{"title":"FRANCESCA WOODMAN: WATER SPECIFIED","authors":"Harrison Adams","doi":"10.1080/17540763.2020.1779792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Paul de Man makes a distinction between interpretation and reading as that which finds meaning in a text versus an analysis of the relationship between a text’s rhetorical and grammatical dimensions, respectively. Interpretation, as he defines it, assumes that a text’s meaning is largely transparent and that there is no disharmony between how it means and what it means. Reading, on the other hand, makes no such assumptions: it shows how a text’s meaning cannot be reduced to grammar and seeks out moments of indeterminacy between its literal and figurative meanings. I propose a “reading” of Francesca Woodman’s photographs that demonstrates how the critical, largely feminist, literature on the artist engages in interpretation and thus fails to appreciate the artist’s exploration of photography’s conditions of representation. In the process, I argue that her photographs function like hypograms, a concept of de Man by way of Saussure, or infra-texts. In short, Woodman’s photographs are readings of photography and womanhood and her art defies conventional understandings of artistic identity and agency.","PeriodicalId":39970,"journal":{"name":"Photographies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17540763.2020.1779792","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photographies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17540763.2020.1779792","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Paul de Man makes a distinction between interpretation and reading as that which finds meaning in a text versus an analysis of the relationship between a text’s rhetorical and grammatical dimensions, respectively. Interpretation, as he defines it, assumes that a text’s meaning is largely transparent and that there is no disharmony between how it means and what it means. Reading, on the other hand, makes no such assumptions: it shows how a text’s meaning cannot be reduced to grammar and seeks out moments of indeterminacy between its literal and figurative meanings. I propose a “reading” of Francesca Woodman’s photographs that demonstrates how the critical, largely feminist, literature on the artist engages in interpretation and thus fails to appreciate the artist’s exploration of photography’s conditions of representation. In the process, I argue that her photographs function like hypograms, a concept of de Man by way of Saussure, or infra-texts. In short, Woodman’s photographs are readings of photography and womanhood and her art defies conventional understandings of artistic identity and agency.
Paul de Man将解读和阅读区分为在文本中找到意义的解读和对文本修辞和语法维度之间关系的分析。正如他所定义的那样,解释假设文本的含义在很大程度上是透明的,它的含义和含义之间没有不和谐。另一方面,阅读并没有做出这样的假设:它展示了文本的含义如何不能简化为语法,并寻找其字面意义和比喻意义之间的不确定性时刻。我建议对弗朗西斯卡·伍德曼的照片进行“解读”,以展示关于艺术家的批判性的、主要是女权主义的文学作品是如何进行解读的,从而未能欣赏艺术家对摄影表现条件的探索。在这个过程中,我认为她的照片的功能类似于深成图,一种通过索绪尔或基础文本的方式对德曼的概念。简言之,伍德曼的照片是对摄影和女性身份的解读,她的艺术挑战了对艺术身份和代理的传统理解。