Globalising genderphobia and the case of Bulgaria

IF 0.7 4区 文学 Q3 CULTURAL STUDIES European Journal of English Studies Pub Date : 2022-05-04 DOI:10.1080/13825577.2022.2091281
{"title":"Globalising genderphobia and the case of Bulgaria","authors":"E. Slavova","doi":"10.1080/13825577.2022.2091281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Globalisation has made it easier for progressive ideas to cross borders. Yet the same can be said about regressive ideologies. Under the guise of protecting local traditions, family rights and national identity, genderphobic discourses have spread in seemingly unrelated parts of the world. Bulgaria is a case in point: a powerful religious-nationalist-conservative front has formed against women’s, LGBT+ and ethnic minority rights. This article explores the roots of the anti-feminist movements in the USA, Russia, and Europe. It looks critically at a range of discourse strategies and manipulation techniques used by these movements. And it presents three examples from Bulgaria: the assault on the term “gender,” a seemingly benign pro-birth media campaign, and raising moral panic about the threat to the traditional family. Apparently, behind the anti-globalist, genderphobic campaigns, there are well coordinated global forces at work. Distorting and toxifying the meanings of words, appropriating human rights terms, strategic lying and manipulation have become the tools of a hybrid war meant to undermine democratic societies. The role of language in this process is crucial. So is the role of linguists, who need to approach these phenomena from a critical perspective.","PeriodicalId":43819,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of English Studies","volume":"26 1","pages":"176 - 196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of English Studies","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13825577.2022.2091281","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Globalisation has made it easier for progressive ideas to cross borders. Yet the same can be said about regressive ideologies. Under the guise of protecting local traditions, family rights and national identity, genderphobic discourses have spread in seemingly unrelated parts of the world. Bulgaria is a case in point: a powerful religious-nationalist-conservative front has formed against women’s, LGBT+ and ethnic minority rights. This article explores the roots of the anti-feminist movements in the USA, Russia, and Europe. It looks critically at a range of discourse strategies and manipulation techniques used by these movements. And it presents three examples from Bulgaria: the assault on the term “gender,” a seemingly benign pro-birth media campaign, and raising moral panic about the threat to the traditional family. Apparently, behind the anti-globalist, genderphobic campaigns, there are well coordinated global forces at work. Distorting and toxifying the meanings of words, appropriating human rights terms, strategic lying and manipulation have become the tools of a hybrid war meant to undermine democratic societies. The role of language in this process is crucial. So is the role of linguists, who need to approach these phenomena from a critical perspective.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球化的性别恐惧症与保加利亚的案例
摘要全球化使进步思想更容易跨越国界。然而,倒退的意识形态也是如此。在保护当地传统、家庭权利和民族认同的幌子下,仇视性别的话语在世界上看似无关的地方传播开来。保加利亚就是一个很好的例子:一个强大的宗教民族主义保守阵线已经形成,反对妇女、LGBT+和少数民族的权利。本文探讨了美国、俄罗斯和欧洲反女权运动的根源。它批判性地审视了这些运动所使用的一系列话语策略和操纵技巧。它列举了保加利亚的三个例子:对“性别”一词的攻击,一场看似温和的支持生育的媒体运动,以及引发对传统家庭威胁的道德恐慌。显然,在反全球化、仇视性别的运动背后,有协调良好的全球力量在起作用。歪曲和毒害词语的含义、挪用人权术语、战略性谎言和操纵已成为旨在破坏民主社会的混合战争的工具。语言在这一过程中的作用至关重要。语言学家的作用也是如此,他们需要从批判性的角度来处理这些现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
Globalising telecommunications: the case of British Telecommunications PLC
IF 0.9 Journal of International Trade Law and PolicyPub Date : 2003-01-06 DOI: 10.1108/14770020380000344
D. Lal, P. Strachan, M. Raj
Globalising the firm through cooperative projects: the case of Renault
IF 0 International Journal of Automotive Technology and ManagementPub Date : 2002-01-01 DOI: 10.1504/IJATM.2002.000055
C. Midler, Patricio Neffa, J. Monnet
Tourism and terrorism: The case of Bulgaria
IF 0 Trakia Journal of SciencesPub Date : 2015-01-01 DOI: 10.15547/TJS.2015.S.01.018
H. Dobreva
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Reading transformations: from David Garnett’s Lady into Fox (1922) to Sarah Hall’s “Mrs Fox” (2013) The mind is all the animals it has attended: limitrophy and porous borders in the poetry of Robert Bringhurst Root identity–relation identity in Inga Simpson’s Understory: a life with trees Deconstructing human-canine relations in Richard Adams’s The Plague Dogs Hospitality and liminality in the time of the Anthropocene: Jenn Ashworth’s Fell
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1