Modern Chinese Religion I: Song-Liao-Jin-Yuan (960–1368 AD) ed. by John Lagerwey and Pierre Marsone (review)

IF 0.3 3区 历史学 0 ASIAN STUDIES Journal of Song-Yuan Studies Pub Date : 2018-03-27 DOI:10.1353/SYS.2016.0013
B. Haar
{"title":"Modern Chinese Religion I: Song-Liao-Jin-Yuan (960–1368 AD) ed. by John Lagerwey and Pierre Marsone (review)","authors":"B. Haar","doi":"10.1353/SYS.2016.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The writing of a survey text of the arts produced during a single Chinese dynasty is no easy feat, especially when the body of material to be surveyed—as in the case of the Yuan dynasty—is shaped by artistic traditions drawn from throughout the known world during the century it examines. Measured against the scale of the endeavor, the concerns raised above are small; yet these concerns are representative of, rather than exceptional to, the attention paid to detail in the text, the strength of which is found in its Big Picture. Craig Clunas’s Empire of Great Brightness: Visual and Material Cultures of Ming China, 1368–1644, succeeded in surveying the arts of the Ming dynasty (1368–1644) in part because Clunas has written more on the arts of the Ming dynasty than any other living author, and in part because the nativist focus of the Ming dynasty limited the geographical scope of its cultural hinterland.28 In contrast, The Mongol Century is a book that might best have been written by a team of scholars, ideally specialists in the various languages, cultures, and art histories that shaped the Sino-Mongol state, as well as those, cited and uncited in The Mongol Century, whose work collectively has transformed the field in the past twenty years. But to give credit where credit is due, this review is not the first to voice that opinion.29","PeriodicalId":41503,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Song-Yuan Studies","volume":"46 1","pages":"259 - 281"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/SYS.2016.0013","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Song-Yuan Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/SYS.2016.0013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The writing of a survey text of the arts produced during a single Chinese dynasty is no easy feat, especially when the body of material to be surveyed—as in the case of the Yuan dynasty—is shaped by artistic traditions drawn from throughout the known world during the century it examines. Measured against the scale of the endeavor, the concerns raised above are small; yet these concerns are representative of, rather than exceptional to, the attention paid to detail in the text, the strength of which is found in its Big Picture. Craig Clunas’s Empire of Great Brightness: Visual and Material Cultures of Ming China, 1368–1644, succeeded in surveying the arts of the Ming dynasty (1368–1644) in part because Clunas has written more on the arts of the Ming dynasty than any other living author, and in part because the nativist focus of the Ming dynasty limited the geographical scope of its cultural hinterland.28 In contrast, The Mongol Century is a book that might best have been written by a team of scholars, ideally specialists in the various languages, cultures, and art histories that shaped the Sino-Mongol state, as well as those, cited and uncited in The Mongol Century, whose work collectively has transformed the field in the past twenty years. But to give credit where credit is due, this review is not the first to voice that opinion.29
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
近代中国宗教I:宋辽金元(公元960-1368年),约翰·拉格威、皮埃尔·马松编(书评)
撰写一篇关于中国一个王朝时期艺术的调查文本绝非易事,尤其是当要调查的材料主体——就像元朝的情况一样——是由其所调查的世纪中来自已知世界的艺术传统所塑造的。以努力的规模来衡量,上面提出的担忧很小;然而,这些担忧代表了文本对细节的关注,而不是例外,文本的力量体现在其大画面中。克雷格·克吕纳斯(Craig Clunas)的《大明帝国:中国明代的视觉和物质文化》(Empire of Great Brightness:Visual and Material Cultures of Ming China,1368-1644)成功地考察了明代的艺术,部分原因是克吕纳斯写的关于明代艺术的文章比任何其他在世的作家都多,这在一定程度上是因为明朝对本土主义的关注限制了其文化腹地的地理范围。28相比之下,《蒙古世纪》这本书最好是由一组学者撰写的,他们最好是研究塑造中国-蒙古国家的各种语言、文化和艺术史的专家,在过去的二十年里,他的工作共同改变了这个领域。但是,为了在应该得到赞扬的地方给予赞扬,这篇评论并不是第一篇发表这一观点的评论。29
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Remembering Thomas T. Allsen (1940–2019): Medieval Eurasia Reimagined Xia Changpu (Hsia Chang-pwu) 夏長樸 (1947–2021) Order, Culture, and Local Administration on the Northern Border: Han Qi in Dingzhou (1048–1053) Consecrating the Imperial City: Tibetan Stupas in Yuan Dadu Brian E. McKnight 馬伯良: June 10, 1938–August 19, 2021
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1