The usage of social media encouraged patients' active participation in medical decision-making: cross-sectional survey (Preprint)

Q2 Medicine Journal of Participatory Medicine Pub Date : 2018-08-03 DOI:10.2196/11828
Yen-Yuan Chen, Yu-Fang Cheng, Chau-Chung Wu, T. Chu
{"title":"The usage of social media encouraged patients' active participation in medical decision-making: cross-sectional survey (Preprint)","authors":"Yen-Yuan Chen, Yu-Fang Cheng, Chau-Chung Wu, T. Chu","doi":"10.2196/11828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n BACKGROUND\n The rapid advance of information technology since the end of twentieth century has deeply influenced the ways people gather health information to use as references for medical decision-making. Studies have overwhelmingly been focused on the association between health information in the media and the usage of medical care, nevertheless, none of them have examined the association between the usage of social media for gathering health information and patients’ active participation in medical decision-making.\n \n \n OBJECTIVE\n The objective of this study was to examine the influence of the health information obtained from social media has on patients’ preference to actively participate in medical decision-making.\n \n \n METHODS\n The participants in this study were openly recruited from the patients who were admitted to the cardiology inpatient unit in the Department of Internal Medicine with an admission diagnosis of coronary artery disease. We used Control Preference Scale to estimate each patient’s preference to play an active role, a collaborative role, or a passive role in medical decision-making. We conducted multivariate logistic regression for examining the association between “gathering health information from social media” and “playing an active role in medical decision-making”, by including the confounding variables which have an association with the outcome variable with a p value of less than .30.\n \n \n RESULTS\n A total of 156 patients participated in this study. After adjusting for the confounding variables, patients who gathered health information related to coronary artery disease from social media were more likely to play an active role in medical decision-making (odds ratio = 2.85, p = 0.04). Furthermore, the odds of patients with one-year increment of their age for playing an active role in medical decision-making was decreased approximately by 6.20% (odds ratio = 0.94, p = 0.01), and patients cared for by Physician C preferred to play an active role as compared to other physicians (odds ratio = 5.37, p = 0.04).\n \n \n CONCLUSIONS\n Although health information gathered from social media may have been discussed and validated by one’s companions on social media, there is no guarantee that the health information is correct. If the health information gathered from social media is correct, patients’ active participation in medical decision-making is helpful in facilitating physician-patient communication towards that aim. Future studies may be focused on how information seekers use modern information technology to gather correct health information.\n \n \n CLINICALTRIAL\n N/A\n","PeriodicalId":36208,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Participatory Medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Participatory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/11828","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND The rapid advance of information technology since the end of twentieth century has deeply influenced the ways people gather health information to use as references for medical decision-making. Studies have overwhelmingly been focused on the association between health information in the media and the usage of medical care, nevertheless, none of them have examined the association between the usage of social media for gathering health information and patients’ active participation in medical decision-making. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to examine the influence of the health information obtained from social media has on patients’ preference to actively participate in medical decision-making. METHODS The participants in this study were openly recruited from the patients who were admitted to the cardiology inpatient unit in the Department of Internal Medicine with an admission diagnosis of coronary artery disease. We used Control Preference Scale to estimate each patient’s preference to play an active role, a collaborative role, or a passive role in medical decision-making. We conducted multivariate logistic regression for examining the association between “gathering health information from social media” and “playing an active role in medical decision-making”, by including the confounding variables which have an association with the outcome variable with a p value of less than .30. RESULTS A total of 156 patients participated in this study. After adjusting for the confounding variables, patients who gathered health information related to coronary artery disease from social media were more likely to play an active role in medical decision-making (odds ratio = 2.85, p = 0.04). Furthermore, the odds of patients with one-year increment of their age for playing an active role in medical decision-making was decreased approximately by 6.20% (odds ratio = 0.94, p = 0.01), and patients cared for by Physician C preferred to play an active role as compared to other physicians (odds ratio = 5.37, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS Although health information gathered from social media may have been discussed and validated by one’s companions on social media, there is no guarantee that the health information is correct. If the health information gathered from social media is correct, patients’ active participation in medical decision-making is helpful in facilitating physician-patient communication towards that aim. Future studies may be focused on how information seekers use modern information technology to gather correct health information. CLINICALTRIAL N/A
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社交媒体的使用鼓励患者积极参与医疗决策:横断面调查(预印本)
20世纪末以来,信息技术的飞速发展深刻影响了人们收集健康信息作为医疗决策参考的方式。绝大多数研究都集中在媒体中的健康信息与医疗保健使用之间的关系上,然而,没有一项研究研究了使用社交媒体收集健康信息与患者积极参与医疗决策之间的关系。目的本研究旨在探讨从社交媒体获取的健康信息对患者积极参与医疗决策的偏好的影响。方法:本研究的参与者从内科心内科住院诊断为冠状动脉疾病的患者中公开招募。我们使用控制偏好量表来估计每个患者在医疗决策中扮演主动角色,协作角色或被动角色的偏好。通过纳入p值小于0.30的与结果变量相关的混杂变量,我们进行了多变量逻辑回归,以检验“从社交媒体收集健康信息”与“在医疗决策中发挥积极作用”之间的关联。结果156例患者参与了本研究。在调整混杂变量后,从社交媒体收集冠状动脉疾病相关健康信息的患者更有可能在医疗决策中发挥积极作用(优势比= 2.85,p = 0.04)。此外,年龄增加1岁的患者在医疗决策中发挥积极作用的几率大约下降了6.20%(优势比= 0.94,p = 0.01),由C医师护理的患者比其他医师更倾向于发挥积极作用(优势比= 5.37,p = 0.04)。结论:虽然从社交媒体上收集的健康信息可能已经在社交媒体上被同伴讨论和验证,但不能保证健康信息的正确性。如果从社交媒体上收集的健康信息是正确的,那么患者积极参与医疗决策有助于促进医患之间的沟通。未来的研究可能集中在信息寻求者如何利用现代信息技术收集正确的健康信息。临床试验N /一个
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Participatory Medicine
Journal of Participatory Medicine Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Value Propositions for Digital Shared Medication Plans to Boost Patient-Health Care Professional Partnerships: Co-Design Study. Assessing Physician and Patient Agreement on Whether Patient Outcomes Captured in Clinical Progress Notes Reflect Treatment Success: Cross-Sectional Study. Using Community Engagement to Create a Telecoaching Intervention to Improve Self-Management in Adolescents and Young Adults With Cystic Fibrosis: Qualitative Study. Developing a Digital Tool to Calculate Protein Quality in Plant-Based Meals of Older Adults: User Engagement Design Approach With End Users. From English to "Englishes": A Process Perspective on Enhancing the Linguistic Responsiveness of Culturally Tailored Cancer Prevention Interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1