Coronary plaque characteristics associated with major adverse cardiovascular events in atherosclerotic patients and lesions – a systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 35.6 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS European Heart Journal Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehac544.1291
G. Gallone, M. Bellettini, F. Bruno, L. Scudeler, O. De Filippo, M. Iannaccone, L. Baldetti, B. Kwon-Koo, G. Pontone, A. Depaoli, P. Libby, G. Stone, J. Narula, G. D. De Ferrari, F. D’Ascenzo
{"title":"Coronary plaque characteristics associated with major adverse cardiovascular events in atherosclerotic patients and lesions – a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"G. Gallone, M. Bellettini, F. Bruno, L. Scudeler, O. De Filippo, M. Iannaccone, L. Baldetti, B. Kwon-Koo, G. Pontone, A. Depaoli, P. Libby, G. Stone, J. Narula, G. D. De Ferrari, F. D’Ascenzo","doi":"10.1093/eurheartj/ehac544.1291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n The clinical value of high-risk coronary plaque characteristics (CPCs) to inform intensified medical therapy or revascularization of non-flow-limiting lesion remains uncertain.\n \n \n \n We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to study the prognostic impact of CPCs on patient-level and lesion-level major cardiovascular adverse events (MACE).\n \n \n \n We systematically reviewed MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane database for studies evaluating the association of CPC with patient-level and lesion-level MACE. CPCs included high plaque burden, low minimal lumen area, thin cap fibroatheroma, high lipid core burden index, low attenuation plaque, spotty calcification, napkin ring sign, or positive remodelling.\n \n \n \n Thirty studies (21 retrospective, 9 prospective) with 30,369 patients were included. CPCs were evaluated by invasive intravascular techniques in 9 studies (optical coherence tomography=4, intravascular ultrasound imaging=3, near-infrared spectroscopy intravascular ultrasound imaging=2) and by coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in 21 studies. CPCs significantly predicted patient-level and lesion-level MACE in both unadjusted and adjusted analyses. For each CPC, the risks were higher for lesion-level (HR range 3.2–16.8) as compared with patient-level MACE (HR range 1.8–4.1). Accuracy was modest to good for most CPCs at the patient-level (AUC for MACE ranging between 0.53 and 0.84) and moderate to good for most CPCs at the lesion-level (AUC for MACE ranging between 0.71 and 0.83). Plaques with more than one CPC had the highest accuracy for lesion-level MACE (AUC 0.87, 95% CI 0.84–0.90). The pooled sensitivities of CPCs for lesion-level MACE ranged between 40% and 63% and specificities between 73% and 98%. As the pooled prevalence of CPCs among plaques was low (3% to 28%), the estimated positive predictive values for lesion-level MACE were modest (range 1% to 26%).\n \n \n \n CCTA and intravascular imaging characterization of CPCs identifies high-risk atherosclerotic plaques that place lesions and patients at risk for future MACE, albeit with modest sensitivity and positive predictive value (PROSPERO identifier: CRD42021251810).\n \n \n \n Type of funding sources: None.\n","PeriodicalId":11976,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":35.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehac544.1291","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The clinical value of high-risk coronary plaque characteristics (CPCs) to inform intensified medical therapy or revascularization of non-flow-limiting lesion remains uncertain. