Do generations differ when it comes to green values and products?

Q3 Social Sciences Electronic Green Journal Pub Date : 2019-02-16 DOI:10.5070/g314239436
Scot Squires
{"title":"Do generations differ when it comes to green values and products?","authors":"Scot Squires","doi":"10.5070/g314239436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Author(s): Squires, Scot | Abstract: Purpose: This study investigates the environmental beliefs of three generations to discover whether their stated beliefs match their actions in regards to green purchases.Design/methodology/approach: 1,215 participants across three generations (Millennials, Generation Xers, and Baby Boomers) answered survey questions regarding their environmental beliefs and were assigned a \"Green\" score. They also answered questions regarding the types and quantities of past green purchases. Analyses were performed to determine if there were statically significant differences among the generations.Findings: Baby Boomers were the most environmentally friendly generation. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the types of items purchased by the three generations, and Baby Boomers only slightly outpaced the other two generations in the quantity of green items purchased.Research limitations/implications:Marketers can use this research to market environmentally friendly products differently to the three generations.Originality/value:This research expands on existing work in the areas of generational cohorts and green products.Keywords: generational cohorts, green products, GREEN Consumer Values Scale Paper type: Research paper","PeriodicalId":38802,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Green Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5070/g314239436","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Green Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5070/g314239436","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Author(s): Squires, Scot | Abstract: Purpose: This study investigates the environmental beliefs of three generations to discover whether their stated beliefs match their actions in regards to green purchases.Design/methodology/approach: 1,215 participants across three generations (Millennials, Generation Xers, and Baby Boomers) answered survey questions regarding their environmental beliefs and were assigned a "Green" score. They also answered questions regarding the types and quantities of past green purchases. Analyses were performed to determine if there were statically significant differences among the generations.Findings: Baby Boomers were the most environmentally friendly generation. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the types of items purchased by the three generations, and Baby Boomers only slightly outpaced the other two generations in the quantity of green items purchased.Research limitations/implications:Marketers can use this research to market environmentally friendly products differently to the three generations.Originality/value:This research expands on existing work in the areas of generational cohorts and green products.Keywords: generational cohorts, green products, GREEN Consumer Values Scale Paper type: Research paper
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在绿色价值观和产品方面,几代人是否有所不同?
作者:斯奎尔斯,苏格兰人|摘要:目的:本研究调查了三代人的环境信念,以发现他们所陈述的信念是否与他们在绿色购买方面的行为相匹配。设计/方法/方法:三代人(千禧一代、X一代和婴儿潮一代)的1215名参与者回答了有关他们环境信仰的调查问题,并获得了“绿色”分数。他们还回答了有关过去绿色采购的类型和数量的问题。进行分析以确定各代之间是否存在静态显著差异。研究结果:婴儿潮一代是最环保的一代。然而,三代人购买的物品类型没有统计学上的显著差异,婴儿潮一代在购买绿色物品的数量上仅略高于其他两代人。研究局限性/影响:营销人员可以利用这项研究来营销与三代人不同的环保产品。原创性/价值:这项研究扩展了世代群体和绿色产品领域的现有工作。关键词:世代群体,绿色产品,绿色消费者价值观量表纸张类型:研究论文
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Electronic Green Journal
Electronic Green Journal Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Review: Live Sustainably Now: A Low-Carbon Vision of the Good Life Designing a Green Library in Alignment with the UN's Sustainable Development Goal: a Case Study of Rajagiri Business School Library, Kerala, India Review: Climate Change isn't Everything: Liberating Climate Politics from Alarmism Review: Nature and Bureaucracy: The Wildness of Managed Landscapes Review: Profit: An Environmental History
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1