ON THE COMPLEXITY IN CIVIL LAW STUDIES

S. Suslova
{"title":"ON THE COMPLEXITY IN CIVIL LAW STUDIES","authors":"S. Suslova","doi":"10.33397/2619-0559-2019-1-1-363-381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"existing approaches to the content of the concept in relation to analysis of category with other methodological approaches, to suggest an algorithm for the correct application of this category in scientific works on specialty 12.00.03. Methods: empirical methods for describing, interpreting; theoretical methods of formal and dialectical logic; specific scientific methods; legal-dogmatic method. Results: the main approaches to understanding the complexity of scientific research are revealed, the research was carried out with the help of the systematic approach and the methods of vari-365 ous branches of scientific knowledge (not only jurisprudence); the author used scientific theories developed in various fields of law; the research allows to study law at different levels; any scientific research is complex. Conclusions: recogniz-ing different approaches to the understanding the term “complexity”, the author considers that it is necessary to specify its importance in relation to scientific and qualification works (PhD and doctoral theses). The author offers the universal understanding of the term, according to which complex studies are those which are based on the use of a systematic approach that allows to formulate conclu-sions that have signs of novelty.","PeriodicalId":33643,"journal":{"name":"Metodologicheskie problemy tsivilisticheskikh issledovanii","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metodologicheskie problemy tsivilisticheskikh issledovanii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33397/2619-0559-2019-1-1-363-381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

existing approaches to the content of the concept in relation to analysis of category with other methodological approaches, to suggest an algorithm for the correct application of this category in scientific works on specialty 12.00.03. Methods: empirical methods for describing, interpreting; theoretical methods of formal and dialectical logic; specific scientific methods; legal-dogmatic method. Results: the main approaches to understanding the complexity of scientific research are revealed, the research was carried out with the help of the systematic approach and the methods of vari-365 ous branches of scientific knowledge (not only jurisprudence); the author used scientific theories developed in various fields of law; the research allows to study law at different levels; any scientific research is complex. Conclusions: recogniz-ing different approaches to the understanding the term “complexity”, the author considers that it is necessary to specify its importance in relation to scientific and qualification works (PhD and doctoral theses). The author offers the universal understanding of the term, according to which complex studies are those which are based on the use of a systematic approach that allows to formulate conclu-sions that have signs of novelty.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论民法研究的复杂性
现有的概念内容分析方法与其他方法论方法相结合,提出了在12.00.03专业科学著作中正确应用这一类别的算法。方法:实证方法描述、解释;形式逻辑与辩证逻辑的理论方法;具体的科学方法;法律教条主义的方法。结果:揭示了理解科学研究复杂性的主要途径,本研究是借助系统方法和科学知识的各个分支(不仅仅是法理学)的方法进行的;作者运用了法律各个领域发展起来的科学理论;该研究允许对法律进行不同层次的研究;任何科学研究都是复杂的。结论:认识到理解“复杂性”一词的不同方法,作者认为有必要明确其在科学和资格工作(博士和博士论文)中的重要性。作者提供了对这个术语的普遍理解,根据这个理解,复杂的研究是那些基于使用系统方法的研究,这些方法可以得出具有新颖迹象的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
LEGAL MODELING AS A METHOD OF CIVIL RESEARCH ON THE METHODOLOGICAL POTENTIAL OF THE THEORY OF SYSTEMIC ORGANIZATION OF INTERSECTORAL RELATIONS OF CIVIL LAW: TO THE ANNIVERSARY OF M.IU. CHELYSHEV PHILOSOPHICAL BATTLE AGAINST MORAL HAZARD: DO WE NEED LAW METHODOLOGY CHANGE FROM “ALL OR NOTHING PRINCIPLE” TO “PRINCIPLE OF PROPORTIONALITY”? THE CONCEPT OF GOOD GOVERNANCE IN THE EU LEGISLATION: ANALYSIS IN THE CONTEXT OF METHODOLOGY OF THE CIVIL LAW RESEARCH ADDITIONAL CONCLUSION ON A DISSERTATION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1