Comparing the Textbook with Professors’ Intended and Enacted Potential Intellectual Need for Infinite Series in Calculus II

Nikole Heon, M. Mills
{"title":"Comparing the Textbook with Professors’ Intended and Enacted Potential Intellectual Need for Infinite Series in Calculus II","authors":"Nikole Heon, M. Mills","doi":"10.1080/19477503.2023.2169490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Infinite series are known to be challenging for Calculus II students, perhaps because they lack intellectual need for the content. In their analysis of Calculus textbooks found few instances of potential intellectual needs for infinite series. This study combines a textbook analysis with interviews of four professors and observations of their video-taped lectures. We compared the intellectual need in the textbook with what the professors intended to present and what they presented in lecture. The professors collectively intended to present the same potential intellectual needs that are found in the textbook, and they enacted presentations of these needs in their lectures. However, the professors incorporated more application problems than were found in the sections of the book. We outline implications for instructors, textbook authors, and course coordinators. In particular, reordering the topics to better show the intellectual need for power series and including more activities to engage students in problematic situations that power series can resolve. We noted that the instructors were presenting intellectual needs for power series in their own ways and were not reliant on the textbook.","PeriodicalId":36817,"journal":{"name":"Investigations in Mathematics Learning","volume":"15 1","pages":"169 - 185"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigations in Mathematics Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2023.2169490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Infinite series are known to be challenging for Calculus II students, perhaps because they lack intellectual need for the content. In their analysis of Calculus textbooks found few instances of potential intellectual needs for infinite series. This study combines a textbook analysis with interviews of four professors and observations of their video-taped lectures. We compared the intellectual need in the textbook with what the professors intended to present and what they presented in lecture. The professors collectively intended to present the same potential intellectual needs that are found in the textbook, and they enacted presentations of these needs in their lectures. However, the professors incorporated more application problems than were found in the sections of the book. We outline implications for instructors, textbook authors, and course coordinators. In particular, reordering the topics to better show the intellectual need for power series and including more activities to engage students in problematic situations that power series can resolve. We noted that the instructors were presenting intellectual needs for power series in their own ways and were not reliant on the textbook.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《微积分II》教材与教授对无穷级数潜在智力需求的比较
众所周知,无穷级数对微积分II的学生来说很有挑战性,也许是因为他们对内容缺乏智力需求。在他们对微积分教材的分析中,很少发现对无穷级数有潜在智力需求的例子。这项研究将教科书分析与对四位教授的采访以及对他们讲座录像的观察相结合。我们将教材中的智力需求与教授们打算展示的内容和他们在课堂上展示的内容进行了比较。教授们共同打算提出与教科书中相同的潜在智力需求,并在讲座中对这些需求进行了阐述。然而,教授们提出的应用问题比书中的章节中发现的要多。我们概述了对讲师、教材作者和课程协调员的影响。特别是,对主题进行重新排序,以更好地展示对幂级数的智力需求,并包括更多的活动,让学生参与幂级数可以解决的问题情境。我们注意到,导师们以自己的方式提出了对幂级数的智力需求,而不是依赖于课本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Investigations in Mathematics Learning
Investigations in Mathematics Learning Mathematics-Mathematics (all)
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Connections within the Multiplicative Field: A Case Study of Adán’s Mathematical Thinking Investigating the Complexity in Elementary Teachers’ Noticing of Children’s Mathematical Thinking in Written Work Preservice Secondary Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching: Focus on Reflective Practice The Role of Units Coordination in Preservice Elementary Teachers' Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching Units Construction and Coordination: Past, Present, and Future
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1