Universal Reach at Birth: Family Connects.

4区 法学 Q1 Social Sciences Future of Children Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1353/foc.2019.0003
Kenneth A Dodge, W Benjamin Goodman
{"title":"Universal Reach at Birth: Family Connects.","authors":"Kenneth A Dodge, W Benjamin Goodman","doi":"10.1353/foc.2019.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>How do we screen all families in a population at a single time point, identify family-specific risks, and connect each family with evidence-based community resources that can help them overcome those risks-an approach known as <i>targeted universalism</i>? In this article, Kenneth A. Dodge and W. Benjamin Goodman describe Family Connects, a program designed to do exactly that. Developed and tested in Durham, NC, Family Connects-now in place at 16 sites in the United States-aims to reach every family giving birth in a given community. The program rests on three pillars. The first is <i>home visiting</i>: trained nurses (or other program representatives) welcome new babies into the community, typically at the birthing hospital, then work with the parents to set up one or more home visits when the baby is about three weeks old so they can identify needs and connect the family with community resources. The second pillar, <i>community alignment</i>, is an assembly of all community resources available to families at birth, including child care agencies, mental health providers, government social services, and long-term programs for subgroups of families with identified needs, such as Healthy Families and Early Head Start. The third pillar, <i>data and monitoring</i>, is an electronic data system that acts as a family-specific psychosocial and educational record (much like an electronic health record) to document nurses' assessments of mother and infant, as well as connections with community agencies. In randomized clinical trials, Family Connects has shown promising results. Compared to control group families, families randomly assigned to the program made more connections to community resources. They also reported more positive parenting behaviors and fewer serious injuries or illnesses among their infants, among other desirable outcomes. And in the first five years of life, Family Connects children were significantly less likely to be subject to Child Protective Services investigations than were children in a control group.</p>","PeriodicalId":51448,"journal":{"name":"Future of Children","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10994213/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future of Children","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.2019.0003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"法学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How do we screen all families in a population at a single time point, identify family-specific risks, and connect each family with evidence-based community resources that can help them overcome those risks-an approach known as targeted universalism? In this article, Kenneth A. Dodge and W. Benjamin Goodman describe Family Connects, a program designed to do exactly that. Developed and tested in Durham, NC, Family Connects-now in place at 16 sites in the United States-aims to reach every family giving birth in a given community. The program rests on three pillars. The first is home visiting: trained nurses (or other program representatives) welcome new babies into the community, typically at the birthing hospital, then work with the parents to set up one or more home visits when the baby is about three weeks old so they can identify needs and connect the family with community resources. The second pillar, community alignment, is an assembly of all community resources available to families at birth, including child care agencies, mental health providers, government social services, and long-term programs for subgroups of families with identified needs, such as Healthy Families and Early Head Start. The third pillar, data and monitoring, is an electronic data system that acts as a family-specific psychosocial and educational record (much like an electronic health record) to document nurses' assessments of mother and infant, as well as connections with community agencies. In randomized clinical trials, Family Connects has shown promising results. Compared to control group families, families randomly assigned to the program made more connections to community resources. They also reported more positive parenting behaviors and fewer serious injuries or illnesses among their infants, among other desirable outcomes. And in the first five years of life, Family Connects children were significantly less likely to be subject to Child Protective Services investigations than were children in a control group.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
出生时的普遍接触:家庭联系
总结:我们如何在一个时间点筛选人群中的所有家庭,识别特定家庭的风险,并将每个家庭与循证社区资源联系起来,帮助他们克服这些风险——这种方法被称为有针对性的普遍主义?在这篇文章中,Kenneth A.Dodge和W.Benjamin Goodman描述了Family Connects,一个旨在做到这一点的程序。Family Connects在北卡罗来纳州达勒姆市开发和测试,目前在美国16个地点实施,旨在覆盖特定社区中的每个分娩家庭。该计划有三个支柱。第一种是家访:受过培训的护士(或其他项目代表)欢迎新生儿进入社区,通常是在分娩医院,然后在婴儿大约三周大时与父母合作安排一次或多次家访,以便他们能够确定需求,并将家庭与社区资源联系起来。第二个支柱,社区协调,是家庭在出生时可获得的所有社区资源的集合,包括儿童保育机构、心理健康提供者、政府社会服务,以及针对有明确需求的家庭亚组的长期计划,如健康家庭和早期领先。第三个支柱,数据和监测,是一个电子数据系统,它充当特定家庭的心理社会和教育记录(很像电子健康记录),记录护士对母亲和婴儿的评估,以及与社区机构的联系。在随机临床试验中,Family Connects显示出了有希望的结果。与对照组家庭相比,随机分配到该项目的家庭与社区资源的联系更多。他们还报告了更积极的育儿行为,婴儿的严重伤害或疾病更少,以及其他令人满意的结果。在生命的前五年,Family Connects儿童接受儿童保护服务调查的可能性明显低于对照组儿童。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Future of Children
Future of Children Multiple-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Future of Children is a collaboration of the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs at Princeton University and the Brookings Institution. The mission of The Future of Children is to translate the best social science research about children and youth into information that is useful to policymakers, practitioners, grant-makers, advocates, the media, and students of public policy. The project publishes two journals and policy briefs each year, and provides various short summaries of our work. Topics range widely -- from income policy to family issues to education and health – with children’s policy as the unifying element. The senior editorial team is diverse, representing two institutions and multiple disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Introducing the Issue Introducing the Issue Scaling Early Childhood Evidence-Based Interventions through RPPs Building Capacity for Research and Practice: A Partnership Approach A Unique Opportunity for Education Policy Makers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1