Modern tax Havens: the Experience of European Countries

IF 1.2 Q3 ECONOMICS Montenegrin Journal of Economics Pub Date : 2022-09-15 DOI:10.14254/1800-5845/2022.18-4.6
Y. Kosenkova
{"title":"Modern tax Havens: the Experience of European Countries","authors":"Y. Kosenkova","doi":"10.14254/1800-5845/2022.18-4.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to assess the European tax havens in terms of corporate financial misconduct risks. The study relies on an index method developed by a group of economists belonging to the international non-governmental organization - the Tax Justice Network. The method allowed the authors to calculate the Corporate Tax Harbor Index (CTHI) and determine the role of a particular jurisdiction in global corporate financial misconduct risks. The study established a ranking of European tax havens and jurisdictions with features of tax havens and classified these tax havens based on corporate financial misconduct risks. The study found that European tax havens and tax haven jurisdictions accounted for nearly 40% of global corporate financial misuse risks in 2020. The classification of European tax havens according to corporate financial misconduct risks demonstrated that the Netherlands, Switzerland, the UK, Ireland, and Luxembourg accounted for more than half of the risks. The shares of Liechtenstein (1%), Monaco (1%), Andorra, and San Marino (less than 1%) did not exceed 3% of the European share of the global risk. The results show the need for adjustments to the regulatory policy of international organizations currently focused on fighting classic tax havens. Their real share of global misuse risks is very small compared to the share of 'gray cardinals' of the offshore market.","PeriodicalId":45544,"journal":{"name":"Montenegrin Journal of Economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Montenegrin Journal of Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14254/1800-5845/2022.18-4.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper aims to assess the European tax havens in terms of corporate financial misconduct risks. The study relies on an index method developed by a group of economists belonging to the international non-governmental organization - the Tax Justice Network. The method allowed the authors to calculate the Corporate Tax Harbor Index (CTHI) and determine the role of a particular jurisdiction in global corporate financial misconduct risks. The study established a ranking of European tax havens and jurisdictions with features of tax havens and classified these tax havens based on corporate financial misconduct risks. The study found that European tax havens and tax haven jurisdictions accounted for nearly 40% of global corporate financial misuse risks in 2020. The classification of European tax havens according to corporate financial misconduct risks demonstrated that the Netherlands, Switzerland, the UK, Ireland, and Luxembourg accounted for more than half of the risks. The shares of Liechtenstein (1%), Monaco (1%), Andorra, and San Marino (less than 1%) did not exceed 3% of the European share of the global risk. The results show the need for adjustments to the regulatory policy of international organizations currently focused on fighting classic tax havens. Their real share of global misuse risks is very small compared to the share of 'gray cardinals' of the offshore market.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现代避税天堂:欧洲国家的经验
本文旨在从企业财务不当行为风险的角度对欧洲避税天堂进行评估。这项研究采用了一种指数方法,该方法是由国际非政府组织税务正义网络(Tax Justice Network)的一组经济学家开发的。该方法允许作者计算企业税收港指数(CTHI),并确定特定司法管辖区在全球企业财务不当行为风险中的作用。该研究对具有避税天堂特征的欧洲避税天堂和司法管辖区进行了排名,并根据企业金融不当行为风险对这些避税天堂进行了分类。该研究发现,到2020年,欧洲避税天堂和避税天堂管辖区占全球企业财务滥用风险的近40%。根据企业金融不当行为风险对欧洲避税天堂进行的分类表明,荷兰、瑞士、英国、爱尔兰和卢森堡占了一半以上的风险。列支敦士登(1%)、摩纳哥(1%)、安道尔和圣马力诺(不到1%)的份额不超过欧洲在全球风险中所占份额的3%。研究结果表明,需要调整目前专注于打击经典避税天堂的国际组织的监管政策。与离岸市场的“灰色枢机”相比,它们在全球滥用风险中所占的实际份额非常小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: “Montenegrin Journal of Economics” is an international scientific periodical, issued by NGO “Economic Laboratory for Transition Research” (ELIT) Podgorica, Montenegro. It publishes theoretical, empirical and applicative articles from all the areas of Economics. The journal is issued four times a year. Montenegrin Journal of Economics aspires to educate the widest public on contemporary research and achievements in various areas of economics and to expend the boundaries of economic knowledge. Montenegrin Journal of Economics aims to publish innovative, straightforward, challenging, analytical and review articles on economic phenomena, events and changes . The journal''s content aspires to be actual, relevant and interesting to a wide readership of economic specialties,. This includes publishing the articles of authors from various universities and schools of economics worldwide and their mutual cooperation. Areas of research include, but are not limited to, the following: Economic Theory, International Economics, and Transition Issues.
期刊最新文献
Sustainability of Corporate Social Responsibility Integration into Business Activities: Changes During the COVID-19 Pandemic Assessment of the EU Labour Market During the COVID-19 Pandemic Experience of Kazakhstan in Implementation of International Standards in Auditing: Healthcare Sector McKinnon’s Complementarity Hypothesis for Tunisia: Autoregressive Distributed Lags (ARDL) Approach Determinants Affecting Tax Compliance Behavior of Small and Medium Enterprises in the Development Context of E-Commerce, Vietnam
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1