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to study the prognostic impact of CPCs on patient-level and lesion-level major cardiovascular adverse events (MACE). We systematically reviewed MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane database for studies evaluating the association of CPC with patient-level and lesion-level MACE. CPCs included high plaque burden, low minimal lumen area, thin cap fibroatheroma, high lipid core burden index, low attenuation plaque, spotty calcification, napkin ring sign, or positive remodelling. Thirty studies (21 retrospective, 9 prospective) with 30,369 patients were included. CPCs were evaluated by invasive intravascular techniques in 9 studies (optical coherence tomography=4, intravascular ultrasound imaging=3, near-infrared spectroscopy intravascular ultrasound imaging=2) and by coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in 21 studies. CPCs significantly predicted patient-level and lesion-level MACE in both unadjusted and adjusted analyses. For each CPC, the risks were higher for lesion-level (HR range 3.2–16.8) as compared with patient-level MACE (HR range 1.8–4.1). Accuracy was modest to good for most CPCs at the patient-level (AUC for MACE ranging between 0.53 and 0.84) and moderate to good for most CPCs at the lesion-level (AUC for MACE ranging between 0.71 and 0.83). Plaques with more than one CPC had the highest accuracy for lesion-level MACE (AUC 0.87, 95% CI 0.84–0.90). The pooled sensitivities of CPCs for lesion-level MACE ranged between 40% and 63% and specificities between 73% and 98%. As the pooled prevalence of CPCs among plaques was low (3% to 28%), the estimated positive predictive values for lesion-level MACE were modest (range 1% to 26%). CCTA and intravascular imaging characterization of CPCs identifies high-risk atherosclerotic plaques that place lesions and patients at risk for future MACE, albeit with modest sensitivity and positive predictive value (PROSPERO identifier: CRD42021251810). Type of funding sources: None.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
动脉粥样硬化患者和病变中与主要不良心血管事件相关的冠状动脉斑块特征——一项系统综述和荟萃分析
高危冠状动脉斑块特征(CPC)对非限流病变的强化药物治疗或血运重建的临床价值仍不确定。我们进行了一项系统综述和荟萃分析,以研究CPCs对患者水平和病变水平主要心血管不良事件(MACE)的预后影响。我们系统地回顾了MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane数据库中评估CPC与患者水平和病变水平MACE相关性的研究。CPCs包括高斑块负荷、低最小管腔面积、薄帽纤维斑块、高脂质核心负荷指数、低衰减斑块、斑点钙化、餐巾环征或阳性重塑。纳入了30项研究(21项回顾性研究,9项前瞻性研究),涉及30369名患者。在9项研究中,通过血管内侵入性技术(光学相干断层扫描=4,血管内超声成像=3,近红外光谱血管内超声图像=2)和21项研究中的冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影术(CCTA)评估了CPC。在未调整和调整的分析中,CPCs显著预测了患者水平和病变水平的MACE。对于每个CPC,与患者水平的MACE(HR范围1.8-4.1)相比,病变水平的风险更高(HR范围3.2-16.8)。在患者水平上,大多数CPC的准确度从中等到良好(MACE的AUC范围在0.53-0.84之间),在病变水平上,大部分CPC的准确率从中等到良(MACE AUC范围为0.71-0.83)病变水平的MACE(AUC 0.87,95%CI 0.84–0.90)。CPC对病变水平MACE的合并敏感性在40%至63%之间,特异性在73%至98%之间。由于斑块中CPC的合并患病率较低(3%至28%),病变水平MACE的阳性预测值估计值适中(范围为1%至26%)。CPCs的CCTA和血管内成像特征确定了将病变和患者置于未来MACE风险中的高风险动脉粥样硬化斑块,尽管具有适度的敏感性和阳性预测价值(PROSPERO标识符:CRD42021251810)。资金来源类型:无。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Heart Journal
European Heart Journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
39.30
自引率
6.90%
发文量
3942
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The European Heart Journal is a renowned international journal that focuses on cardiovascular medicine. It is published weekly and is the official journal of the European Society of Cardiology. This peer-reviewed journal is committed to publishing high-quality clinical and scientific material pertaining to all aspects of cardiovascular medicine. It covers a diverse range of topics including research findings, technical evaluations, and reviews. Moreover, the journal serves as a platform for the exchange of information and discussions on various aspects of cardiovascular medicine, including educational matters. In addition to original papers on cardiovascular medicine and surgery, the European Heart Journal also presents reviews, clinical perspectives, ESC Guidelines, and editorial articles that highlight recent advancements in cardiology. Additionally, the journal actively encourages readers to share their thoughts and opinions through correspondence.
期刊最新文献
Another brick in the wall of severe hypertriglyceridaemia lowering. Outcomes of heart failure with reduced, mildly reduced, or preserved ejection fraction: the ESC HF III registry. From biobank to prediction: polygenic risk scores for peripheral artery disease. Updated critical quality criteria for real-world artificial intelligence implementation. Targeting oral health to heal the arteries: periodontal therapy in modulation of atherosclerosis progression.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1