Key factors for designing and delivering an effective asynchronous professional learning experience

Ana Cabral, Stephen R. Fuller
{"title":"Key factors for designing and delivering an effective asynchronous professional learning experience","authors":"Ana Cabral, Stephen R. Fuller","doi":"10.21100/compass.v16i1.1392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we explore the key factors for designing and delivering an effective asynchronous professional learning experience. This research study was developed with 107 participants in a module of a Postgraduate Certificate in Academic Practice (PGCAP) - a qualification which is offered to new academics at a United Kingdom (UK) Russell Group university, in line with practice at many other UK higher education institutions (HEIs). The module design was led by a range of factors which the relevant literature deems important for ensuring successful asynchronous online learning design. A questionnaire was created to measure participants’ overall perceptions regarding efficiency (learning context, facilitation, tutor feedback, peer feedback) and gains (presence, participation, persistence, connectedness, sense of community, learning experience). Participants were also invited to refer to the extent to which peer collaboration contributed to learning, to how far they felt part of a community on the module and to whether the asynchronous learning approach facilitated learning. Our results both confirmed and contradicted the positive findings of the literature: respectively, our participants did indeed find that many of the asynchronous design factors led, for them, to successful learning; they also identified some of the factors (e.g., peer feedback) as more challenging. We discuss the results of our study in terms of the effectiveness of this range of factors, considering the specific context of our module; we raise relevant questions about the issues and dilemmas involved in designing and delivering asynchronous learning courses when participants have a dual role as both learners and teachers.","PeriodicalId":31649,"journal":{"name":"Compass Journal of Learning and Teaching","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Compass Journal of Learning and Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21100/compass.v16i1.1392","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, we explore the key factors for designing and delivering an effective asynchronous professional learning experience. This research study was developed with 107 participants in a module of a Postgraduate Certificate in Academic Practice (PGCAP) - a qualification which is offered to new academics at a United Kingdom (UK) Russell Group university, in line with practice at many other UK higher education institutions (HEIs). The module design was led by a range of factors which the relevant literature deems important for ensuring successful asynchronous online learning design. A questionnaire was created to measure participants’ overall perceptions regarding efficiency (learning context, facilitation, tutor feedback, peer feedback) and gains (presence, participation, persistence, connectedness, sense of community, learning experience). Participants were also invited to refer to the extent to which peer collaboration contributed to learning, to how far they felt part of a community on the module and to whether the asynchronous learning approach facilitated learning. Our results both confirmed and contradicted the positive findings of the literature: respectively, our participants did indeed find that many of the asynchronous design factors led, for them, to successful learning; they also identified some of the factors (e.g., peer feedback) as more challenging. We discuss the results of our study in terms of the effectiveness of this range of factors, considering the specific context of our module; we raise relevant questions about the issues and dilemmas involved in designing and delivering asynchronous learning courses when participants have a dual role as both learners and teachers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
设计和提供有效的异步专业学习体验的关键因素
在本文中,我们探讨了设计和提供有效的异步专业学习体验的关键因素。这项研究是由107名参与者共同开发的,他们参加了学术实践研究生证书(PGCAP)的一个模块。PGCAP是英国罗素集团大学为新学者提供的资格证书,与许多其他英国高等教育机构的做法一致。模块设计由一系列因素主导,相关文献认为这些因素对于确保异步在线学习设计的成功至关重要。制作了一份问卷,以衡量参与者对效率(学习环境、便利、导师反馈、同伴反馈)和收获(在场、参与、坚持、联系、社区感、学习体验)的总体看法。与会者还被邀请提及同伴协作对学习的贡献程度,他们在多大程度上感觉自己是模块中社区的一部分,以及异步学习方法是否有助于学习。我们的结果既证实了文献中的积极发现,也与之相矛盾:分别,我们的参与者确实发现,对他们来说,许多异步设计因素导致了成功的学习;他们还发现了一些更具挑战性的因素(例如同伴反馈)。考虑到我们模块的具体背景,我们从这一系列因素的有效性角度讨论了我们的研究结果;当参与者同时扮演学习者和教师的双重角色时,我们提出了关于异步学习课程设计和交付所涉及的问题和困境的相关问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Regulating the Privately Rented Sector: what can universities offer to support local authority workforce development? Open Scholarship and Decolonisation in Higher Education Exploring humour within the PhD experience: a first-hand reflection The Midterm Wrapper: Quasi-Experimental Evidence of an Effective Performance Intervention (Re)defining learning design: a framework fit for the twenty-first century
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1