Cancer Patients’ Knowledge of Exercise in Cancer: A Cross-sectional Study

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Bezmialem Science Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.14235/bas.galenos.2021.6532
Ahsen Oğul, Sabriye Ercan
{"title":"Cancer Patients’ Knowledge of Exercise in Cancer: A Cross-sectional Study","authors":"Ahsen Oğul, Sabriye Ercan","doi":"10.14235/bas.galenos.2021.6532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ÖZ Objective: Exercise is effective in reducing the risk of cancer, and treatment side effects. However, our empirical observations indicate that patients diagnosed with cancer have poor knowledge of exercise in cancer. This study aimed to evaluate cancer patients’ knowledge of exercise in cancer. Methods: After a review of the literature, the researchers developed a questionnaire aimed at evaluating knowledge of exercise in cancer. The study included patients with a history of cancer aged ≥18 years. The participants were asked to respond to each item in the electronic survey by selecting “I had no idea”, “I have heard of it”, or “I know very well”. Results: The study included a total of 125 participants with a history of cancer (75 females, 60%; 50 males, 40%), and their mean age was 52.05±11.50 years. We determined the validity and reliability of the questionnaire before analyzing participants' knowledge of exercise in cancer. Bartlett's test of sphericity and the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure indicated that the data were appropriate for factor analysis (p<0.001). Factor analysis confirmed the structural validity of the questionnaire. Cronbach’s alpha was calculated as 0.963, implying reliable internal consistency. Subsequently, we analyzed participants’ answers to the questionnaire and observed that the response rate of “I know very well” ranged between 3.2% and 14.4% for different items. Conclusion: We prepared and validated a tool for the measurement of knowledge exercise i.e., patients diagnosed as having cancer. The sample size was calculated as five participants per item, that is 125 participants. The developed questionnaire can contribute to assess and improve knowledge of exercise among cancer patients.","PeriodicalId":8757,"journal":{"name":"Bezmialem Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bezmialem Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14235/bas.galenos.2021.6532","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ÖZ Objective: Exercise is effective in reducing the risk of cancer, and treatment side effects. However, our empirical observations indicate that patients diagnosed with cancer have poor knowledge of exercise in cancer. This study aimed to evaluate cancer patients’ knowledge of exercise in cancer. Methods: After a review of the literature, the researchers developed a questionnaire aimed at evaluating knowledge of exercise in cancer. The study included patients with a history of cancer aged ≥18 years. The participants were asked to respond to each item in the electronic survey by selecting “I had no idea”, “I have heard of it”, or “I know very well”. Results: The study included a total of 125 participants with a history of cancer (75 females, 60%; 50 males, 40%), and their mean age was 52.05±11.50 years. We determined the validity and reliability of the questionnaire before analyzing participants' knowledge of exercise in cancer. Bartlett's test of sphericity and the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure indicated that the data were appropriate for factor analysis (p<0.001). Factor analysis confirmed the structural validity of the questionnaire. Cronbach’s alpha was calculated as 0.963, implying reliable internal consistency. Subsequently, we analyzed participants’ answers to the questionnaire and observed that the response rate of “I know very well” ranged between 3.2% and 14.4% for different items. Conclusion: We prepared and validated a tool for the measurement of knowledge exercise i.e., patients diagnosed as having cancer. The sample size was calculated as five participants per item, that is 125 participants. The developed questionnaire can contribute to assess and improve knowledge of exercise among cancer patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癌症患者的运动知识:一项横断面研究
ÖZ目的:运动可以有效降低癌症的风险,并治疗副作用。然而,我们的经验观察表明,被诊断为癌症的患者对癌症运动的了解很差。本研究旨在评估癌症癌症患者的运动知识。方法:在查阅文献后,研究人员编制了一份旨在评估癌症运动知识的问卷。该研究包括有癌症病史的患者,年龄≥18岁。参与者被要求对电子调查中的每个项目做出回答,选择“我不知道”、“我听说过”或“我非常清楚”。结果:该研究共包括125名有癌症病史的参与者(75名女性,60%;50名男性,40%),平均年龄为52.05±11.50岁。在分析参与者对癌症运动知识之前,我们确定了问卷的有效性和可靠性。Bartlett球度检验和Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin测量表明,这些数据适用于因子分析(p<0.001)。因子分析证实了问卷的结构有效性。Cronbachα的计算值为0.963,这意味着可靠的内部一致性。随后,我们分析了参与者对问卷的回答,发现不同项目的“我非常了解”回答率在3.2%至14.4%之间。结论:我们准备并验证了一种测量知识锻炼的工具,即诊断为癌症的患者。样本量计算为每个项目5名参与者,即125名参与者。开发的问卷有助于评估和提高癌症患者的运动知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bezmialem Science
Bezmialem Science MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
102
期刊最新文献
The Influence of Varicocelectomy Age on Semen Parameters and Fertility Rates One-year Body Mass Index Change in Adult Renal Transplant Recipients and Its Relationship with Glomerular Filtration Rate and Creatinine Level: A Retrospective Study Defining Effective Performance Management Strategies for Hospital with a Novel Fuzzy Decision-Making Model Effect of Reaction Time Exercises on Physical Functionality, and Quality of Life in Geriatrics - a Non-controlled Study Attitude and Knowledge of Intensive Care Nurses About Organ Donation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1