal Metastases in Carcinoma Rectum with Extensive Skeletal Metastasis - A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1